« June 2008 | Main | August 2008 »

July 31, 2008

U.S. Wary of Pakistani Appeal for More Cooperation

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902482.html
U.S. Wary of Pakistani Appeal for More Cooperation
By Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A12 [Pakistan] [AfPak] [south asia] [Pakistan as the new Afghanistan] [hydra central] [AfPak] [Pakistan seemingly on the brink] [new coalition govt is fragile and is considering negotiating with Tribals-Islamists] [precarious as jihadis thrive among those with whom new govt is negotiating] [coalition govt threatening Musharraf presidency with reinstatement of judges] [the coalition takes its first military action against jihadis and others near Peshawar] [use hydra II] [followup] [as noted in recent comments in these pages, the intelligence “chatter” appears way up] [shades of 2001?] [archive in govt too] [*****]
Bush administration officials have responded with skepticism to an appeal by visiting Pakistani Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani for increased intelligence cooperation, which he said would help his country attack militant groups and terrorist encampments [******] near its border with Afghanistan.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902482.html
U.S. Wary of Pakistani Appeal for More Cooperation
By Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A12 [Pakistan] [AfPak] [south asia] [Pakistan as the new Afghanistan] [hydra central] [AfPak] [Pakistan seemingly on the brink] [new coalition govt is fragile and is considering negotiating with Tribals-Islamists] [precarious as jihadis thrive among those with whom new govt is negotiating] [coalition govt threatening Musharraf presidency with reinstatement of judges] [the coalition takes its first military action against jihadis and others near Peshawar] [use hydra II] [followup] [as noted in recent comments in these pages, the intelligence “chatter” appears way up] [shades of 2001?] [archive in govt too] [*****]
Bush administration officials have responded with skepticism to an appeal by visiting Pakistani Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani for increased intelligence cooperation, which he said would help his country attack militant groups and terrorist encampments [******] near its border with Afghanistan.
"The problem from our perspective has not been an absence of information going into the Pakistani government," said one Bush administration official familiar with discussions this week between the two governments. "It's an absence of action."
Both governments stressed that their meetings have been cordial, and public statements underlined a shared commitment to counterterrorism. President Bush, in an appearance with Gillani after a White House meeting Monday, twice noted U.S. respect for Pakistani sovereignty. In an interview yesterday, Gillani emphasized Pakistan's desire "to maintain excellent relations with the United States."
But beneath the surface pleasantries and what the administration official called "a desire to make this a nonconfrontational meeting," there was little indication that tensions over their respective contributions to the fight against al-Qaeda and the Taliban had eased.
The differences were illustrated Monday when a U.S. missile, believed to have been fired by a CIA-operated Predator drone, killed seven people in Pakistan hours before Bush and Gillani met. [***] U.S. officials said they thought the target, al-Qaeda operative Abu Khabab al-Masri, was killed, although U.S. and Pakistani officials said yesterday they were still seeking confirmation.
A Pakistani military spokesman, Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, said yesterday that U.S. officials had not notified Islamabad before the attack. "There was no information from their side," he said. "They have struck like this many times. We are trying to convince them to share information."
Both the U.S. military and the CIA operate unmanned Predator aircraft in the region. But the military, whose Predators are based at the Bagram base north of Kabul, maintains some level of coordination with Pakistani military liaisons at the base.
Although the CIA maintains close ties with its Pakistani counterpart, the Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence, the relationship has long been tinged with U.S. suspicion of ISI links with extremists. CIA distrust of the ISI has increased in recent months, particularly within the CIA operations directorate, a U.S. official said.
Gillani said such attacks violate Pakistani sovereignty, and noted that "we don't have the sophisticated weapons -- Predators or others." If Pakistan had the capacity and the information, he said in an interview with Washington Post editors and reporters yesterday, "then we can hit [such targets] ourselves. Otherwise, it's a violation and nobody [in Pakistan] will like it."
Specific requests, Gillani said, include devices to intercept and block radio transmissions between extremists in Afghanistan and Pakistan. With them, he said, 80 percent of cross-border infiltrations would be stopped. "It won't cost much, but we don't have the gadgets," [*****] he said.
Pakistan has been under U.S. pressure to step up efforts against extremists in its North-West Frontier and tribal areas along the borders. The four-month-old coalition government argues that it has made costly contributions to the counterterrorism fight, from the loss of nearly 1,000 soldiers killed since 2001 to the terrorist assassination last year of political leader Benazir Bhutto. Thirty Pakistani soldiers reportedly were taken hostage yesterday in fighting that ensued after insurgents overran a checkpoint in the Swat Valley near the Afghan border. [****]
His strategy for the border regions, Gillani said, includes talks with "nonmilitants . . . who throw down their arms and come into the mainstream," and addressing the "root cause" of extremism with economic aid. "But force is there," he said. "When all these things don't work, we have to have action."
Gillani met yesterday with Sen. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee. [****] Obama has said that, as president, he would authorize U.S. action inside Pakistan if there were firm intelligence on al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Gillani declined to discuss their conversation.
A Pakistani official said that a telephone conversation with Republican candidate John McCain was on Gillani's schedule. He will also meet today with congressional leaders and with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Correspondent Candace Rondeaux in Islamabad contributed to this report.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Nightlong Battle in Kashmir

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/asia/30brief-NIGHTLONGBAT_BRF.html
July 30, 2008
World Briefing | Asia
Nightlong Battle in Kashmir
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS [India] [India-Pakistan] [Kashmir] [communal violence within and between that has led to the precipice of regional war multiple times] [followup ] [in 2002, nearly a war on sub continent when jihadis stormed New Delhi parliament and killed lawmakers] [well before and since, Hindu-Muslim progroms as the spark to regional war] [this appears to be jihadis revenge] [India is on edge with the recent spate of terrorist bombings] [use psci469b] [use hydra II] [*******]
Indian and Pakistani soldiers fired at one another across the Kashmir frontier for more than 12 hours Monday night into Tuesday, in what the Indian Army called the most serious violation of a 2003 cease-fire agreement. [***]The nightlong battle came after one Indian soldier and four Pakistanis were killed Monday along the border between sections of Kashmir that are controlled by India and by Pakistan. The exchange of gunfire ended by noon, said Lt. Col. Anil Kumar Mathur, a spokesman for the Indian Army. No additional casualties were reported on Tuesday.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/asia/30brief-NIGHTLONGBAT_BRF.html
July 30, 2008
World Briefing | Asia
Nightlong Battle in Kashmir
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS [India] [India-Pakistan] [Kashmir] [communal violence within and between that has led to the precipice of regional war multiple times] [followup ] [in 2002, nearly a war on sub continent when jihadis stormed New Delhi parliament and killed lawmakers] [well before and since, Hindu-Muslim progroms as the spark to regional war] [this appears to be jihadis revenge] [India is on edge with the recent spate of terrorist bombings] [use psci469b] [use hydra II] [*******]
Indian and Pakistani soldiers fired at one another across the Kashmir frontier for more than 12 hours Monday night into Tuesday, in what the Indian Army called the most serious violation of a 2003 cease-fire agreement. [***]The nightlong battle came after one Indian soldier and four Pakistanis were killed Monday along the border between sections of Kashmir that are controlled by India and by Pakistan. The exchange of gunfire ended by noon, said Lt. Col. Anil Kumar Mathur, a spokesman for the Indian Army. No additional casualties were reported on Tuesday.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Report Credits Drop in Illegal Immigrants to Enforcement

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073001936.html
Report Credits Drop in Illegal Immigrants to Enforcement
Study Was Based on Census Data That Indicate Number of Less-Educated Hispanics Has Declined
By N.C. Aizenman
Washington Post Staff Writer [bush white house] [mostly bureaucracy] [DHS, ICE, and the national guard (hence dod?)] [immigration reform and 2007’s-2008’s emotions over same] [recent reports that some immigrants have been treated harshly and bizaarely] [question: did this simply result from “bad apples” in system who abused rules or did emotions trickle down (or horizontally for that matter) eventually causing cavilier behavior] [searching certain peoples’ laptops by ICE] [invasion of privacy?] [unlawful search?] [******]
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A16
A report released yesterday by a Washington think tank that advocates stricter limits on immigration says the number of illegal immigrants in the country appears to have declined significantly over the past year, at least partly because of the chilling effect of stepped-up enforcement. [****] [unsurprising?]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073001936.html
Report Credits Drop in Illegal Immigrants to Enforcement
Study Was Based on Census Data That Indicate Number of Less-Educated Hispanics Has Declined
By N.C. Aizenman
Washington Post Staff Writer [bush white house] [mostly bureaucracy] [DHS, ICE, and the national guard (hence dod?)] [immigration reform and 2007’s-2008’s emotions over same] [recent reports that some immigrants have been treated harshly and bizaarely] [question: did this simply result from “bad apples” in system who abused rules or did emotions trickle down (or horizontally for that matter) eventually causing cavilier behavior] [searching certain peoples’ laptops by ICE] [invasion of privacy?] [unlawful search?] [******]
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A16
A report released yesterday by a Washington think tank that advocates stricter limits on immigration says the number of illegal immigrants in the country appears to have declined significantly over the past year, at least partly because of the chilling effect of stepped-up enforcement. [****] [unsurprising?]
The study by the Center for Immigration Studies based its findings on census data that indicate that the number of less-educated, working-age Hispanic immigrants, defined as 18-to-40-year-olds with a high school diploma or less, has dropped by more than 10 percent, or about 830,000 people, since last August.
Previous research suggests that a large share of less-educated foreigners is in the country illegally and that it makes up the bulk of the illegal immigrant population. Furthermore, although earlier declines in the number of these Hispanic immigrants have been linked to a rise in their unemployment rate, the current drop-off began last year almost immediately after Congress abandoned legislation to legalize undocumented immigrants and six months before any significant rise in their unemployment rate had occurred.
During the same period, the number of foreigners who were more educated or non-Hispanic, and therefore far less likely to be illegal immigrants, continued to rise or hold steady.
"The evidence is consistent with the idea that at least initially, more robust enforcement caused the number of illegal immigrants to decline significantly," said Steven A. Camarota, one of the study's authors. "Some people seem to think illegals are so permanently anchored in the United States that there is no possibility of them leaving. . . . This suggests they're not correct. Some significant share might respond to changing incentives and leave."
Several demographers who specialize in estimating the illegal immigrant population expressed concern about the limits of the study's methodology but said they found the possibility that the illegal immigrant population is decreasing plausible. Determining the actual amount of that decline, however, is far more controversial. [*****]
The census does not ask about immigration status. Instead, government and independent researchers use a variety of techniques to estimate the number of immigrants in the country illegally. One way is to subtract the number of visas, permanent residency permits and naturalizations granted each year from the total number of foreigners counted by the census. The difference between the number of foreigners who can be accounted for through such records and the total number tallied by the census is considered to be the size of the illegal immigrant population.
Camarota and co-author Karen Jensenius took a different approach, calculating the previous ratio between the number of less-educated Hispanic immigrants counted by the census and the total illegal immigrant population estimated by government researchers, and then applying that ratio to the new, lower number of less-educated, working-age Hispanic immigrants to come up with a new estimate for the total illegal immigrant population. According to their calculations, from August of last year to May, the illegal immigrant population declined by about 11 percent, to about 11.17 million from a high of 12.49 million.
One drawback of Camarota's and Jensenius's method, noted the Pew Hispanic Center's Jeffrey S. Passel, a widely regarded expert on estimating the illegal immigrant population, is that "it tracks something that correlates with the number of illegal immigrants rather than the actual number of illegal immigrants, and it assumes the correlation remains the same."
"If the ratio [between the number of less-educated Hispanic adults and the total number of illegal immigrants] has changed, then the trend could be very different," Passel said.
Even more contentious is the question of what, if anything, the study's findings indicate about the impact that recent national and local immigration policies might have had on the size of the illegal immigrant population. Since December, the unemployment rate of less-educated, working-age Hispanics has risen to 7.06 percent from 4.93 percent, making it that much more difficult to determine whether the continued decline in their population during this period was the result of anything beyond basic economics.
But Camarota and Jensenius suggest that the six-month decline that occurred after the failure of the legalization legislation and before the rise of these workers' unemployment rate is one of several examples of a link between immigration policy and immigrant choices. They note, for instance, that starting in May of last year, when Congress's consideration of the legalization plan began receiving widespread media attention, the number of less-educated, working-age Hispanics began to rise.
"I call it the amnesty hump," Camarota said. He noted that the population increase during this period might not have been statistically significant, but "it seems that what was happening was that fewer illegal immigrants left than might otherwise have done so because they were hoping to qualify for legalization."
Also up for interpretation is the degree to which the drop in the number of less-educated Hispanic adults (and, by inference, illegal immigrants) was the result of fewer foreigners entering the country or more of them leaving. [***] The U.S. Border Patrol reported a 20 percent decline in apprehensions along the southern border over fiscal 2007, a possible indication that fewer illegal immigrants attempted to enter the country.
Camarota and Jensenius note that census data do not answer the question. But the authors suggest that if less-educated Hispanic adults were not leaving in greater numbers than before, their total population would merely grow more slowly, not decline steeply.
Among those who are leaving, the vast majority are probably doing so on their own. Despite a surge in work site raids and other enforcement measures, as well as decisions by various state and local governments to train their police to identify illegal immigrants, only 285,000 immigrants were removed from the United States last year, and many of those were formerly legal immigrants who lost their status after committing a crime.
Camarota and Jensenius said they take this as possible evidence that tougher enforcement can have a multiplier effect, scaring many more illegal immigrants into leaving of their own accord than authorities can pick up. And the authors suggest that if the trends they identify are sustained, "it would cut the illegal population in half within just five years."
However, Randolph Capps, a researcher with the Urban Institute who has studied the number of U.S. children born to illegal immigrants, cautioned against such reasoning.
Even if all the findings in the study by Camarota and Jensenius prove correct, he said, it is probable that the first million illegal immigrants to leave were those who had arrived more recently and had the weakest ties to the United States.
The remainder, including the more than half of illegal immigrant adults who have children in the United States, Capps said, are less likely to leave unless they are removed by the government.
"Having a kid in school provides a really strong incentive to stay," he said. In addition, "People who are more settled in the United States have more options. They can move to another [state or county] where enforcement is not as strict. If they lose a job, they can find another. If one member of the family is arrested and deported, they can find other relatives to stay with." [*********]
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

For White House, Hiring Is Political

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/washington/31capital.html
July 31, 2008
For White House, Hiring Is Political
By CHARLIE SAVAGE [bush white house] [president bush] [NSC principals as well as most other cabinet secretaries] [bureaucracy] [I have not followed this in these pages as it’s politicization of doj and White House not perforce foreign policy] [however, this is warranted here just to remember what was done in doj] [if done in doj, the most hallowed of bipartisan institutions in past administrations, it was done elsewhere] [followup] [*******]
WASHINGTON — On May 17, 2005, the White House’s political affairs office sent an e-mail message to agencies throughout the executive branch directing them to find jobs for 108 people on a list of “priority candidates” who had “loyally served the president.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/washington/31capital.html
July 31, 2008
For White House, Hiring Is Political
By CHARLIE SAVAGE [bush white house] [president bush] [NSC principals as well as most other cabinet secretaries] [bureaucracy] [I have not followed this in these pages as it’s politicization of doj and White House not perforce foreign policy] [however, this is warranted here just to remember what was done in doj] [if done in doj, the most hallowed of bipartisan institutions in past administrations, it was done elsewhere] [followup] [*******]
WASHINGTON — On May 17, 2005, the White House’s political affairs office sent an e-mail message to agencies throughout the executive branch directing them to find jobs for 108 people on a list of “priority candidates” who had “loyally served the president.”
“We simply want to place as many of our Bush loyalists as possible,” the White House emphasized in a follow-up message, according to a little-noticed passage of a Justice Department report released Monday about politicization in the department’s hiring of civil-service prosecutors and immigration officials. [********]
The report, the subject of a Senate oversight hearing Wednesday, provided a window into how the administration sought to install politically like-minded officials in positions of government responsibility, and how the efforts at times crossed customary or legal limits.
Andrew Rudalevige, an associate professor of political science at Dickinson College in Pennsylvania who studies presidential power, said that while presidents of both parties over the last half-century had sought ways to impose greater political control over the federal bureaucracy, the Bush administration had gone further than any predecessor. [their view of the unitary theory of executive’s war powers] [******]
“The Bush administration is unprecedented in how systematic the politicization is and how it extends both across the wider organization chart and deep down within the bureaucracy,” Professor Rudalevige said. “They’ve been very consistent from Day 1 in learning the lessons of previous administrations and pushing those tactics to the limit.”
Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman, said there was nothing inappropriate or unusual about installing White House allies in politically appointed positions, and insisted that it had never been the administration’s policy to consider political affiliation when hiring career civil servants.
“I reject the presumption that we have been any more or less aggressive than any other administration in trying to execute our policies,” Mr. Fratto said.
The report released on Monday by Justice Department investigators said that the context of the May 17, 2005, message from the White House “made plain” that it was seeking politically appointed government jobs, for which it is legal to take politics into account. The report did not say who sent the message.
But the message also urged administration officials to “get creative” in finding the patronage positions — and some political appointees carried out their mission with particular zeal.
“We pledge 7 slots within 40 days and 40 nights. Let the games begin!” Jan Williams, then the White House’s liaison to the Justice Department, said in an e-mail message two days later.
Within a week, messages between Ms. Williams and the White House showed, she began trying to match the White House-vetted names of people who had been “helpful to the president” — like campaign volunteers — with openings for immigration judges, positions that are supposed to be filled using politically neutral, merit-based criteria.
Ms. Williams told the Justice Department inspector general that she had not realized that immigration judges were career jobs subject to Civil Service rules. Mr. Fratto said there was no evidence that White House officials realized that at the time, either.
The department’s response to the May 2005 e-mail message was not the only instance in which government agencies appeared to have taken a White House political directive in a more aggressive direction.
In 2005, the White House, in seminars to agency liaisons, recommended that they use Internet searches when vetting certain applicants to determine their views on Mr. Bush, abortion and other matters, the Justice Department report said.
But at the Justice Department, Ms. Williams’s successor, Monica M. Goodling, began using an expanded version of the search to screen the views of candidates for career positions on matters as far-ranging as homosexuality, gun rights and the Iran-contra scandal. The report also accuses Ms. Goodling of asking candidates for Civil Service jobs to fill out a form disclosing their political activities.
Ms. Goodling admitted in Congressional testimony last year that she had “crossed the line” in applying a political litmus test to career job candidates. Through her lawyer this week, she declined to be interviewed.
Paul C. Light, a professor of government at New York University, said the administration had fostered an atmosphere that encouraged blurring the line between politics and policy, as when Mr. Bush gave Karl Rove, his top political adviser, a policy-making role in the White House. That atmosphere, Professor Light said, increased the chances of scandal by over-eager political appointees who ended up embarrassing the president.
“Once you send this permissive agenda to agencies, you can’t control it,” Professor Light said. “You want them to toe the line, but they may innovate.”
For example, he noted, when Mr. Bush first took office, his top political aides, including Mr. Rove, began briefing political appointees in agencies throughout the executive branch about coming elections and how policy decisions might affect the outcome of crucial races, according to several news reports.
In January 2007, a deputy to Mr. Rove conducted such a briefing for top managers of the General Services Administration, which handles more than $50 billion in annual contracts. At the end of the briefing, according to a Congressional investigation, the chief of the agency, Lurita A. Doan, encouraged agency officials to think about helping “our candidates” in the next election.
The accusations against Ms. Doan, who later resigned under pressure, dovetailed with ones leveled by David Kuo, the former deputy director of Mr. Bush’s Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives.
In a 2006 book, Mr. Kuo wrote that the office used taxpayer money to host events in 20 areas where motivating religious voters could swing the outcome of important Congressional races.
And the inspector general for the Department of Housing and Urban Development found that its secretary, Alphonso R. Jackson, had urged his staff to favor companies that were friendly to Mr. Bush when awarding contracts. Mr. Jackson resigned in the spring.
But nowhere have the charges of politicization been as intense as at the Justice Department, where the investigations into personnel practices began with the firing of nine United States attorneys in 2006.
The overlapping investigations have already led to the resignation of several top department officials, including Ms. Goodling and former Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales. And Democrats show no sign of easing up.
At Wednesday’s hearing, Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont and chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said the Justice Department reports had made clear that “the problems of injecting politics” into decisions that are supposed to be nonpartisan “are rooted deeper than just the actions of a handful of individuals.”
On Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee voted on party lines, 20 to 14, to recommend that Mr. Rove be cited for contempt for ignoring a subpoena and not appearing at a hearing to discuss the accusations of political interference by the White House into hiring practices at the Justice Department.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Bush Cuts Iraq Tours, but No Deal Yet on Security

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/world/middleeast/01iraq.html
August 1, 2008
Bush Cuts Iraq Tours, but No Deal Yet on Security
By STEVEN LEE MYERS and ALISSA J. RUBIN [bush white house] [president bush] [-iraq war/gsave/] [bureaucracy] [IC, special ops in dod, others?] [assisting –iraq with oil contracts] [said contracts reportedly favored US companies] [backlash in US congress, public, and abroad] [including in Arab world] [followup] [progress?] [or election and/or legacy pressure?] [use psci 355, 455] [*******]
WASHINGTON — President Bush said Thursday that increasing stability in Iraq would very likely allow the withdrawal of more American forces there. He praised the growing capability of Iraq’s government and security forces and said that terrorists were on the brink of defeat. [***********]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/world/middleeast/01iraq.html
August 1, 2008
Bush Cuts Iraq Tours, but No Deal Yet on Security
By STEVEN LEE MYERS and ALISSA J. RUBIN [bush white house] [president bush] [-iraq war/gsave/] [bureaucracy] [IC, special ops in dod, others?] [assisting –iraq with oil contracts] [said contracts reportedly favored US companies] [backlash in US congress, public, and abroad] [including in Arab world] [followup] [progress?] [or election and/or legacy pressure?] [use psci 355, 455] [*******]
WASHINGTON — President Bush said Thursday that increasing stability in Iraq would very likely allow the withdrawal of more American forces there. He praised the growing capability of Iraq’s government and security forces and said that terrorists were on the brink of defeat. [***********]
The president’s remarks, made in an unusual early morning statement outside the Oval Office, were the clearest indication yet that he intended to begin reducing the number of American troops before leaving office in less than six months.
Mr. Bush said the United States was “also making progress” in negotiations on the long-term security agreement with the Iraqi government, which sets the terms for the presence of American troops in Iraq and is under intense scrutiny in both countries. [****]
But he made no mention of a final agreement, despite some indications that Iraq and the United States were close to a deal, and with an unofficial deadline for the agreement expiring on Thursday.
His remarks appeared intended to highlight the success his decision last year to deploy a “surge” of 30,000 Americans, which has been credited with helping contain spiraling ethnic and sectarian violence. [fair enough] [it was certainly a important part] [I was wrong about it] [I thought the US ought ot have declared victory after second set of elections] [the golden dome attack in Samara nearly ruined the US effort] [***]
He noted that violence was at the lowest level since the spring of 2004, and that levels had stabilized over the last three months, even as the last of those additional forces left Iraq.
There are now roughly 140,000 American troops there still as many as there were two years ago, when the conflict peaked -- but Mr. Bush said that turnaround in Iraq would allow “further reductions in our combat forces, as conditions permit.”
He also highlighted his decision, announced in April, to reduce tours in Iraq to 12 months, from 15 months now, for units now heading to Iraq. The increase to 15 months had strained forces and was widely unpopular in the military, especially the Army. [***]
“We owe our thanks to all those who wear the uniform and their families who support them in their vital work,” Mr. Bush said, speaking alone just after 8 a.m. on the Colonnade outside the Oval Office. “And the best way to honor them is to support their mission, and bring them home with victory.”
The issue of American forces has been a contentious issue in American politics, and the reductions Mr. Bush foreshadowed could be announced in the thick of the presidential campaign. Senator Barack Obama, the Democratic candidate, has called for a withdrawal of all combat forces within a timetable of 16 months, a position the Republican contender, Senator John McCain, has ridiculed as defeatist.
The American commander in Iraq, Gen. David H. Petraeus, is now reviewing the American operations there, and is supposed to make a recommendation by mid-September. [***] While Mr. Bush and others have urged caution, warning that civil war could flare again, it no longer seems in doubt that the number of combat forces will come down.
Administration and military officials have indicated that Mr. Bush could withdraw or at least announce the withdrawal of as many as three combat brigades as many as 10,000 troops — before he leaves office in January. [****]At the same time, however, officials said that General Petraeus is likely to recommend a more cautious and gradual reduction.
Mr. Bush, for his part, sought not to declare victory prematurely — something that has haunted him since he appeared before a “Mission Accomplished” banner in 2003.
“We remain a nation at war,” he said. “Al Qaeda is on the run in Iraq, but the terrorists remain dangerous, and they are determined to strike our country and our allies again.” [********]
The long-term security agreement under negotiation, which is under intense scrutiny in both countries, will set the terms for the presence of American troops in Iraq. Negotiations stalled a month ago largely over the Bush administration’s refusal to specify an intention to withdraw troops.
While the current version of the emerging agreement does not specify any exact date, officials said, President Bush’s recent acknowledgment that withdrawal was an “aspirational goal” has revived the talks and pushed them closer to completion.
The emerging agreement, officials said, gives Iraqis much of what they want — most notably the guarantee that there would no longer be foreign troops visible on their land — and leaves room for them to discreetly ask for an extended American presence should security deteriorate. [********]
“The intention is to maintain full sovereignty for Iraq with close observation of the security situation, which will determine exactly when Iraq will no longer need American forces,” said Jalaluddin al-Sagheer, a member of Parliament from the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq who is close to the negotiations.
Although security nationwide has improved far more rapidly than expected in the last several months, it could erode quickly, a point that was underscored earlier this week in Kirkuk when a suicide bomber killed 24 people and set off accusations from different ethnic groups that quickly spiraled into a riot. [there will invariably be more Kirkuks!] [the question will be how the Iraqis deal with them] [**]
“The negotiations had gotten to the point that a draft was being circulated,” said an American official in Washington who is familiar with the negotiations.
The Americans have been pushing hard for an agreement to be reached in the next two days, said Haider al-Abbadi, a Parliament member close to Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, but he said that the Iraqis were not ready and that he was not sure they would be able to come to an agreement by then.
The Bush administration’s unofficial deadline for the deal has long been July 31. Although the United Nations mandate allowing American troops to operate in Iraq will not expire until the end of the year, politicians in both countries have been concerned that with elections approaching in the United States and Iraq, it might not be possible to reach an agreement once the fall campaign is in full swing and it would be better to finish negotiations during the summer.
It was not clear whether the draft would even include a tentative timetable for troop withdrawal. The American official said that the draft did not include a date of the so-called time horizon.
Officials said that they were discussing the goal of having all American troops, including advisers and trainers, leave by 2010, but that the time of departure would depend on conditions on the ground.
The authorization for the presence of American troops would be renewable annually so that if conditions worsened or improved, Iraqis could respond to that, according to Ayaed al-Sammaraie, [***]a Sunni leader, and several other Iraqis knowledgeable about the agreement.
The agreement is divided into three parts, said Fouad Massoun, a Kurdish member of Parliament close to the negotiations, as well as several other Iraqis. The [1] [****]first section is an uncontroversial “strategic framework agreement,” which generally lays out the future relationship between the United States and Iraq. [same info in today’s external] [***]
The [2] [****]second section is a “protocol” that includes the rules governing American troops. It would authorize the continued presence of American troops in Iraq and give them authority to conduct operations, but only with the permission of the Iraqis. This section would deal with immunity for American forces, long a central demand for American negotiators. Soldiers would continue to have immunity during authorized military operations as well as on the bases, said Ali al-Adeeb, a member of Parliament from Mr. Maliki’s Dawa party and a close adviser of Mr. Maliki.
The agreement does not make it clear how contractors would be dealt with. While the Americans have said that private security companies would no longer be immune from Iraqi law, there are many other contractors, like translators and food service workers, whose status has not been made clear.
The [3] [****]third section would be an appendix that would describe the administrative mechanism for authorizing American operations. There would be a joint Iraqi and American committee in each province that would authorize operations and a joint committee at the national level to resolve disputes.
The resolution of the rules governing detainees still appeared to be unresolved, according to several Iraqis close to the negotiations. There are two difficult issues: whether Americans will be able to detain Iraqis in the future, and what should be done with those who are being held by the United States.
American forces now hold about 22,000 Iraqi detainees at Camp Cropper in Baghdad and Camp Bucca, near the Kuwait-Iraq border. While the vast majority will never be charged under Iraqi law because there is not enough evidence to bring them to trial, the American military says that about a third remain security risks. The question remains whether and when to turn them over to the Iraqis. The vast majority are Sunni, while much of the Iraqi security force is Shiite.
Conversations with half a dozen Iraqi lawmakers made clear that the American government’s decision to bend on the issue of discussing an end date for the American military presence in Iraq played a large role in the reconciliation between the two groups of negotiators.
“The time horizon is very important for Iraq because Iraqi has no interest in keeping American forces here for a long time,” said Mr. Sammaraie, who said that the negotiators would like the withdrawal to include all forces in order to encourage all American troops to do their work efficiently. “For instance in Afghanistan they were slow to train Afghan soldiers, and now they are having all kinds of problems,” he said.
Steven Lee Myers reported from Washington and Alissa J. Rubin reported from Baghdad. Suadad al-Salhy and Riyadh Muhammed contributed reporting from Baghdad.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Bush Orders Intelligence Overhaul

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-Intelligence-Rules.html
July 31, 2008
Bush Orders Intelligence Overhaul
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 8:06 a.m. ET [bush white house] [nsc principals; NSC broadly at earliest stages] [post-IRTPA reforms] [bush realizes, finally, that the DNI has not been given the juice he needs to bend the bureaucracy to his will!] [since, then taken up by bureaucracy] [bureaucratic politics] [IC, DHS, TSA, state, defense, others] [continued need to shake up bureaucracy on occasion] [with each month since 9/11 absent another attack, the public and the bureaucracy get dangerously more apathetic] [indicative of problems persisting] [on other hand, bureaucracy can push things thoughtlessly at times and must have brake applied] [use psci 355, 455] [followup July 6 govt] [***********]
WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush has issued an executive order that revises the rules for intelligence agencies and strengthens the authority of the national intelligence director, the White House said Thursday.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-Intelligence-Rules.html
July 31, 2008
Bush Orders Intelligence Overhaul
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 8:06 a.m. ET [bush white house] [nsc principals; NSC broadly at earliest stages] [post-IRTPA reforms] [bush realizes, finally, that the DNI has not been given the juice he needs to bend the bureaucracy to his will!] [since, then taken up by bureaucracy] [bureaucratic politics] [IC, DHS, TSA, state, defense, others] [continued need to shake up bureaucracy on occasion] [with each month since 9/11 absent another attack, the public and the bureaucracy get dangerously more apathetic] [indicative of problems persisting] [on other hand, bureaucracy can push things thoughtlessly at times and must have brake applied] [use psci 355, 455] [followup July 6 govt] [***********]
WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush has issued an executive order that revises the rules for intelligence agencies and strengthens the authority of the national intelligence director, the White House said Thursday.
''The revised order directs the intelligence community to produce timely, accurate and insightful intelligence with special emphasis on the threats posed by international terrorism and the spread of weapons of mass destruction,'' White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said.
Executive Order 12333, which lays out the responsibilities of each of the 16 agencies, maintains the decades-old prohibitions on assassination and using unwitting human subjects for scientific experiments, according to a power point briefing given to Congress that was reviewed by The Associated Press. The CIA notoriously tested LSD on human subjects in the 1950s, which was revealed by a Senate investigation in 1977.
The new order gives the national intelligence director, a position created in 2005, new authority over any intelligence information collected that pertains to more than one agency -- an attempt to force greater information exchange among agencies traditionally reluctant to share their most prized intelligence. The order directs the attorney general to develop guidelines to allow agencies access to information held by other agencies. That could potentially include the sharing of sensitive information about Americans.
''Today's actions will help create a more effective intelligence community capable of providing the president and his advisers with information necessary to defend our national and homeland security,'' Perino said.
The order has been under revision for more than a year, an attempt to update a nearly 30-year-old presidential order to reflect organizational changes made in the intelligence agencies after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
It was carried on in secret in the midst of pitched national debate about the appropriate balance between civil liberties and security, spurred by the president's warrantless wiretapping program.
The briefing charts assert that the new order maintains or improves civil liberties protections for Americans.
Interest in the rewrite inside the 16 agencies has been high because it establishes what agencies' powers and limitations will be.
The order, which has not yet been publicly released, is expected to cut into one of the CIA's traditional roles. The CIA has for 50 years set the policy and largely called the shots on relationships between U.S. intelligence agencies and their foreign counterparts. According to the briefing charts, the national intelligence director will now set the rules for engaging with foreign intelligence and security services. The CIA will now just ''coordinate implementation,'' according to the briefing charts. [*******]
The order also gives the national intelligence director's office the power of the purse: It was granted the authority to make acquisition decisions on certain national intelligence programs. It is also updated to include the national intelligence director and two major defense spy agencies -- the National Reconnaissance Office, which operates spy satellites, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which analyzes imagery. It did not explain the FBI's domestic intelligence mission, which has gotten increasing attention since 9/11. [*************]
''The executive order maintains and strengthens existing protections for Americans' civil liberties and privacy rights,'' Perino said Thursday.
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press

Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073002959.html
Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering
DNI's Authority Boosted, Document Shows
By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A02 [bush white house] [nsc principals; NSC broadly at earliest stages] [post-IRTPA reforms] [bush realizes, finally, that the DNI has not been given the juice he needs to bend the bureaucracy to his will!] [since, then taken up by bureaucracy] [bureaucratic politics] [IC, DHS, TSA, state, defense, others] [continued need to shake up bureaucracy on occasion] [with each month since 9/11 absent another attack, the public and the bureaucracy get dangerously more apathetic] [indicative of problems persisting] [on other hand, bureaucracy can push things thoughtlessly at times and must have brake applied] [use psci 355, 455] [followup July 6 govt] [***********]
President Bush ordered a major restructuring of the nation's intelligence-gathering community yesterday, approving new guidelines aimed at bolstering the authority of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) as the leader of the nation's 16 spy agencies. [finally] [bipartisan leaders in congress such as susan Collins, sen warner, biden, et al., pointed this out as early as 2005] [some even before IRTPA became law in Dec 2004] [******]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073002959.html
Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering
DNI's Authority Boosted, Document Shows
By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A02 [bush white house] [nsc principals; NSC broadly at earliest stages] [post-IRTPA reforms] [bush realizes, finally, that the DNI has not been given the juice he needs to bend the bureaucracy to his will!] [since, then taken up by bureaucracy] [bureaucratic politics] [IC, DHS, TSA, state, defense, others] [continued need to shake up bureaucracy on occasion] [with each month since 9/11 absent another attack, the public and the bureaucracy get dangerously more apathetic] [indicative of problems persisting] [on other hand, bureaucracy can push things thoughtlessly at times and must have brake applied] [use psci 355, 455] [followup July 6 govt] [***********]
President Bush ordered a major restructuring of the nation's intelligence-gathering community yesterday, approving new guidelines aimed at bolstering the authority of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) as the leader of the nation's 16 spy agencies. [finally] [bipartisan leaders in congress such as susan Collins, sen warner, biden, et al., pointed this out as early as 2005] [some even before IRTPA became law in Dec 2004] [******]
The long-awaited overhaul of Executive Order 12333 gives the DNI greater control over spending and priority-setting, and also over contacts with foreign intelligence services -- a responsibility that has traditionally fallen to the CIA, [****]according to a Bush administration document describing the changes. [where’s Hayden on this?] [ironically, as head of CIA (no longer DCI) he’s been much more visible than DNI McConnell and perhaps even more than the first DNI Negroponte] [********]
Executive Order 12333, which was originally issued by President Ronald Regan in 1981, established the powers and responsibilities of the major U.S. intelligence services. Administration officials have been quietly negotiating the overhaul for more than a year, [*****] seeking to modernize the law to reflect the new role of the DNI as the head of the intelligence community. The DNI was created by Congress three years ago in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, but critics have charged that the agency was not given the budgetary and policy-setting authorities it needs to lead the intelligence community. [******]
Details of the revamped order were expected to be unveiled by the White House today, but a summary of the major changes was spelled out in a White House PowerPoint presentation shared in advance with congressional oversight committees. The eight-page slide presentation was obtained by The Washington Post.
The main purpose of the reforms was to "clarify and strengthen the role of the DNI as head of the intelligence community," the presentation states. The new order gives the DNI primary authority to issue "overarching policies and procedures" and to ensure that intelligence collection is coordinated among the 16 agencies. It also conveys greater power to set spending priorities and establish standards for training and tradecraft. [all that was in IRTPA but the bureaucracy is ever resistant to change] [*****]
In one of the more controversial changes, the new order allows the DNI to formulate policy for engaging with the intelligence agencies and security services of other countries -- a role traditionally held by the CIA. But the new policy stipulates that the CIA would "coordinate implementation" of those policies.
Left essentially unchanged is a prohibition against assassinations of foreign leaders, as well as long-standing restrictions on "human experimentation," the document states. It asserts that the intelligence community would "maintain or strengthen privacy and civil liberty protections." [except when the IC doesn’t?] [like TSPs under Bush] [***]
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Lawyers for Detainee Assert Coercion

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/us/31gitmo.html
July 31, 2008
Lawyers for Detainee Assert Coercion
By WILLIAM GLABERSON [bush white house] [NSC principals-deputies levels?] [bureaucracy] [dod] [ongoing repercussion of gitmo, abu Ghraib, Baghram, and black sites] [potential pow abuse] [recall the DOJ’s IG report on same in June?] [though relatively infrequent, it seems nearly indisputable that CIA and some military elements used Geneva III banned procedures] [additional trouble from extraordinary renditions] [followup] [congrerss] [110th congress, 2nd session] [past oversight of congressional oversight] [followup] [federal judiciary] [surpreme court’s ruling affecting process] [traditional internationalist versus neocons (Vulcans)] [******]
GUANTÁNAMO BAY, Cuba — A secret government document submitted at the trial of the first detainee to face a war crimes trial confirms the detainee’s account of having been sexually humiliated while interrogated by a female government agent, [***] defense lawyers said at the tribunal here on Wednesday.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/us/31gitmo.html
July 31, 2008
Lawyers for Detainee Assert Coercion
By WILLIAM GLABERSON [bush white house] [NSC principals-deputies levels?] [bureaucracy] [dod] [ongoing repercussion of gitmo, abu Ghraib, Baghram, and black sites] [potential pow abuse] [recall the DOJ’s IG report on same in June?] [though relatively infrequent, it seems nearly indisputable that CIA and some military elements used Geneva III banned procedures] [additional trouble from extraordinary renditions] [followup] [congrerss] [110th congress, 2nd session] [past oversight of congressional oversight] [followup] [federal judiciary] [surpreme court’s ruling affecting process] [traditional internationalist versus neocons (Vulcans)] [******]
GUANTÁNAMO BAY, Cuba — A secret government document submitted at the trial of the first detainee to face a war crimes trial confirms the detainee’s account of having been sexually humiliated while interrogated by a female government agent, [***] defense lawyers said at the tribunal here on Wednesday.
The lawyers described the document as an account by the unidentified agent and said it bolstered their claim that their client, Salim Hamdan, was subjected to measures at Guantánamo including late-night interrogations that amounted to coercion. [***]
One of the lawyers, Harry H. Schneider Jr., said in the courtroom that Mr. Hamdan was “right on the money” in his description of a female interrogator’s physical contact with him in a way that a Muslim man would find nearly unbearable. [****]
Without referring specifically to the document by the female interrogator, one prosecutor argued that there was no evidence of coercion. He said assertions of coercive interrogations at Guantánamo have cast a public cloud over the war-crimes proceedings here that he said was unjustified.
“It casts a sort of black cloud over the agents and those who work with detainees, and what’s been put forth doesn’t show it,” [****]said the prosecutor, John Murphy.
Prosecutors said they disputed any characterization that Mr. Hamdan had been sexually humiliated.
The arguments on Wednesday occurred in a hearing at which the military judge said he was considering barring the testimony of a federal agent about a 2003 interrogation at which prosecutors say Mr. Hamdan conceded that he had once sworn allegiance to Osama bin Laden, the Al Qaeda leader for whom he was a driver. [******]
The defense lawyers said the secret document was among 1,200 pages provided to the defense on the eve of the trial, months after a military judge ordered that they be turned over.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Gates Sees Terrorism Remaining Enemy No. 1

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073003240.html
Gates Sees Terrorism Remaining Enemy No. 1
New Defense Strategy Shifts Focus From Conventional Warfare
By Josh White
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A01 [bush white house] [NSC principal] [sec def Robert Gates] [gsave will continue well beyond –iraq and Afghanistan] [use psci350, 355, 455] [use nsc] [use hydra II] [*********]
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates says that even winning the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan will not end the "Long War" against violent extremism and that the fight against al-Qaeda and other terrorists should be the nation's top military priority over coming decades, [*****]according to a new National Defense Strategy he approved last month. [is this classified or public?] [****]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073003240.html
Gates Sees Terrorism Remaining Enemy No. 1
New Defense Strategy Shifts Focus From Conventional Warfare
By Josh White
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A01 [bush white house] [NSC principal] [sec def Robert Gates] [gsave will continue well beyond –iraq and Afghanistan] [use psci350, 355, 455] [use nsc] [use hydra II] [*********]
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates says that even winning the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan will not end the "Long War" against violent extremism and that the fight against al-Qaeda and other terrorists should be the nation's top military priority over coming decades, [*****]according to a new National Defense Strategy he approved last month. [is this classified or public?] [****]
The strategy document, which has not been released, calls for the military to master "irregular" warfare rather than focusing on conventional conflicts against other nations, though Gates also recommends partnering with China and Russia in order to blunt their rise as potential adversaries. [smart] [***] [gates has always represented the cold war consensus of bipartisan foreign policy] [****] The strategy is a culmination of Gates's work since he took over the Pentagon in late 2006 and spells out his view that the nation must harness both military assets and "soft power" to defeat a complex, transnational foe. [*******]
"Iraq and Afghanistan remain the central fronts in the struggle, but we cannot lose sight of the implications of fighting a long-term, episodic, multi-front, and multi-dimensional conflict more complex and diverse than the Cold War confrontation with communism," according to the 23-page document, [thank god somebody in the administration has finally given this some thought] [****] provided to The Washington Post by InsideDefense.com, a defense industry news service. "Success in Iraq and Afghanistan is crucial to winning this conflict, but it alone will not bring victory." [*****]
Gates embraces the "Long War" term that his predecessor, Donald H. Rumsfeld, invoked to equate the fight against terrorism with struggles against Soviet communism and Nazi fascism. His strategy, however, departs from Rumsfeld's focus on preemptive military action and instead encourages current and future U.S. leaders to work with other countries to eliminate the conditions that foster extremism. [about time] [does US want regime change or behavior change?] [clearly the latter in most cases] [preemption tends to direct US to former] [******]
"The use of force plays a role, yet military efforts to capture or kill terrorists are likely to be subordinate to measures to promote local participation in government and economic programs to spur development, as well as efforts to understand and address the grievances that often lie at the heart of insurgencies," the document said. "For these reasons, arguably the most important military component of the struggle against violent extremists is not the fighting we do ourselves, but how well we help prepare our partners to defend and govern themselves."
It is unusual for a defense secretary to offer a comprehensive military strategy so late in an administration's tenure, and in a foreword to the document Gates acknowledges that a new president will soon reassess threats and priorities. Gates wrote that he perceives this document as a "a blueprint to success" for a future administration. [******]
Michele Flournoy, president of the Center for a New American Security, said she was surprised to see Gates issuing such a strategy so close to a presidential election, calling it a "strategy destined to be overtaken by events" because one of the new administration's first tasks will be to write such a defense plan. She said the document appropriately emphasizes irregular warfare -- focused on terrorists and rogue regimes bent on using insurgency or weapons of mass destruction -- but might go too far. [we shall see in due course] [******]
"I think irregular warfare is very important, particularly in contrast to preparing solely for conventional warfighting, but it shouldn't be our only focus," Flournoy said, adding that countries such as China likely are preparing for "high-end" warfare and attacks involving anti-satellite technologies and cyberspace. [strawman: clearly neither does Gates] [***]
The Defense Department has not officially released the National Defense Strategy -- which lays out a general plan for the Pentagon to deal with major threats and was last issued in 2005 -- but officials recently have provided copies to the House and Senate armed services committees. Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said the document distills what Gates has been saying in speeches over the past few months, that "we ought to be training our forces and procuring our weapons systems to reflect the reality" of likely future conflicts. [******]
Defense sources said Gates's strategy met resistance among the Joint Chiefs of Staff because of its focus on irregular warfare. Gates met with the Joint Chiefs to present the rationale behind his strategy, and they expressed concerns over the long-term risks of shifting the focus too far from conventional threats. [***]The service chiefs have worried publicly about shunning preparation for conventional warfare because it could give adversaries a competitive advantage in key arenas, such as in the skies or in space. [as well they should] [*****]
"The chiefs were provided an opportunity to review the document by the secretary," said Navy Capt. John Kirby, a spokesman for Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs. "They were grateful, and they did provide comment and are comfortable with the final product." [*******]
The Joint Chiefs separately prepare a biannual National Military Strategy for the armed forces, and Kirby said it is still being crafted and edited.
Gates singles out Iran and North Korea as threatening "international order" and meriting U.S. concern; his strategy also warns about potential threats from China and Russia, and he urges the United States to build "collaborative and cooperative relationships" with them while hedging against their increasing military capabilities.n [classic Realpolitik] [****] Gates also points to India as an ally he hopes will "assume greater responsibility as a stakeholder in the international system, commensurate with its growing economic, military, and soft power."
The strategy calls on the U.S. military to balance its risk between irregular threats and conventional warfare involving competing armies and Cold War-style standoffs. Gates says the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan exemplify the type of conflict the United States will face in the years ahead. [******]
"U.S. predominance in traditional warfare is not unchallenged, but is sustainable for the medium term given current trends," the document says. "We will continue to focus our investments on building capabilities to address these other challenges, while examining areas where we can assume greater risk." [******]
James Jay Carafano, a military expert at the Heritage Foundation, said he finds it refreshing that the Defense Department acknowledges that China and Russia are potential adversaries, but he said he believes the strategy is too heavy on battling extremism. [*******]
"It is overstating the case to say that extremist Islamic ideology is going to define the next 20 or 30 years," [my impression is that it will shape the next 5-10 years and I think that’s Gate’s view as well] [*****] he said. "I think that's not helpful because you're sacrificing everything for this one fight. But it's a transition document. Either McCain or Obama could walk in the door and live with that document and do all kinds of things."
Staff researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Aircraft Carriers Are Crucial

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073003078.html
Aircraft Carriers Are Crucial
By Mackenzie Eaglen
From the Heritage Foundation
Thursday, July 31, 2008; 12:00 AM [oped] [navy] [US military strategy] [national-security policy] [the import of the aircraft carrier] [use psci355, 455] [use nsc] [**]
On May 22, a serious fire broke out on the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier George Washington [sic] [***]as it sailed to relieve the forward-deployed Kitty Hawk in the western Pacific Ocean.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073003078.html
Aircraft Carriers Are Crucial
By Mackenzie Eaglen
From the Heritage Foundation
Thursday, July 31, 2008; 12:00 AM [oped] [navy] [US military strategy] [national-security policy] [the import of the aircraft carrier] [use psci355, 455] [use nsc] [**]
On May 22, a serious fire broke out on the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier George Washington [sic] [***]as it sailed to relieve the forward-deployed Kitty Hawk in the western Pacific Ocean.
It might take all summer to repair the ship, so the planned decommissioning of the Kitty Hawk is on hold. Instead, it's now one of 40 ships from the United States, Chile, Canada, South Korea, Australia and Japan taking part in this year's Rim of the Pacific exercise.
In an age of guerrilla warfare and counterinsurgency operations, many U.S. officials appear content to overlook the importance of conventional weapons such as the aircraft carrier. That's a serious mistake. [it surely is] [the US must be able to do 2 things at once: fight non-state actors and traditional state enemies who threaten US interests] [***]
For any U.S. president, the aircraft carrier embodies the ultimate crisis management tool. Continuously deployed throughout the globe, carrier-strike groups give our military unparalleled freedom of action to respond to a range of combat and non-combat missions. The recent George Washington incident only further emphasizes the significance of maintaining a robust carrier fleet, one large enough to meet all contingencies and "surge" in crises, no matter what may happen.
Carriers can move large contingents of forces and their support to distant theaters, respond rapidly to changing tactical situations, support several missions simultaneously, and, perhaps most importantly, guarantee access to any region in the world. [****] [they are also vulnerable in choke points such as Straits of Hormutz] [***]
In a time when America's political relationships with other countries can shift almost overnight, aircraft carriers can reduce America's reliance on others -- often including suspect regimes -- for basing rights. A carrier's air wing can typically support 125 sorties a day at a distance up to 750 nautical miles. They also operate as a hub in the strike group's command, control, communications and intelligence network, playing an increasingly larger role in controlling the battlespace at sea.
Whether in a direct or support role, carriers have taken part in almost every major military operation the U.S. has undertaken since the Second World War. They also serve as first-rate diplomatic tools to either heighten or ease political pressure. When tensions with North Korea or Iran increase, a carrier, or sometimes two, is sent to patrol off their coast. And when an election takes place in a nascent democracy or country central to U.S. interests, a strike group typically is sailing offshore.
In March, when Taiwan held important presidential elections that will chart the future of that country's relationship with China, both the Kitty Hawk and Nimitz trolled nearby to ensure a smooth transition of events and deliver a psychological message of U.S. interest.
And at a time when policymakers expect to spend less on defense and where the services' lists of unfunded requirements continues to mount, we'll likely call on the aircraft carrier to perform an expanded array of duties, ranging from humanitarian relief to counterinsurgency support and temporary basing for Special Operations Forces.
As the Navy assumes responsibility for humanitarian missions in places such as Africa and South America, it will rely on aircraft carriers to provide immediate relief following natural disasters. During Operation Unified Assistance, following the December 2004 tsunami and during relief efforts following Hurricane Katrina, [***]for instance, they placed a central role.
For these enduring reasons, both the Congress and the Navy must work to ensure that a sufficient number of aircraft carriers remain in operation. During the Reagan years, the Navy maintained 15 carriers. In FY 2006, Congress required the Navy maintain at least 12 carriers.
However officials allowed this number to drop to 11 -- the current number -- in the FY 2007 budget [***] to accommodate the retirement of the John F. Kennedy. Although the Kitty Hawk is expected to begin decommissioning in the coming months, it will be replaced later this year by the George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), the last of the Nimitz-class line.
To maintain 11 carriers, the Navy will have to procure seven CVN-78 Gerald R. Ford class aircraft carriers between 2009 and 2038. Under current plans, however, a shortfall to 10 carriers is projected to occur between November 2012, when the Navy decommissions [****]the Enterprise, and September 2015, when the Gerald R. Ford is expected to be commissioned.
In reality, this projected three-year gap will be longer, perhaps much longer. [***]Not only will it take an additional 30 months for the Ford to become operationally ready to deploy after commissioning, but in all likelihood construction delays will push back the planned commissioning date even further. The result could be a five- or six-year period where the Navy has only 10 carriers. [*******] [probably would be more critical were this gap to occure in 20-to-30] [but his outer boundry of 2038 is a little frightening]
Yet in the past half-century, carrier levels have never fallen below 12 ships. It's no surprise that a recent RAND report concluded that "this gap will severely strain the navy's ability to meet the forward-presence requirements of theatre commanders." [***]
Nevertheless, this year the Navy again asked Congress to waive the legislative mandate of 11 carriers to accommodate the upcoming six-year gap. The House Armed Services Committee, already having acknowledged that "a reduction below 12 aircraft carriers puts the nation in a position of unacceptable risk," chose wisely to reject the Navy's request. [*****]
The committee further directed the Secretary of the Navy to submit a report by next February reviewing potential options, including either returning the retired John F. Kennedy to service or maintaining the Kitty Hawk until the completion of Gerald Ford. Officials should also consider accelerating the delivery of the Ford to the 2013-2014 timeframe. [*****]
In the meantime, the Navy should take two additional steps to help surge aircraft carrier capacity. [*****]
The Navy has structured its Fleet Response Plan to uphold its goal of a "6+1 fleet" -- in which at least six carriers are deployed (or able to deploy) within 30 days, and a seventh can be deployed within 90 days. [***]Under the current plan, the Navy uses a 32-month operational cycle consisting of one six-month deployment.
Each carrier, then, is deployed for only a limited time within a cycle. Yet with fewer ships and more needs, aircraft carrier capacity is stretched to its limit. As the RAND report suggested, the Navy should consider extending the Fleet Response Plan to a 42-month/two-deployment cycle. This would allow the Navy to project power while also meeting the full requirements of the "6+1 fleet" plan. [********]
The Navy also should look to homeport additional carriers in either Hawaii or Guam. [***] For the past decade the only carrier home-ported outside the continental United States has been the Kitty Hawk in Yokosuka, Japan. From California, it can take two weeks for a carrier strike group to travel to East Asia and three weeks to reach the Persian Gulf. Shaving off this time by positioning a carrier in Guam, for example, would allow ships to respond more quickly to unforeseen crises. [******]
It's time to give aircraft carriers their due. They're not weapons platforms from a bygone era, but rather flexible tools of national security that can offer a vast array of capabilities. Congress was correct to stop the Navy from reducing the carrier fleet below the already-low level of 11 carriers. Now it must be prepared to back up its foresightedness by funding whichever option the Navy determines best for managing the looming Enterprise/Ford shortfall. When the question is, "where are the carriers?" we need to ensure the answer is, "plentiful, and ready to serve."
Mackenzie Eaglen is Senior Policy Analyst for National Security at The Heritage Foundation (heritage.org).
© 2008 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive

New Premises in Iraq

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073002947.html
New Premises in Iraq
Prospects for Withdrawal Have to Be Viewed Through the Lens of Progress
By Henry A. Kissinger
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A19 [oped] [prince henry speaks on –iraq] [again]
The U.S. presidential campaign has been so long and so intense that it seems to operate in a cocoon, oblivious to changes that should alter its premises. A striking example is the debate over withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq. [******]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073002947.html
New Premises in Iraq
Prospects for Withdrawal Have to Be Viewed Through the Lens of Progress
By Henry A. Kissinger
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A19 [oped] [prince henry speaks on –iraq] [again]
The U.S. presidential campaign has been so long and so intense that it seems to operate in a cocoon, oblivious to changes that should alter its premises. A striking example is the debate over withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq. [******]
Over the past year, many have proposed setting a deadline for withdrawal. Proponents have argued that a date certain would compel the Iraqi government to accelerate the policy of reconciliation; would speed the end of the war; and would enable the United States to concentrate its efforts on more strategically important regions, such as Afghanistan. Above all, they argued, the war was lost, and withdrawal would represent the least costly way to deal with the debacle. [****]
These premises have been overtaken by events. Almost all objective observers agree that major progress has been made on all three fronts of the Iraq war: Al-Qaeda, the Sunni jihadist force recruited largely from outside the country, seems on the run in Iraq; [***] the indigenous Sunni insurrection attempting to restore Sunni predominance has largely died down; and the Shiite-dominated government in Baghdad has, at least temporarily, mastered the Shiite militias that were challenging its authority. After years of disappointment, we face the need to shift gears mentally to consider emerging prospects of success. [*****]
Of course, we cannot tell now whether these changes are permanent or whether, and to what extent, they reflect a decision by our adversaries, including Iran, to husband their forces for the aftermath of the Bush administration. [***]But we do know that the outcome of the conflict will determine the kind of world in which the new administration will have to conduct its policies. Any appearance that radical Islamic forces were responsible for a U.S. defeat would have enormous destabilizing consequences far beyond the region. How and when to leave Iraq will therefore emerge as a principal decision for the new president.
Whatever the interpretation of recent events, the Sunni part of Iraq has created local forces backed by several Sunni states to fight al-Qaeda and indigenous insurgents. [****] These, in turn, have contributed to easing Sunni concerns over being marginalized by the Shiite majority. All along, the Kurdish region has developed its own self-defense forces.
In this manner, prospects for reconciliation among the three parts of the country, Kurdish, Shiite and Sunni, have appeared not through legislation, as congressional resolutions applying the American experience imagined, but by necessity and a measure of military and political equilibrium. [agreed] [good point to remember] [but also suggests that what I’ve frequently noted in these pages is possible] [out of –iraq’s own dynamics, the Sunni minority who lorded over Shi’ia majority for so long will want a larger slice than is due them by percentage of –iraq’s population] [thus, a matter of time till those Awakening Councils turn on Shi’ia brothern in power] [and, US has armed them to the teeth!] [******] Since the need for American forces in dealing with a massive insurrection has diminished, they can increasingly concentrate on helping the Iraqi government resist pressures from neighbors and the occasional flare-up of terrorist attacks from al-Qaeda or Iranian-backed militias. [****]In that environment, the various national and provincial elections foreseen for the next months in Iraq's constitution can help shape new Iraqi institutions.[****]
A strategic reserve can now be created by the United States out of some of the forces currently in Iraq, with some moving to other threatened areas and others returning to the United States. [agreed] [let’s see if Patraeus, once he becomes CENTCINC recommends same] [*****] American deployment is transformed from abdication into part of a geopolitical design. Its culmination should be a diplomatic conference charged with establishing a formal peace settlement. Such a conference was first assembled two years ago on the foreign ministers' level. It was composed of all of Iraq's neighbors, including Iran and Syria; Egypt; and the permanent members of the U.N. Security Council. That conference should be reassembled and charged with defining an international status for Iraq and the guarantees to enforce it. [*****] [HK on multilateral diplomacy] [he’s been listening to Dems?] [*****]
In addition, regional efforts to stabilize the situation are underway. Turkey is seeking to mediate between Israel and Syria; a Qatari initiative has achieved at least a temporary pause in the fighting in Lebanon. [***]
Establishing a deadline is the surest way to undermine the hopeful prospects. [***] [here I take some issue as an effective deadline has already been created] [military fatigue resulting form being stretched in –iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere necesicates bringing brigades home] [train and refit imperatives] [*] It will encourage largely defeated internal groups to go underground until a world more congenial to their survival arises with the departure of American forces. Al-Qaeda will have a deadline against which to plan a full-scale resumption of operations. And it will give Iran an incentive to strengthen its supporters in the Shiite community for the period after the American withdrawal. Establishing a fixed deadline would also dissipate assets needed for the diplomatic endgame.
The inherent contradictions of the proposed withdrawal schedule compound the difficulties. Under the fixed withdrawal scheme, combat troops are to be withdrawn, but sufficient forces would remain to protect the U.S. Embassy, fight a resumption of al-Qaeda and contribute to defense against outside intervention. But such tasks require combat, not support, forces, and the foreseeable controversy about the elusive distinction will distract from the overall diplomatic goal. Nor is withdrawal from Iraq necessary to free forces for operations in Afghanistan. [****]There is no need to risk the effort in Iraq to send two or three additional brigades to Afghanistan; those troops will become available even in the absence of a deadline. (It should be noted that I am a friend of Sen. John McCain and occasionally advise him.) [no kidding] [******]
In a positive gesture, leading advocates of a fixed deadline, including Sen. Barack Obama, have recently put forward the idea that both withdrawal and the residual force will be condition-based. But if that is the case, why establish a deadline at all? It would suggest shifting the debate to the conditions for withdrawal rather than its timing. [***] [the simple reason is if one does not set a goal, one continually misses ever measuring progress against the goal] [*****]
These considerations explain Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's conduct on the occasion of Obama's visit to Iraq. Maliki is negotiating with the Bush administration about a status-of-forces agreement for the residual forces to remain in Iraq. Given popular attitudes and the imminence of provincial elections, he probably wanted to convey that the American presence was not planned as a permanent occupation. [absolutely agree] [but that also demonstrates how unpopular America’s presence is there] [the US cannot stay indifinetly if a sovereign Iraq wants the US out!] [****] The accident of the arrival of a presidential candidate, who had already-published views on that subject, reinforced that incentive. To reject the senator's withdrawal plan in front of a large media contingent would have been to antagonize someone with whom Maliki might have to deal as president.
The American presence in Iraq should not be presented as open-ended; this would not be supported by either Iraqi or American domestic opinion. But neither should it be put forward in terms of rigid deadlines. [nor is it] [strawman somewhat] [***] Striking this balance is a way for our country to come together as a constructive outcome emerges. Thirty years ago, Congress cut off aid to Vietnam and Cambodia two years after American troops had been withdrawn and local forces were still desperate to resist. Domestic divisions had overcome all other considerations. We must not repeat the tragedy that followed.
The next president has a great opportunity to stabilize Iraq and lay the basis for a decisive turn in the war against jihadist radicalism and for a more peaceful Middle East. Surely he will want to assess the situation on the ground before setting a strategy for his term. He should not be limited by rigid prescriptions to vindicate maxims of the past, no matter how plausible they once seemed. Withdrawal is a means; the end is a more peaceful and hopeful world.
The writer was secretary of state from 1973 to 1977.
© 2008 Tribune Media Services Inc.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

The Laws Cops Can’t Enforce

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/opinion/31gascon.html
July 31, 2008
Op-Ed Contributor
The Laws Cops Can’t Enforce
By GEORGE GASCÓN
Mesa, Ariz. [oped] [immigration laws] [problematic for police] [*******]
OUR next president faces a formidable task. He will be forced to deal with two difficult wars, an economic downturn, higher energy prices and a bankrupt federal immigration policy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/opinion/31gascon.html
July 31, 2008
Op-Ed Contributor
The Laws Cops Can’t Enforce
By GEORGE GASCÓN
Mesa, Ariz. [oped] [immigration laws] [problematic for police] [*******]
OUR next president faces a formidable task. He will be forced to deal with two difficult wars, an economic downturn, higher energy prices and a bankrupt federal immigration policy.
To some, immigration pales in comparison with the wars and the economy. But for others, especially police departments in border states like mine, it is all-consuming. [***]The first priority of the next president should be legislation that addresses the legitimate concerns of both the people who believe our borders are out of control and those who want equal protection for everyone living in this country. [******]
Immigration issues are tearing apart communities. Demagoguery and misinformation are shaping public opinion and in some cases public policy. In the absence of a clear federal policy on immigration, states and cities are enacting draconian and constitutionally questionable laws. [**********]
This patchwork of conflicting local immigration laws is creating an untenable situation for police officials who face demands to crack down on immigrants — demands that contradict policing practices that have led to significant declines in crime. [****]
For police officials, refusing to carry out policies that may violate the Constitution can be career-threatening. Both sides in the immigration debate accuse police departments of misconduct in dealing with immigrants. In this politically charged environment, some chiefs are making decisions based on bad politics instead of sound policing. In many cases, police officers are making illegal arrests with the acquiescence and sometimes explicit approval of their superiors.
Here in Arizona, a wedge is being driven between the local police and some immigrant groups. Some law enforcement agencies are wasting limited resources in operations to appease the public’s thirst for action against illegal immigration regardless of the legal or social consequences.
America’s 500,000 police officers are sworn to enforce the law. But we are increasingly unable to do so. Those who want to restrict immigration criticize us for not arresting immigrants for entering the country illegally. Yet others rightly wonder how we can do our job if some residents are afraid to report crimes or otherwise cooperate with the police for fear of deportation. [*******]
Without a national immigration policy, a new culture of lawlessness will increasingly permeate our society. [***]In cities, politicians will pressure police departments to reduce immigration by using racial profiling and harassment. At the same time, immigrants who fear that the police will help deport them will rely less on their local officers and instead give thugs control of their neighborhoods.
Many top law enforcement officials were part of the community policing revolution of the 1980s and ’90s. We have a deep concern for constitutional rights and social justice. We believe that effective policing requires residents, regardless of immigration status, to trust the police. [******]
We are also students of the mistakes of our predecessors. Past police practices helped lead to the civil unrest of the 1960s, which tore our nation apart along racial and political lines. We do not want to repeat those mistakes. [****]
If we become a nation in which the local police are the default enforcers of a failing federal immigration policy, the years of trust that police departments have built up in immigrant communities will vanish. Some minority groups may once again view police officers as armed instruments of government oppression.
A wink and a nod will no longer suffice as an immigration policy. Effective border control is a critical step. But so is ensuring that otherwise law-abiding undocumented immigrants have the same protections as everyone else in a modern, free society.
Presidential candidates need to specify the measures on immigration they would present to Congress after Inauguration Day. No doubt, the advisers to John McCain and Barack Obama are counseling them to be vague. That’s the wrong advice.
America’s police officers deserve thoughtful federal leadership so that we can continue doing our best to provide our country with the security that defines a civilized society.
George Gascón, a former assistant chief in the Los Angeles Police Department, is a lawyer and the chief of the police department in Mesa, Ariz.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

More Pressure on Beijing

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/opinion/31thu2.html
July 31, 2008
Editorial
More Pressure on Beijing
[editorial] [China] [8-8-08] [bush’s meeting with dissidents] [*******]
President Bush is finally beginning to complain — gingerly — about China’s disgraceful wave of pre-Olympics repression. With the start of the 2008 Games less than two weeks away, we hope that he keeps speaking out and enlists others to join him, including world and corporate leaders and the International Olympic Committee [***]— if that troubled organization is not already beyond redemption. [today’s external suggests it may be beyond redemption] [******]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/opinion/31thu2.html
July 31, 2008
Editorial
More Pressure on Beijing
[editorial] [China] [8-8-08] [bush’s meeting with dissidents] [*******]
President Bush is finally beginning to complain — gingerly — about China’s disgraceful wave of pre-Olympics repression. With the start of the 2008 Games less than two weeks away, we hope that he keeps speaking out and enlists others to join him, including world and corporate leaders and the International Olympic Committee [***]— if that troubled organization is not already beyond redemption. [today’s external suggests it may be beyond redemption] [******]
After playing Beijing’s game and declining to condemn China’s latest crackdown on critics and journalists, Mr. Bush deserves credit for holding talks on Tuesday with five prominent Chinese dissidents. [agreed] [but rebuking China publicly will improve nothing] [******]
Although the meeting was private, the White House announced it and said that President Bush spoke of his “concerns” about human rights in China. Mr. Bush also attended a separate meeting between his national security adviser and the Chinese foreign minister and advised how the Olympics present an “opportunity to demonstrate compassion on human rights and freedom.” [*****]
The problem is that Mr. Bush’s approach is still too deferential given China’s reprehensible and defiant behavior. [delicate balance between deferential and congnizant of China’s ethos, so forth] [***] On Wednesday, authorities confirmed that they will censor the Internet during the Games, violating previous assurances. Foreign journalists have already found that they could not reach sites like Amnesty International and Radio Free Asia.
Making matters worse, the I.O.C., which has enabled China at every step, apparently acquiesced in Web sites being blocked. Those responsible for such a disgraceful deal should be forced to resign. The committee must demand that China live up to its pre-Games pledges.
To win the coveted right to hold the Olympics, China promised to expand press freedoms for foreign journalists and dangled the prospect that, more broadly, human rights might also be improved. Instead, authorities have harassed and locked up critics, intimidated journalists, selectively denied visas, silenced grieving parents who lost children in the May 12 earthquake and relocated thousands of Chinese whose homes or businesses were seen as marring Beijing’s image.
President Bush cannot go to the Olympics in silence next week. As the House of Representatives said in a resolution, approved 419 to 1, he must insist that China act immediately to cease rights abuses, allow promised press freedoms and permit peaceful political activities during the Games.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

McCain Tries to Define Obama as Out of Touch

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/us/politics/31campaign.html
July 31, 2008
McCain Tries to Define Obama as Out of Touch
By JIM RUTENBERG [societal] [election-year politics] [approaching conventions] [99 days remain before Nov 4 election] [tit-for-tat mudslinging from both camps ] [followup to yesterday’s societal] [***]
WASHINGTON — After spending much of the summer searching for an effective line of attack against Senator Barack Obama, Senator John McCain is beginning a newly aggressive campaign to define Mr. Obama as arrogant, out of touch and unprepared for the presidency. [*****]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/us/politics/31campaign.html
July 31, 2008
McCain Tries to Define Obama as Out of Touch
By JIM RUTENBERG [societal] [election-year politics] [approaching conventions] [99 days remain before Nov 4 election] [tit-for-tat mudslinging from both camps ] [followup to yesterday’s societal] [***]
WASHINGTON — After spending much of the summer searching for an effective line of attack against Senator Barack Obama, Senator John McCain is beginning a newly aggressive campaign to define Mr. Obama as arrogant, out of touch and unprepared for the presidency. [*****]
On Wednesday alone, the McCain campaign released a new advertisement suggesting — and not in a good way — that Mr. Obama was a celebrity along the lines of Britney Spears and Paris Hilton. Republicans tried to portray Mr. Obama as a candidate who believed the race was all about him, relying on what Democrats said was a completely inaccurate quotation. [*****]
The Republican National Committee began an anti-Obama Web site called “Audacity Watch,” a play on the title of Mr. Obama’s book “The Audacity of Hope.” [***]And, in a concerted volley of television interviews, news releases and e-mail, campaign representatives attacked him on a wide range of issues, including tax policies and energy proposals.
The moves are the McCain campaign’s most full-throttled effort to define Mr. Obama negatively, on its own terms, by creating a narrative intended to turn the public off to an opponent. [********]
Although Mr. Obama has been under an intense public spotlight for the last year, he is still relatively new on the national scene, and polls indicate that for all the enthusiasm he has generated among his supporters, many voters still have questions about him, providing Republicans an opening to shape his image in critical groups like white working-class voters between now and Election Day. [******]
Mr. McCain’s campaign is now under the leadership of members of President Bush’s re-election campaign, including Steve Schmidt, the czar of the Bush war room that relentlessly painted his opponent, Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, as effete, elite, and equivocal through a daily blitz of sound bites and Web videos that were carefully coordinated with Mr. Bush’s television advertisements. [*******]
The run of attacks against Mr. Obama over the last couple of weeks have been strikingly reminiscent of that drive, including the Bush team’s tactics of seeking to make campaigns referendums on its opponents — not a choice between two candidates — and attacking the opponent’s perceived strengths head-on. [Rovian] [*****] Central to the latest McCain drive is an attempt to use against Mr. Obama the huge crowds and excitement he has drawn, including on his foreign trip last week, by promoting a view of him as more interested in attention and adulation than in solving the problems facing American families.
“I would say that it is beyond dispute that he has become the biggest celebrity in the world,” Mr. Schmidt said in a conference call with reporters on Wednesday. “The question that we are posing to the American people is this: ‘Is he ready to lead yet?’ And the answer to the question that we will offer to the American people is: ‘No he is not.’ ”
Mr. McCain’s more focused assault comes after one of his worst weeks of the general election campaign, when he seemed to fumble for a consistent, overarching critique of Mr. Obama, who winged around the Middle East and Europe. [***] Mr. McCain’s advisers continue to look for ways to bring more discipline to his message, and are being urged by some supporters to cut back the frequency of his question-and-answer sessions with reporters, a staple of his campaign but one that occasionally yields unscripted moments, misstatements and off-the-cuff pronouncements that divert attention from the themes he is trying to promote. [with the interesting results that one of his principal spokespersons effectively said McCain was not speaking for the campaign recently!] [**]
The intensity of the recent drive — which has included some assertions from the McCain campaign that have been widely dismissed as misleading — has surprised even some allies of Mr. McCain, who has frequently spoken about the need for civility in politics. The sentiment seeped onto television on Wednesday with Andrea Tantaros, a Republican strategist, saying on MSNBC that the use of Ms. Hilton in Mr. McCain’s commercial was “absurd and juvenile,” and that he should spend more time promoting his own agenda.
Mr. Obama’s campaign seized on those concerns, trying to turn the tables by portraying Mr. McCain as cranky and negative. [***] The Democratic National Committee called Mr. McCain “McNasty.” Late Wednesday Mr. Obama released a counter advertisement citing editorials critical of Mr. McCain’s latest volley of attacks and featuring an announcer who says, “John McCain, Same old politics, same failed policies.” [**]
Asked by reporters about Mr. McCain’s new advertisement, Mr. Obama said, “I do notice that he doesn’t seem to have anything to say very positive about himself.”
Mr. Obama’s chief strategist, David Axelrod, said that Mr. McCain’s strategy to define Mr. Obama negatively in voters’ minds, while similar to one that successfully worked against Mr. Kerry, would not work this year. [he hopes] [***]
“When people are struggling, when they’re trying to pay their bills, when they’re concerned about their fundamental security, I don’t think they have much tolerance for Britney Spears and Paris Hilton,” Mr. Axelrod said. “I think they understand times are more serious than that, and they thought John McCain was, too.”
Mr. Schmidt, whom Mr. McCain placed in charge of day-to-day operations this month, specialized during the 2004 campaign in seizing on opportunities — think windsurfing; seemingly contradictory votes on Iraq policy — to paint Mr. Kerry negatively.
Seeking similar openings, the campaign seized on Mr. Obama’s decision to skip a visit with wounded United States troops in Germany. (The McCain campaign said Mr. Obama canceled because he could not take the news media with him to the hospital, an assertion denied by the Obama campaign and undercut by the accounts of reporters.) [for the story visit Lynn Sween’s Chicago Sun Times blog] [she inaccurately created what she believed at the time was an accurate headline] [corrected soon thereafter but two versions exisgted] [so on] [******] [http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/07/more_to_the_storya_clarificati.html]
The new focus has been welcomed by some Republicans. “They’re now in a position of driving news as opposed to reacting to it,” said Brian Jones, a former aide to Mr. McCain.
But some fear a backlash. And Mr. McCain does not like to follow a script. People who know him said that it may be a challenge to apply the Bush model — strict adherence to the message of the day by the candidate combined with a relentless drive to define the opponent negatively — to a campaign not known so far for discipline or consistency.
“It could be the Coca-Cola strategy of marketing that they’re trying to apply to Dr Pepper,” said John Weaver, a former chief strategist for Mr. McCain.
Michael Powell contributed reporting from Lebanon, Mo., and Jeff Zeleny from Washington.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Trying to Curb Global Heat, U.N. to Turn Up Its Own

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/31nations.html
July 31, 2008
Trying to Curb Global Heat, U.N. to Turn Up Its Own
By NEIL MACFARQUHAR [UN] [general secretary Ban Ki-moon approave pilot program to move thermostats from current 72 up to 77] [symbolically important] [also, instead of just talking about problems, UN acting] [good PR] [******]
UNITED NATIONS — The United Nations has long been accused by its detractors of generating hot air. Starting in August, a glance at the thermostat in the Secretariat building will provide confirmation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/31nations.html
July 31, 2008
Trying to Curb Global Heat, U.N. to Turn Up Its Own
By NEIL MACFARQUHAR [UN] [general secretary Ban Ki-moon approave pilot program to move thermostats from current 72 up to 77] [symbolically important] [also, instead of just talking about problems, UN acting] [good PR] [******]
UNITED NATIONS — The United Nations has long been accused by its detractors of generating hot air. Starting in August, a glance at the thermostat in the Secretariat building will provide confirmation.
To set an example in the effort to curb energy use that contributes to global warming, the secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, has approved a one-month pilot project to raise the thermostat throughout much of the landmark building to 77 degrees from 72 degrees. [***]
The thermostats in the often windowless conference rooms, where much of the heavy haggling and some of the more impenetrable seminars unroll, will be set at 75 degrees, up from 70 degrees.
The building’s carbon dioxide emissions are expected to drop by an estimated 300 tons, and costs are expected to decrease by $100,000, according to Michael Adlerstein, who announced the experiment on Wednesday and who will oversee building renovations. [***]He said savings could reach $1 million annually if the United Nations mandated temperature changes year round.
Achieving a uniform temperature in the 39-story building, which was built in 1952, ranks up there with world peace as a noble, if unlikely, goal. Some rooms, notably the General Assembly and the basement, are frigid. Others feel distinctly tropical. [******]
Among other problems, the interior space of the building has been carved up so many times that thermostats no longer correspond precisely to the rooms they control, Mr. Adlerstein said. He said the determining factor in whether the United Nations decided to adjust its thermostats for the long term — including keeping the building colder during winter — was the effect on productivity. Naturally, diplomats had strongly diverging views on how they would be affected.
“If the rise in the temperature could cut back on the interminable negotiations running late into the evening for often disappointing results, then the outcome of the initiative would be a very good one,” said David Malone, a former Canadian ambassador.
One African envoy involved in countless heated negotiations recently said a compromise could prove more elusive at higher temperatures than it already is. (The diplomat and others interviewed found even the temperature a potentially sensitive topic and spoke anonymously.)
“When it is warm in the room, you are not fully attentive,” the envoy said, “And when you are not fully following, you will not be in the mood to compromise.”
To help speed the transition, “there is going to a be a relaxing of the dress protocols,” said Mr. Adlerstein, which in nondiplomatic terms means he jettisoned his coat and tie for the news conference. There are serious doubts that will fly.
“People walking around without jackets on are not taken seriously” said one man from an organization that promotes renewable energy. “You have to follow protocol.”
What if Mr. Ban sets the example by removing his own tie, as his office said he would?
“Then the protocol will change,” the man said.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

North Korea: U.N. Food Program Warns of Famine

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/asia/31brief03.html
July 31, 2008
World Briefing | Asia
North Korea: U.N. Food Program Warns of Famine
By KEITH BRADSHER [UN] [dire warnings of coming famine!] [last time I recall it so dire was 1990s] [DPRK] [idiot dear leader] [but keeps the military happy I suspect] [****] [use psci350] [****]
The United Nations World Food Program warned on Wednesday that successive poor harvests and flooding a year ago had resulted in millions of North Koreans facing hunger on a scale not seen in the North since a famine in the late 1990s. [**]The World Food Program plans to begin providing food to 6.4 million of the country's 23 million people by the end of this year. It is currently feeding 1.2 million North Koreans. The majority of families surveyed by the program's researchers have cut protein from their diets and are surviving on cereals and vegetables. One of the leading causes of malnutrition among children under 5 years old is diarrhea resulting from increased consumption of wild foods.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/asia/31brief03.html
July 31, 2008
World Briefing | Asia
North Korea: U.N. Food Program Warns of Famine
By KEITH BRADSHER [UN] [dire warnings of coming famine!] [last time I recall it so dire was 1990s] [DPRK] [idiot dear leader] [but keeps the military happy I suspect] [****] [use psci350] [****]
The United Nations World Food Program warned on Wednesday that successive poor harvests and flooding a year ago had resulted in millions of North Koreans facing hunger on a scale not seen in the North since a famine in the late 1990s. [**]The World Food Program plans to begin providing food to 6.4 million of the country's 23 million people by the end of this year. It is currently feeding 1.2 million North Koreans. The majority of families surveyed by the program's researchers have cut protein from their diets and are surviving on cereals and vegetables. One of the leading causes of malnutrition among children under 5 years old is diarrhea resulting from increased consumption of wild foods.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Strong Economy Propels Brazil to World Stage

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/americas/31brazil.html
July 31, 2008
Strong Economy Propels Brazil to World Stage
By ALEXEI BARRIONUEVO Brazil] [recently I heard interesting discussion by Dimitri Simes, et al.] [accordingly, politics in South America is not about right vs left] [it’s about two types of left: Lulu de Silva’s type that integrates into global economy and Chavez’s type that is nationalist-cum-chavinist?] [Bank of the South] [circumvent World Bank and other Bretton Woods institutions] [probably wise in some ways] [but Hugo Chavez is trying to make it symbol of his brand of socialism and anti-americanism] [even Brazil’s socialist leader, Lulu de Silva, is worried] [can integration work without markets?] [this suggests de Silva’s is more effective and winning] [may also be function of tough decisions made long before de Silva such as cutting petroleum dependency] [use ir text] [use psci350] [********]
FORTALEZA, Brazil — Desperate to escape her hand-to-mouth existence in one of Brazil’s poorest regions, Maria Benedita Sousa used a small loan five years ago to buy two sewing machines and start her own business making women’s underwear.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/americas/31brazil.html
July 31, 2008
Strong Economy Propels Brazil to World Stage
By ALEXEI BARRIONUEVO Brazil] [recently I heard interesting discussion by Dimitri Simes, et al.] [accordingly, politics in South America is not about right vs left] [it’s about two types of left: Lulu de Silva’s type that integrates into global economy and Chavez’s type that is nationalist-cum-chavinist?] [Bank of the South] [circumvent World Bank and other Bretton Woods institutions] [probably wise in some ways] [but Hugo Chavez is trying to make it symbol of his brand of socialism and anti-americanism] [even Brazil’s socialist leader, Lulu de Silva, is worried] [can integration work without markets?] [this suggests de Silva’s is more effective and winning] [may also be function of tough decisions made long before de Silva such as cutting petroleum dependency] [use ir text] [use psci350] [********]
FORTALEZA, Brazil — Desperate to escape her hand-to-mouth existence in one of Brazil’s poorest regions, Maria Benedita Sousa used a small loan five years ago to buy two sewing machines and start her own business making women’s underwear.
Today Ms. Sousa, a mother of three who started out working in a jeans factory making minimum wage, employs 25 people in a modest two-room factory that produces 55,000 pairs of cotton underwear a month. She bought and renovated a house for her family and is now thinking of buying a second car. Her daughter, who is studying to be a pharmacist, could be the first family member to finish college. [entrepenuer class encourage in de Silva’s leftism] [*******]
“You can’t imagine the happiness I am feeling,” Ms. Sousa, 43, said from the floor of her business, Big Mateus, named after a son. “I am someone who came from the countryside to the city. I battled and battled, and today my children are studying, with one in college and two others in school. It’s a gift from God.” [******]
Today her country is lifting itself up in much the same way. Brazil, South America’s largest economy, is finally poised to realize its long-anticipated potential as a global player, [***]economists say, as the country rides its biggest economic expansion in three decades.
That growth is being felt in nearly all parts of the economy, creating a new class of super rich even as people like Ms. Sousa lift themselves into an expanding middle class. [****]
It has also given Brazil new swagger, providing it, for instance, with greater leverage to push for a tougher bargain with the United States and Europe in global trade talks. [***] After seven years, those negotiations finally broke down this week over demands by India and China for safeguards for their farmers, a clear sign of the rising clout of these emerging economies. [******]
Despite investor fears about the leftist bent of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva when he was elected to lead Brazil in 2002, he has demonstrated a light touch when it comes to economic stewardship, avoiding the populist impulses of leaders in Venezuela and Bolivia. [namely, Hugo and Eva?] [*****]
Instead, he has fueled Brazil’s growth through a deft combination of respect for financial markets and targeted social programs, which are lifting millions out of poverty, [***]said David Fleischer, a political analyst and emeritus professor at the University of Brasília. Ms. Sousa is one such beneficiary.
Long famous for its unequal distribution of wealth, Brazil has shrunk its income gap by six percentage points since 2001, more than any other country in South America this decade, [****]said Francisco Ferreira, a lead economist at the World Bank.
While the top 10 percent of Brazil’s earners saw their cumulative income rise by 7 percent from 2001 to 2006, the bottom 10 percent shot up by 58 percent, [wow] [spectacular] [******]according to Marcelo Côrtes Neri, the director of the Center for Social Policies at the Getulio Vargas Foundation in Rio de Janeiro.
But Brazil is also outspending most of its neighbors on social programs, and overall public spending continues to be nearly four times as high as what Mexico spends as a percentage of its gross national product, [must watch that] [*****]Mr. Ferreira said.
The momentum of its economic expansion is expected to last. As the United States and parts of Europe struggle with recession and the fallout from housing crises, Brazil’s economy shows few of the vulnerabilities of other emerging powers.
It has greatly diversified its industrial base, has huge potential to expand a booming agricultural sector into virgin fields and holds a tremendous pool of untapped natural resources. [*****]New oil discoveries will thrust Brazil into the ranks of the global oil powers within the next decade. [****]
Yet while exports of commodities like oil and agricultural goods have driven much of its recent growth, Brazil is less and less dependent on them, economists say, having the advantage of a huge domestic market — 185 million people — that has grown wealthier with the success of people like Ms. Sousa. [******]
In fact, with a stronger currency and inflation mostly in check, Brazilians are on a spending spree that has become a prime motor for the economy, which grew 5.4 percent last year. [*******]
They are buying both Brazilian goods and a rising flood of imported products. Many businesses have relaxed credit terms to allow Brazilians to pay for refrigerators, cars and even plastic surgery over years instead of months, despite some of the highest interest rates in the world. In June the country reached 100 million credit cards issued, a 17 percent jump over last year. [*******] [CIA World Factbook cites about 192 million population so pretty pervasive] [*****]
At Casas Bahia, a modestly priced Brazilian furniture-store chain, the number of customers buying items on installment nearly tripled to 29.3 million from 2002 to 2007, said Sônia Mitaini, a company spokeswoman.
Other signs of new wealth abound. In Macaé, an oil boomtown near Rio de Janeiro, contractors are racing to finish new shopping malls and luxury housing to keep up with demand from oil-service firms. At a port in Angra dos Reis, a town known for its spectacular islands, some 25,000 workers have found jobs building oil platforms.
Petrobras, Brazil’s national oil company, shocked the oil world in November when it announced that its Tupi deepwater field offshore of Rio de Janeiro could hold five billion to eight billion barrels of oil. [****]Analysts think there could be billions of barrels more in surrounding areas.
While the oil will be expensive and complicated to extract, Petrobras has said it expects to be producing up to 100,000 barrels a day from Tupi by 2010, and hopes to produce up to a million barrels a day in about a decade. [******]
The new oil plays are setting off an investment boom in Rio de Janeiro, with an estimated $67.6 billion expected to flow into the state by 2010, according to the Rio de Janeiro State Federation of Industries, an industry group. Petrobras alone expects to invest $40.5 billion by 2012.
Some economists say a slowdown in the rest of the world’s economy, especially in Asia, which is soaking up much of Brazil’s exports of soybeans and iron ore, could crimp growth here. [****] “But that probability is small,” said Alfredo Coutiño, the senior economist for Latin America for Moody’s Economy.com.
In fact, because Brazil’s economy has become so diversified in recent years, the country is less susceptible to a hangover from the struggling United States economy. [one reason is tough decision in 1970s to sever dependency on middle east oil] [****]
Brazil’s exports to the United States represent just 2.5 percent of Brazil’s gross national product, compared with 25 percent of G.N.P. for Mexican exports, according to Moody’s.
“What makes Brazil more resilient is that the rest of the world matters less,” said Don Hanna, the head of emerging market economics at Citibank.
The rest of the world certainly has helped. Soaring prices for minerals and other commodities have created a new class of super rich. The number of Brazilians with liquid fortunes exceeding $1 million grew by 19 percent last year, third behind China and India, [****]according to a survey by Merrill Lynch and Capgemini.
At the same time, President da Silva has deepened many of the social programs begun 10 years ago under Fernando Henrique Cardoso, who as president ushered in many of the structural reforms that laid the foundations of Brazil’s stable growth today. [***]
In Ms. Sousa’s case, for instance, she owes much of the success of her underwear business to loans she has received from the Bank of the Northeast, a government-financed bank that has awarded microloans to 330,000 people to develop businesses [***]in this fast-growing region.
Other programs, like Bolsa Familia, give small subsidies to millions of poor Brazilians to buy food and other essentials. Bolsa Familia, which benefits 45 million people nationwide in distributing an annual budget of about $5.6 billion, has been far more effective at raising per-capita incomes than recent increases in the minimum wage, which has risen 36 percent since 2003. [********]
The bottom-up nature of such social programs has helped expand formal and informal employment as well as the Brazilian middle class. The number of people under the poverty line — defined as those earning less than $80 a month — fell by 32 percent from 2004 to 2006, [***]Mr. Neri said.
The programs have been particularly effective here in Brazil’s northeast, historically one of poorest parts of the country. Residents here have received more than half the $15.6 billion doled out in social programs from 2003 to 2006, according to Empresa de Pesquisa Energetica, an arm of the Energy Ministry.
People here are using that new wealth to buy items like televisions and refrigerators at a faster rate than the rest of the country. The northeast, in fact, passed the country’s south in electricity use this year for the first time, the energy agency said.
Many families have bridged the gap to the middle class by using Bolsa Familia to meet basic needs, and then applying for small loans to start businesses and escape the informal economy. That is what Maria Auxiliadora Sampaio and her husband did in Fortaleza, a coastal city of 2.4 million people. They were receiving Bolsa Familia payments of about $30 a month, which they used to support their three children. Then, two years ago, Ms. Sampaio used a microloan of about $190 to buy nail polish and kick-start her manicure business, which she runs from home.
Today she is making around $70 a day — about four minimum salaries per month, she said. With her next loan she plans to put about $140 toward a stove to sterilize nail clippers, which today she does with hot water.
The fruits of her new business have allowed the couple to retile their house and buy a television and a cellphone. This month her husband, who works at a Cachaça factory, was able to realize a dream: to buy a drum set.
He plans to use it in a band that plays forró, a traditional music in the northeast. “We always ate and paid bills, but he waited and waited,” and finally bought the set for about $780, she said.
“I feel like we are part of this group of people that are coming up in the world,” said Ms. Sampaio, 28. “When you don’t have anything, when you don’t have a profession, don’t have the means to live, you are no one, you are a mosquito. I was nothing. Today, I am in heaven.”
Mery Galanternick contributed reporting from Rio de Janeiro.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

China to Limit Web Access During Olympic Games

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/sports/olympics/31china.html
July 31, 2008
China to Limit Web Access During Olympic Games
By ANDREW JACOBS [China] [PRC] [with China’s rise as great power, manifold problems?] [China’s done business in Africa almost purely on China’s economic and power interests] [buys energy and sells armaments to nearly any regime including Zimbabwe, Sudan & pariah states] [here: china is furiously readying itself for 8-8-08 and breaking lots of china—no pun intended—doing so] [use psci350] [use ir text] [***]
BEIJING — The International Olympic Committee failed to press China to allow fully unfettered access to the Internet for the thousands of journalists arriving here to cover the Olympics, despite promising repeatedly that the foreign news media could “report freely” during the Games, Olympic officials acknowledged Wednesday.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/sports/olympics/31china.html
July 31, 2008
China to Limit Web Access During Olympic Games
By ANDREW JACOBS [China] [PRC] [with China’s rise as great power, manifold problems?] [China’s done business in Africa almost purely on China’s economic and power interests] [buys energy and sells armaments to nearly any regime including Zimbabwe, Sudan & pariah states] [here: china is furiously readying itself for 8-8-08 and breaking lots of china—no pun intended—doing so] [use psci350] [use ir text] [***]
BEIJING — The International Olympic Committee failed to press China to allow fully unfettered access to the Internet for the thousands of journalists arriving here to cover the Olympics, despite promising repeatedly that the foreign news media could “report freely” during the Games, Olympic officials acknowledged Wednesday.
Since the Olympic Village press center opened Friday, reporters have been unable to access scores of Web pages — among them those that discuss Tibetan issues, Taiwanese independence, the violent crackdown on the protests in Tiananmen Square and the Web sites of Amnesty International, the BBC’s Chinese-language news, Radio Free Asia and several Hong Kong newspapers known for their freewheeling political discourse.
The restrictions, which closely resemble the blocks that China places on the Internet for its citizens, undermine sweeping claims by Jacques Rogge, the International Olympic Committee president, that China had agreed to provide full Web access for foreign news media during the Games. Mr. Rogge has long argued that one of the main benefits of awarding the Games to Beijing was that the event would make China more open.
“For the first time, foreign media will be able to report freely and publish their work freely in China. There will be no censorship on the Internet,” Mr. Rogge told Agence France-Presse just two weeks ago.
But a high-ranking Olympic committee official said Wednesday that the panel was aware that China would continue to censor Web sites carrying content that the Chinese propaganda authorities deemed harmful to national security and social stability. The panel acquiesced to China’s demands to maintain such controls, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not the designated public spokesman for the International Olympic Committee.
It was not immediately clear if China had provided special Internet links for overseas journalists working at the press center in the Olympic Village. But Chinese officials, speaking about the Internet restrictions on Wednesday, said they would not allow foreign journalists to visit Web sites that violated Chinese laws.
In its negotiations with the Chinese over Internet controls, the Olympic committee official said, the panel insisted only that China provide unregulated access to sites containing information useful to sports reporters covering athletic competitions, not to a broader array of sites that the Chinese and the Olympic committee negotiators determined had little relevance to sports.
The official said he now believed that the Chinese defined their national security needs more broadly than the Olympic committee had anticipated, denying reporters access to some information they might need to cover the events and the host country fully. This week, foreign news media in China were unable to gain direct access to an Amnesty International report detailing what it called a deterioration in China’s human rights record in the prelude to the Games.
“We are quite stunned by the decision, but we will survive this mess,” the official said. Sandrine Tonge, the media relations coordinator for the committee, said it would press the Chinese authorities to reconsider.
Chinese officials initially suggested that any troubles journalists were having with Internet access probably stemmed from the sites themselves, not any steps that China had taken to filter Web content. But Sun Weide, the chief spokesman for the Beijing Olympic organizing committee, acknowledged Wednesday that journalists would not have uncensored Internet use. “It has been our policy to provide the media with convenient and sufficient access to the Internet,” Mr. Sun said. “I believe our policy will not affect reporters’ coverage of the Olympic Games.”
Mr. Sun said foreigners using the Internet in China would be subject to the same laws under which censors blocked access to a wide range of Web sites thought to be detrimental to stability. China has long maintained that its laws governing Internet access do not amount to censorship and are similar to restrictions on pornography or gambling sites in many countries.
The restrictions were the latest in a string of problems that have tarnished the prelude to the Olympics, which open Aug. 8. China struggled to contain ethnic unrest in Tibetan areas this spring. The global torch relay that China organized to promote the Games was disrupted by protests. Air pollution in Beijing has remained severe despite efforts to reduce it.
In recent months, human rights advocates have accused Beijing of stepping up the detention and surveillance of those it fears could disrupt the Games. On Tuesday, President Bush met with five Chinese dissidents at the White House to drive home his dissatisfaction with the pace of change. Mr. Bush, who will attend the opening ceremonies in just over a week, also pressed China’s foreign minister to ease political repression.
The White House also urged China to lift its restrictions on the Internet. “We want to see more access for reporters, we want to see more access for everybody in China to be able to have access to the Internet,” the White House press secretary, Dana Perino, said Wednesday.
On Capitol Hill, Senator Sam Brownback, Republican of Kansas, introduced a resolution on Tuesday urging China to reconsider what he said were its plans to force international hotel chains to track electronic communications by its guests. At a news conference, he introduced redacted documents that he said were provided by the hotels requiring them to install government software to monitor Internet traffic during the Olympics.
Concerns about media access to the Internet intensified Tuesday, when Western journalists working at the Main Press Center in Beijing said they could not get to Amnesty International’s Web site to see the group’s report on China’s rights record.
T. Kumar, Amnesty International’s Asia advocacy director, said he thought the government hoped it could dissuade reporters from pursuing stories about human rights issues by blocking their access to Internet-based information. “This sends the wrong message not only to journalists but to anyone on his or her way to the Olympics,” he said.
It was not clear how hard Olympic committee officials pushed for open access to the Internet during negotiations with the Chinese, which dated from to the decision to award Beijing the Games in 2001, or why Mr. Rogge, the Olympic chief, promised that the news media would have uncensored access during the Games when officials working for him were aware that China would keep at least some of its censorship policies in place. [incompetence] [******]
Kevan Gosper, press chief of the International Olympic Committee, was quoted by Reuters on Wednesday as saying that I.O.C. officials had agreed that China could block sites that would not hinder reporting on the Games themselves. “I also now understand that some I.O.C. official negotiated with the Chinese that some sensitive sites would be blocked on the basis they were not considered Games-related,” he told Reuters.
The senior Olympic committee official said the committee pressed hardest for unfiltered access to sites that sports reporters would need to cover athletic competitions. He said such sites included some that had been blocked in China in the past, including Wikipedia, but did not include political sites run by groups that the Beijing government considers hostile, like the spiritual sect Falun Gong. [*****]
Jonathan Watts, president of the Foreign Correspondents Club of China, said he was disappointed that Beijing had failed to honor its agreement to temporarily remove the firewall that prevented Chinese citizens from fully using the Internet. [*****]
“Obviously if reporters can’t access all the sites they want to see, they can’t do their jobs,” he said. “Unfortunately such restrictions are normal for reporters in China, but the Olympics were supposed to be different.”
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

China Angered by Lobbying on Rights

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/sports/olympics/01dissidents.html
August 1, 2008
China Angered by Lobbying on Rights
By ANDREW JACOBS [China] [PRC] [with China’s rise as great power, manifold problems?] [China’s done business in Africa almost purely on China’s economic and power interests] [buys energy and sells armaments to nearly any regime including Zimbabwe, Sudan & pariah states] [here: china is furiously readying itself for 8-8-08 and breaking lots of china—no pun intended—doing so] [use psci350] [use ir text] [***]
BEIJING — In response to President Bush’s meeting with prominent Chinese dissidents at the White House, Beijing on Thursday sharply condemned Washington for interfering in China’s domestic affairs and accused American legislators of politicizing the Olympics. [*****]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/sports/olympics/01dissidents.html
August 1, 2008
China Angered by Lobbying on Rights
By ANDREW JACOBS [China] [PRC] [with China’s rise as great power, manifold problems?] [China’s done business in Africa almost purely on China’s economic and power interests] [buys energy and sells armaments to nearly any regime including Zimbabwe, Sudan & pariah states] [here: china is furiously readying itself for 8-8-08 and breaking lots of china—no pun intended—doing so] [use psci350] [use ir text] [***]
BEIJING — In response to President Bush’s meeting with prominent Chinese dissidents at the White House, Beijing on Thursday sharply condemned Washington for interfering in China’s domestic affairs and accused American legislators of politicizing the Olympics. [*****]
Shortly after Mr. Bush held talks Tuesday with the five dissidents — Harry Wu, Wei Jingsheng, Rebiya Kadeer, Sasha Gong and Bob Fu — the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution urging China to honor its pledge to improve human rights before the Games, [****]which begin Aug. 8. The resolution passed 419 to 1.
During a news conference Thursday, Liu Jianchao, a Foreign Ministry spokesman, described the House measure as “odious conduct” and said the United States should stop “making use of so-called religious and human rights” issues to score political points, Agence France-Presse reported.
The Chinese authorities also remained resolute about their decision to maintain a firewall on the Internet and limit access for journalists covering the Olympics. Senior officials with the International Olympic Committee, or IOC, have said they were stunned to learn Wednesday that Beijing’s longstanding pledge to provide foreign reporters with unfettered access would not be honored. [if they were stunned, they were exceptionally naïve] [*******]
Kevan Gosper, a former Olympic athlete from Australia and the chief of the IOC press commission in Beijing, said he had been assured that visiting journalists would have no limitations on their Internet use during the Games. But he said Wednesday that other IOC officials, whom he did not identify, had agreed to let some Web sites be blocked. Olympic organizers say they are trying to convince the government to reconsider its decision to limit access. [incredible incompetence by IOC] [*****]
In an interview Thursday, Sun Weide, a spokesman for the Beijing Olympic organizing committee, said reporters arriving in China in the coming week should not expect access to sites that discuss topics such as Tibet, Taiwanese independence or the Falun Gong, a banned religious group that China has deemed an “evil cult.” Such sites, he said, “contain information that is in breach of Chinese law.”
He also stressed that the number of banned sites were few — although he declined to provide a precise number — and he insisted that reporters would have no limitations in covering athletic events. [****]Mr. Sun said the authorities would not monitor the personal e-mails of reporters at the Olympics’ main press center. “We always have been following international law on such matters,” he said.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Karadzic to Appear in Court

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/world/europe/01hague.html
August 1, 2008
Karadzic to Appear in Court
By MARLISE SIMONS [the Hague] [Netherlands] [while in Europe Karadzic was captured] [it played daily on BBC] [not in my coverage due to internet problems—though if I ever get backlog posted, it’s there] [Serbia] [Kosovo] [former Yugoslavia] [stalemate between Serb minority within Kosovo and its benefactors in Serbia versus Kosovar-Albanian majority] [UN int’l community have been relatively ineffective] [followup] [serb ethos] [********]
THE HAGUE — Radovan Karadzic, the former Bosnian Serb leader who was transferred early Wednesday from Serbia to a jail cell near here, will appear in public court on Thursday for the first time to answer charges of genocide and war crimes. [****]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/world/europe/01hague.html
August 1, 2008
Karadzic to Appear in Court
By MARLISE SIMONS [the Hague] [Netherlands] [while in Europe Karadzic was captured] [it played daily on BBC] [not in my coverage due to internet problems—though if I ever get backlog posted, it’s there] [Serbia] [Kosovo] [former Yugoslavia] [stalemate between Serb minority within Kosovo and its benefactors in Serbia versus Kosovar-Albanian majority] [UN int’l community have been relatively ineffective] [followup] [serb ethos] [********]
THE HAGUE — Radovan Karadzic, the former Bosnian Serb leader who was transferred early Wednesday from Serbia to a jail cell near here, will appear in public court on Thursday for the first time to answer charges of genocide and war crimes. [****]
Open to spectators and recorded by an official court camera, the hearing will begin legal proceedings against him, as well as offer a first public glimpse of the man who evaded capture for 13 years, most recently hiding behind a bushy beard and white hair as a practitioner of alternative medicine.
Mr. Karadzic, reportedly shorn of his disguise, has said through a lawyer that he intends to represent himself in the international tribunal here. On Thursday, Blic, a Serbian newspaper, published photographs of what appeared to be the first pictures of Mr. Karadzic since his arrest, [****]showing him clean shaven and with his white hair cut short and combed back neatly.
The hearing may also indicate how seriously he intends to take the court. A hint came Wednesday. After Mr. Karadzic’s arrest on a bus last week in Belgrade, his brother told reporters repeatedly that lawyers were challenging the legality of his transfer to The Hague and had filed an appeal. But on Wednesday one of the lawyers admitted that no such step had ever been taken. [**************] [?]
Goran Petronijevic, a member of the Karadzic legal team, told reporters in Belgrade, Serbia’s capital, that the account of an appeal being mailed from somewhere in Serbia had been a ruse to stall the extradition and to buy time for Mr. Karadzic’s family to visit him in jail. [***]The family did not see him, but it will be allowed to visit him in the tribunal jail.
With no appeal in hand, Serbian officials whisked Mr. Karadzic through Belgrade on Wednesday, hours after thousands of nationalists protested downtown against his transfer to The Hague, and he was flown to Rotterdam.
He was then taken by a Dutch police helicopter inside the walls of the men’s penitentiary in nearby Scheveningen. Within this compound, invisible from the road, the United Nations leases a modern independent cellblock, where about 40 inmates are held while facing charges of committing war crimes during the Balkan wars of the 1990s. [****]
On his first day here, Mr. Karadzic was informed of his rights and examined by a doctor, according to a court official. At first, he will be kept separate from the other prisoners, among them Serbs, Croats and Bosnian Muslims, his former allies and foes, [***] the official said.
In this jail, which holds people from three sides of violent political conflicts, newcomers are often isolated at the beginning to let them integrate slowly. Some are kept on separate floors to prevent them from colluding on evidence. [***] Eventually Mr. Karadzic and others will be allowed to exercise together, play games and cook if they do not want jail food, lawyers familiar with jail procedures said.
Mr. Karadzic’s trial is not expected to start for several months, the tribunal’s chief prosecutor, Serge Brammertz, said Wednesday.
If Mr. Karadzic is found guilty of the charges in his indictment, which include crimes against humanity and genocide, he may face a life sentence. This tribunal has no death penalty. But he will not serve his sentence in the cellblock run by the United Nations as a temporary detention center. Other countries have set aside prison space for tribunal convicts. [*****]
For now, Mr. Karadzic will reside somewhere close to the cell where his former close ally, Slobodan Milosevic, the former Serbian president, spent close to five years. Mr. Milosevic died here in 2006, [*****] before the end of his trial. While acting as his own lawyer, Mr. Milosevic was given an additional cell to keep his court documents.
Mr. Karadzic may be given the same amenities if judges permit him to represent himself,
He will also be able to receive visitors in public spaces that are monitored. Lawyers, close relatives, children and other select visitors can call at the jail every day from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Inmates can also reserve private space in one of three conjugal bedrooms. There are other perks, including newspapers in Serbo-Croatian, public pay phones in the halls and access to computers, which are not connected to the Internet. Because of the range of amenities, some Serbian news organizations have nicknamed the jail the Hague Hilton. [*****]
Mr. Karadzic, indicted in 1995, arrives at the busiest period in the history of the special tribunal for war crimes in the former Yugoslavia. Eight trials are under way, involving 27 defendants. Mr. Karadzic’s presence here is now widely expected to prolong the life of the tribunal, which was scheduled to close in 2010. [*********]
That decision is up to the United Nations Security Council, which created the court in 1993, during the violent breakup of the former Yugoslavia.
The name of Mr. Karadzic, like that of Gen. Ratko Mladic, his military commander, who is still a fugitive, has long haunted the court and its successive prosecutors, who kept the fugitives’ pictures on a wanted poster in their office. [***] For Carla Del Ponte, who stepped down as prosecutor in December, the campaign for their capture was almost the main theme of her eight-year tenure.
During an interview before her departure in December, she said she had counted on getting custody of General Mladic because he was widely known to be in Serbia. She said there had been many rumors, but few believable traces of Mr. Karadzic. In her memoirs, published in Italy this year, she wrote that the West had lost a number of chances to arrest him and said that she been naïve in believing assurances to her by the Central Intelligence Agency that his capture was a top priority. [******]
Marlise Simons reported from The Hague. Dan Bilefsky contributed reporting from Belgrade, Serbia, and Graham Bowley from New York..
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Russians Pull Out of Georgian Area

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/europe/31russia.html
July 31, 2008
Russians Pull Out of Georgian Area
By REUTERS [Russia] [former USSR] [rebirth of Russia’s inferiority complex that leads to Russia’s leaders striking in odd ways] [followup] [Czar Putin’s role just changed from leader on stage to leader behind curtain?] [now Medvedev assumes mother Russia’s rising role] [Czar Putin’s man in Moscow] [on the future of US-Russia relations] [unless a ruse or feign, first positive news in some time] [use psci 350] [use ir text] [*******]
SUKHUMI, Georgia (Reuters) — The last of 400 Russian soldiers sent to repair a railroad in Georgia’s rebel region of Abkhazia began to leave on Wednesday, ending a deployment that had angered Georgia and its Western allies. [******]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/europe/31russia.html
July 31, 2008
Russians Pull Out of Georgian Area
By REUTERS [Russia] [former USSR] [rebirth of Russia’s inferiority complex that leads to Russia’s leaders striking in odd ways] [followup] [Czar Putin’s role just changed from leader on stage to leader behind curtain?] [now Medvedev assumes mother Russia’s rising role] [Czar Putin’s man in Moscow] [on the future of US-Russia relations] [unless a ruse or feign, first positive news in some time] [use psci 350] [use ir text] [*******]
SUKHUMI, Georgia (Reuters) — The last of 400 Russian soldiers sent to repair a railroad in Georgia’s rebel region of Abkhazia began to leave on Wednesday, ending a deployment that had angered Georgia and its Western allies. [******]
“It’s certain that all the personnel and all the equipment will be sent away from here,” the Russian commander, Lt. Gen. Sergei Klimets, said after he had handed out medals to the soldiers.
Abkhazia is a lush, mountainous stretch of land that hugs the Black Sea. Rebels fought Georgia after the collapse of the Soviet Union in a three-year war that ended in a cease-fire. [***********]
Georgia has accused Russia, which has about 3,000 soldiers in the region acting as peacekeepers, of trying to annex Abkhazia, but Russia said the deployment of the unarmed railroad soldiers was to provide humanitarian aid. [******]
Russia and the United States are competing for influence in the Caucasus, which the West sees as a vital route for exporting oil from the Caspian Sea. [not just the West!] [everyone sees it as vital] [******]
The railroad line links Abkhazia’s capital, Sukhumi, to the town of Ochamchira, to the south.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Olmert to Quit After Elections in September

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/middleeast/31mideast.html
July 31, 2008
Olmert to Quit After Elections in September
By ISABEL KERSHNER Israeli] [domestic politics intersects with Israeli foreign policy] [bush administration “road map”] [sec state Rice still has neck out on Israeli-Palestinian conflict] [doubtful given administration’s diminution of power in waning months] [Olmert has finally been forced to remove himself from leading Kadima for Sept elections] [****]
JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, embroiled in a high-profile corruption investigation, announced on Wednesday that he would resign after his party chose a new leader in September elections. [******]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/middleeast/31mideast.html
July 31, 2008
Olmert to Quit After Elections in September
By ISABEL KERSHNER Israeli] [domestic politics intersects with Israeli foreign policy] [bush administration “road map”] [sec state Rice still has neck out on Israeli-Palestinian conflict] [doubtful given administration’s diminution of power in waning months] [Olmert has finally been forced to remove himself from leading Kadima for Sept elections] [****]
JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, embroiled in a high-profile corruption investigation, announced on Wednesday that he would resign after his party chose a new leader in September elections. [******]
The televised announcement injected new uncertainty into Israeli politics and the Middle East peace effort, coming just as Mr. Olmert has been intensifying negotiations with the Palestinian Authority as well as Syria. [****] [may have been why he was able to maneuver thusly] [*****]
It also raises questions about the political legacies of both President Bush and Mr. Olmert, who have hoped to burnish their reputations by achieving breakthroughs in Middle East peace talks before leaving office.
Mr. Olmert’s domestic credibility has sunk so low that it is unclear whether he still has the legitimacy or the political traction to make historic concessions to Arab adversaries at all. [*****]
His political weakness may also undermine his ability to work in partnership with the Americans in pursuit of Middle East peace.
The prime minister, speaking live on Wednesday on Israeli television, passionately reiterated his commitment to peace but acknowledged that the corruption allegations made it impossible for him to continue in his office. [*******]
“The current slander campaign,” Mr. Olmert said, “including by people who truthfully believe in the virtue of the state and its image, raises a question I cannot and will not ignore: What is more important? Is it my own personal justice, or the public good?”
Many commentators described his speech as statesmanlike, allowing him to leave office with a modicum of dignity and the air of a man who — belatedly in the eyes of his many critics — had finally done the right thing. [******]
Previously, Mr. Olmert had pledged to resign only if charged. On Wednesday, he vowed that he would continue to fight the legal battle and prove his “innocence and clean hands.”
Mr. Olmert is suspected by the authorities of crimes including bribery, fraud and breach of trust, but he has not been charged with anything so far. He admitted to having made “mistakes” before he became prime minister in 2006. In one high-profile case, Mr. Olmert is suspected of having received tens of thousands of dollars in cash from Morris Talansky, [******]a Long Island fund-raiser and financier, over a period of 13 years.
In the latest case, known here as “Olmert Tours,” the prime minister is suspected of having billed multiple state and charitable agencies for the same flights when he was mayor of Jerusalem and a government minister, using the extra money for private family trips. [****] The police and the Justice Ministry publicized details of that investigation on July 11.
Several other investigations against him have been pending for months. It is unclear when they will be resolved.
At once composed and defiant, Mr. Olmert devoted the first part of his almost 10-minute speech to extolling his government’s achievements on issues like security and poverty. But some of his most emotional statements were about his commitment to peace.
“I continue to believe wholeheartedly that reaching peace, ending terrorism, strengthening security and establishing a different relationship with our neighbors are the most vital goals for the future of the state of Israel,” he said, adding that American support and the leadership of Mr. Bush had “greatly contributed” to the effort.
A White House spokesman, Gordon D. Johndroe, said that Mr. Olmert and Mr. Bush spoke just before the announcement. Mr. Bush “wishes him well and will continue to work closely with him while he remains prime minister,” Mr. Johndroe said. He went on to describe relations with Israel during Mr. Olmert’s tenure as “exceptionally close and cooperative” and expressed confidence that the relationship would continue.
A spokesman for the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, who has staked his own reputation on the peace effort, described Mr. Olmert’s resignation plans on Wednesday as an “internal affair.” The spokesman, Nabil Abu Rudeineh, said, “The Palestinian Authority deals with the prime minister of Israel, regardless if he is Olmert or somebody else.” [********]
Mr. Olmert said that Israel was “closer than ever” to reaching understandings that might serve as a basis for agreements with the Syrians and the Palestinians, [****]adding that he would work until his last day in office to bring the negotiations to a successful conclusion “that bears hope.”
So far, however, six months of talks with the Palestinians have not yielded any obvious results, while Syria continues to insist on talking to Israel indirectly through Turkish mediators. [*********]
Mr. Olmert’s drive for diplomatic achievements “might frighten some,” said Abraham Diskin, a political scientist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. There are Israelis who do not believe in agreements, [****] [with whom a sliver of American Jews, prominently the neoconservatives (Vulcans) agree] and others who support the peace effort but do not feel comfortable having their leader negotiate desperately with an eye on the clock. [whith whom most American Jews agree ] [and with whom many American Christians, Evangelicals, Buddhists, Greek Orthodox, aetheists, and so on agree] [****]“I belong to that second category,” Mr. Diskin said.
The future of the talks will depend largely on who emerges as Israel’s next leader.
The leadership race in the governing Kadima Party has been set for Sept. 17, with a runoff, if necessary, on Sept. 24. The main contenders are Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, who leads the Israeli team in talks with the Palestinians, and Shaul Mofaz, the more hawkish transportation minister who is a former defense minister and a former army chief of staff. [not dissimilar to the US, it is often the hawkish one who is best able to maneuver] [thus, while I have been offended by Shaul Mofaz more frequently than Livini, he’s probably the best candidate for American interests] [I put American interests first, unapologetically] [*******]
In recent polls, Ms. Livni was leading, but Mr. Mofaz was closing the gap.
Mr. Olmert had left open the possibility of competing himself until Wednesday, though few expected that he would.
Although Mr. Olmert has pledged to resign after the vote, he will remain as a transitional prime minister until his successor can form a new government able to garner a majority of 61 votes in the 120-seat Parliament. That government would try to survive until a general election scheduled for 2010.
If the new Kadima leader fails to form a government, Israel will hold an early election, probably in early 2009, giving Mr. Olmert a few extra months in office.
Mr. Olmert’s rivals within his own party and his partners in the governing coalition have not been eager for early elections. Opinion polls have indicated that the victor would be Benjamin Netanyahu, [****]leader of the rightist Likud Party. [I’m far from a Likud booster and often find Bebe downright offensive and brutish but again it’s often the hawks who ultimately reach the deals!] [*******]
Nevertheless, under fierce pressure from Olmert critics, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, the leader of the Labor Party, a main coalition partner, urged Mr. Olmert to step aside in May pending the outcome of the police investigations, then forced the prime minister to agree to a party primary instead. [when Barak was PM, a peace deal was within a hare’s breadth] [the Wye River Plantation deal?] [******]
The September leadership vote will be a first for Kadima, which was formed in 2005 by Ariel Sharon, the prime minister at the time. Mr. Olmert became acting prime minister when Mr. Sharon had a stroke in January 2006 and prime minister when Kadima won an election in March 2006.
His term in office has been plagued by problems. In June 2006, an Israeli soldier was captured by Hamas and other Palestinian militant groups and taken to Gaza. Israel is still trying to negotiate his release.
In July 2006 two more soldiers were captured on Israel’s northern border, setting off a war with the Lebanese militia Hezbollah. Mr. Olmert was excoriated in an April 2007 preliminary report on government and military failings in conducting the war but adamantly refused to resign. [******]
In October 2007, Mr. Olmert announced that he had early-stage prostate cancer that his doctors said could be treated and cured.
In the end, though, it was the testimony of Mr. Talansky from Long Island that brought the prime minister down.
Helene Cooper contributed reporting from Washington, and Neil MacFarquhar from the United Nations.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Deal on a Security Agreement Is Close, Iraqis Say

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/middleeast/31iraq.html
July 31, 2008
Deal on a Security Agreement Is Close, Iraqis Say
By ALISSA J. RUBIN and STEVEN LEE MYERS [-ir] [hydra] [insurgency] [bush administration’s “surge option”] [some positive indicators of improvement] [nevertheless, violence while surge unfolds] [clearly, sectarian] [followup] [“surge” continues amid mixed indicators] [al Maliki govt attempting to re-assure Iran about proposed SoFA with US while committing not to allow –iraq to be used as launch pad] [the spike in violence that began this past spring continues] [tough negotiations over SOFA] [***]
BAGHDAD — Iraq and the United States are close to a deal on a sensitive security agreement that Iraqi officials said on Wednesday satisfies the nation’s desire to be treated as sovereign and independent. [*********]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/middleeast/31iraq.html
July 31, 2008
Deal on a Security Agreement Is Close, Iraqis Say
By ALISSA J. RUBIN and STEVEN LEE MYERS [-ir] [hydra] [insurgency] [bush administration’s “surge option”] [some positive indicators of improvement] [nevertheless, violence while surge unfolds] [clearly, sectarian] [followup] [“surge” continues amid mixed indicators] [al Maliki govt attempting to re-assure Iran about proposed SoFA with US while committing not to allow –iraq to be used as launch pad] [the spike in violence that began this past spring continues] [tough negotiations over SOFA] [***]
BAGHDAD — Iraq and the United States are close to a deal on a sensitive security agreement that Iraqi officials said on Wednesday satisfies the nation’s desire to be treated as sovereign and independent. [*********]
The agreement, under intense scrutiny in both countries, sets the terms for the presence of American troops in Iraq. Negotiations had stalled a month ago largely over the Bush administration’s refusal to specify an intention to withdraw troops. While the current version does not specify any exact date, officials said, President Bush’s recent acknowledgment that withdrawal was an “aspirational goal” has revived the talks and pushed them closer to completion. [********]
The emerging agreement, officials said, gives Iraqis much of what they want — most notably the guarantee that there would no longer be foreign troops visible on their land — and leaves room for them to discreetly ask for an extended American presence should security deteriorate. [************]
“The intention is to maintain full sovereignty for Iraq with close observation of the security situation, which will determine exactly when Iraq will no longer need American forces,” said Jalaluddin al-Sagheer, a member of Parliament from the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq who is close to the negotiations.
Although security nationwide has improved far more rapidly than expected in the last several months, it could erode quickly, a point that was underscored earlier this week in Kirkuk when a suicide bomber killed 24 people and set off accusations from different ethnic groups that quickly spiraled into a riot. [***********]
“The negotiations had gotten to the point that a draft was being circulated,” said an American official in Washington who is familiar with the negotiations.
The Americans have been pushing hard for an agreement to be reached in the next two days, said Haider al-Abbadi, a Parliament member close to Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, but he said that the Iraqis were not ready and that he was not sure they would be able to come to an agreement by then.
The Bush administration’s unofficial deadline for the deal has long been July 31. [***] Although the United Nations mandate allowing American troops to operate in Iraq will not expire until the end of the year, politicians in both countries have been concerned that with elections approaching in the United States and Iraq, it might not be possible to reach an agreement once the fall campaign is in full swing and it would be better to finish negotiations during the summer.
Also, the White House announced late on Wednesday that President Bush would make a statement on Iraq on Thursday morning. [*****]
It was not clear whether the draft would even include a tentative timetable for troop withdrawal. The American official said that the draft did not include a date of the so-called time horizon. [**********]
Officials said that they were discussing the goal of having all American troops, including advisers and trainers, leave by 2010, but that the time of departure would depend on conditions on the ground.
The authorization for the presence of American troops would be renewable annually so that if conditions worsened or improved, Iraqis could respond [****]to that, according to Ayaed al-Sammaraie, a Sunni leader, and several other Iraqis knowledgeable about the agreement.
The agreement is divided into three parts, [****]said Fouad Massoun, a Kurdish member of Parliament close to the negotiations, as well as several other Iraqis. The first section is an uncontroversial “strategic framework agreement,” which generally lays out the future relationship between the United States and Iraq. [*] [********]
The second section is a “protocol” that includes the rules governing American troops. It would authorize the continued presence of American troops in Iraq and give them authority to conduct operations, but only with the permission of the Iraqis. [**] [******]This section would deal with immunity for American forces, long a central demand for American negotiators. Soldiers would continue to have immunity during authorized military operations as well as on the bases, [*****]said Ali al-Adeeb, a member of Parliament from Mr. Maliki’s Dawa party and a close adviser of Mr. Maliki.
The agreement does not make it clear how contractors would be dealt with. While the Americans have said that private security companies would no longer be immune from Iraqi law, there are many other contractors, like translators and food service workers, whose status has not been made clear. [*******]
The third section would be an appendix that would describe the administrative mechanism for authorizing American operations. There would be a joint Iraqi and American committee in each province that would authorize operations and a joint committee at the national level to resolve disputes. [***] [*******]
The resolution of the rules governing detainees still appeared to be unresolved, according to several Iraqis close to the negotiations. There are two difficult issues: whether Americans will be able to detain Iraqis in the future, and what should be done with those who are being held by the United States.
American forces now hold about 22,000 Iraqi detainees at Camp Cropper in Baghdad and Camp Bucca, near the Kuwait-Iraq border. While the vast majority will never be charged under Iraqi law because there is not enough evidence to bring them to trial, the American military says that about a third remain security risks. [**]The question remains whether and when to turn them over to the Iraqis. The vast majority are Sunni, while much of the Iraqi security force is Shiite.
Conversations with half a dozen Iraqi lawmakers made clear that the American government’s decision to bend on the issue of discussing an end date for the American military presence in Iraq played a large role in the reconciliation between the two groups of negotiators. [irony: Obama’s position and undercuts McCain] [*****]
“The time horizon is very important for Iraq because Iraqi has no interest in keeping American forces here for a long time,” said Mr. Sammaraie, who said that the negotiators would like the withdrawal to include all forces in order to encourage all American troops to do their work efficiently. “For instance in Afghanistan they were slow to train Afghan soldiers, and now they are having all kinds of problems,” he said.
Alissa J. Rubin reported from Baghdad, and Steven Lee Myers from Washington. Suadad al-Salhy and Riyadh Muhammed contributed reporting from Baghdad.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Al-Qaeda in Iraq Leader May Be in Afghanistan

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073003239.html
Al-Qaeda in Iraq Leader May Be in Afghanistan
By Amit R. Paley
Washington Post Foreign Service
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A01 [-ir] [hydra] [insurgency] [bush administration’s “surge option”] [some positive indicators of improvement] [nevertheless, violence while surge unfolds] [clearly, sectarian] [followup] [“surge” continues amid mixed indicators] [al Maliki govt attempting to re-assure Iran about proposed SoFA with US while committing not to allow –iraq to be used as launch pad] [the spike in violence that began this past spring continues] [tough negotiations over SOFA] [and here another piece of evidence whose accretion suggests AQI in disarray though not finished by any means] [use hydra II] [use psci469b] [***]
BAGHDAD, July 30 -- The leader of the Sunni insurgent group al-Qaeda in Iraq and several of his top lieutenants have recently left Iraq for Afghanistan, [****]according to group leaders and Iraqi intelligence officials, a possible further sign of what Iraqi and U.S. officials call growing disarray and weakness in the organization. [I wouldn’t be so sure] [it’s certainly possible] [so are many other interpretations] [to wit: leaving just prior to a dramatic coalition response which would suggest something awful shall be attempted soon?] [or any number of other interpretations] [al Qaeda proper needed to coordinate something, or that top tier of AQI in dutch with al Qaeda central, etc.] [****]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073003239.html
Al-Qaeda in Iraq Leader May Be in Afghanistan
By Amit R. Paley
Washington Post Foreign Service
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A01 [-ir] [hydra] [insurgency] [bush administration’s “surge option”] [some positive indicators of improvement] [nevertheless, violence while surge unfolds] [clearly, sectarian] [followup] [“surge” continues amid mixed indicators] [al Maliki govt attempting to re-assure Iran about proposed SoFA with US while committing not to allow –iraq to be used as launch pad] [the spike in violence that began this past spring continues] [tough negotiations over SOFA] [and here another piece of evidence whose accretion suggests AQI in disarray though not finished by any means] [use hydra II] [use psci469b] [***]
BAGHDAD, July 30 -- The leader of the Sunni insurgent group al-Qaeda in Iraq and several of his top lieutenants have recently left Iraq for Afghanistan, [****]according to group leaders and Iraqi intelligence officials, a possible further sign of what Iraqi and U.S. officials call growing disarray and weakness in the organization. [I wouldn’t be so sure] [it’s certainly possible] [so are many other interpretations] [to wit: leaving just prior to a dramatic coalition response which would suggest something awful shall be attempted soon?] [or any number of other interpretations] [al Qaeda proper needed to coordinate something, or that top tier of AQI in dutch with al Qaeda central, etc.] [****]
U.S. officials say there are indications that al-Qaeda is diverting new recruits from going to Iraq, where its fighters have suffered dramatic setbacks, to going to Afghanistan and Pakistan, where they appear to be making gains. [********]
"We do believe al-Qaida is doing some measure of re-assessment regarding the continued viability of its fight in Iraq and whether Iraq should remain the focus of its efforts," [almost certainly true] [****] Brig. Gen. Brian Keller, senior intelligence officer for Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top American commander in Iraq, wrote in an e-mail. But Keller said that the reliability of indications that recruits have been diverted has "not yet been determined" and that U.S. officials have no evidence that top al-Qaeda in Iraq leaders have gone to Afghanistan.
A largely homegrown insurgent group that American officials believe is led by foreigners, al-Qaeda in Iraq has long been one of the most ruthless and dangerous organizations in the country. But even some of its leaders acknowledge that it has been seriously weakened over the past year. [**************]
The number of foreign fighters entering Iraq has dropped to 20 a month, down from about 110 a month last summer and as many as 50 a month earlier this year, [***] according to a senior U.S. intelligence analyst who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the nature of his work.
Some al-Qaeda in Iraq members blamed the group's troubles on failed leadership by its head since 2006, an Egyptian who has used the pseudonyms Abu Hamza al-Muhajer and Abu Ayyub al-Masri. [******] Some of the fighters said they have become so frustrated by Masri that they recently split off to form their own Sunni insurgent group. [*******] [perhaps he’s been ordered to al Qaeda central for re-programming?]
Abdullah al-Ansari, an al-Qaeda in Iraq leader in Fallujah, said in an interview with a Washington Post special correspondent that Masri had traveled to Afghanistan through Iran and designated Abu Khalil al-Souri, [****]the pseudonym of another top leader of the group who came to Iraq in 2003, to run the organization in his absence.
"It's not known yet whether he would come back or not," he said, [****]referring to Masri.
Col. Hatim Abdullah, an Iraqi intelligence official in the Anbar province capital of Ramadi, said Masri and two foreign fighters were believed to have crossed into Iran on June 12 through the border town of Zorbatia. He said the information was based in part on interrogations of al-Qaeda in Iraq members. [*******]
One of those al-Qaeda in Iraq detainees, Abu Abeer al-Muhajer, a senior leader in Ramadi whose real name is believed to be Ibrahim Salih Hassan al-Fahdawi, said after his July 9 arrest that Masri had traveled through Iran with 15 leaders, [***]according to a police report and an interview with police officer Nihad Jassim Mohammed Saleh, who has questioned Fahdawi.
Makki Fawaz al-Milehmi, a senior leader of the group north of Fallujah, said in an interview with the Post special correspondent that Masri has left Iraq twice before and was going to meet with "some of our brothers" in Afghanistan. [****]"The rumors now are saying that he escaped and this is not true. He just traveled," said Milehmi, who accused the U.S. government of spreading the rumors to hurt the morale of the group. "He will come back to Iraq anytime he wants, like he has done before." [*********]
Masri "did not escape or turn his back to us or abandon al-Qaeda in Iraq," said Ali al-Qaisi, 32, the commander of a recruitment unit who lost a leg during a battle with U.S. troops in Samra. "We have been informed he left Iraq to Afghanistan for several things such as reviewing the situation of al-Qaeda in Iraq with [Osama] bin Laden." [***]
In a Tuesday briefing arranged by the U.S. military command in Baghdad, the senior intelligence analyst said he had not seen any indication of Masri's location since January, when the United States believed he was in Iraq.
Col. Steven A. Boylan, a spokesman for Petraeus, said, "Our current assessment is that he remains in Iraq." Some top Iraqi officials continue to say that Masri was killed last year, but the assertion has never been corroborated by the U.S. military. [******]
A recent communique to al-Qaeda in Iraq leaders, however, suggests that a fighter known as Abdul Khalil al-Souri [*****]has taken on an increased leadership role in the group. The document, dated July 10, was signed by Souri instead of Masri, whose name is typically attached to such missives.
Souri, who is largely unknown outside al-Qaeda in Iraq, is part of a group of 33 fighters, known as "the first line," who came to the country in 2003 with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the founder of al-Qaeda in Iraq, [*********]according to Milehmi, the leader north of Fallujah. He called Souri "the second personality" in al-Qaeda in Iraq. [perhaps now the first personality?] [******]
Abu Taha al-Lihebi, an al-Qaeda in Iraq leader in eastern Anbar province who recently split from the group, said he believed the communique was proof that Masri had left Iraq and was likely to be replaced. [*************]
Lihebi, a former Iraqi air force technician in his 40s, said one of Masri's key errors was fiercely attacking the Awakening movement, former Sunni insurgents who are now paid by the U.S. military, instead of trying to win back their support. [***********]
Indiscriminate attacks on civilians also caused the group to lose the support of local Sunni residents, [****]Lihebi said.
"Al-Qaeda losing the Sunni population is like a human being losing the ability to drink water," he said. "Because of Masri's weak personality and leadership, al-Qaeda in Iraq was weakened and split and lost the Sunni population." [******] [understandable, if true: Zarqawi was an animal but knew how to rally Sunni brothern to the cause]
Earlier this month, Lihebi said his fighters would no longer pledge obedience to Masri and were withdrawing from al-Qaeda in Iraq because of the "escalating hate against them by Sunnis due to the useless operations that ignored the main enemy, which is the head of evil, the United States." [*******]
The splinter group, which named itself after Abu Anas al-Shami, an al-Qaeda in Iraq fighter it said had been killed by U.S. troops, also announced it would suspend suicide operations so that people would distinguish between the new group and al-Qaeda in Iraq. [***********]
In a sign of what U.S. officials describe as their success in eliminating Sunni insurgents inside Iraq, the American military has recently identified an al-Qaeda in Iraq leader outside the country as a major target, [*****] [?]according to the senior U.S. intelligence analyst.
The leader, Abu Ghadiya, [***]the nom de guerre of a Mosul native whose real name is said to be Badran Turki Hishan al-Mazidih, [****]was identified in February as a senior al-Qaeda in Iraq leader based in Syria who controls the flow of the majority of the group's foreign fighters, money and weapons into Iraq, [****]according to U.S. intelligence officials. [another reason to attempt to pull Syria back into Arab camp] [it’s facilitating both Shi’ia (Hezbollah) and Sunnis (AQI)] [********]
Keller, the senior intelligence officer, said uncertainties remain about the diversion of fighters.
"We continue to wrestle with the question of whether this represents a strategic shift on the part of al-Qaida," [****]Keller said in the e-mail. "We do know that al-Qaida leaders will never give up entirely on Iraq, but they may in the future see Afghanistan or some other location yet to be determined as a place where their resources may be more effectively employed." [************]
Special correspondents Zaid Sabah and Qais Mizher in Baghdad and Washington Post staff in Anbar province contributed to this report.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Turkish Court Calls Ruling Party Constitutional

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/europe/31turkey.html
July 31, 2008
Turkish Court Calls Ruling Party Constitutional
By SABRINA TAVERNISE and SEBNEM ARSU [Turkey] [recently, an alleged coup by secular—mostly military—groups who oppose the PM Erdogan’s Islamic Party] [thus far, Erdogan’s policies have been relatively benign] [violence of 2 days ago could be related to secularists attempting to create dissonance] [could easily be the PKK’s insurgency] [could be related to jihadis] [watch in coming days for definitive evidence] [if jihadis, use hydra II] [and use psci469b] [no clear victory for either side?] [****]
Turkey’s governing party narrowly missed being banned in a court ruling on Wednesday that relieved months of pressure in the country and handed a victory to the party’s leader, [*******]a former Islamist.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/europe/31turkey.html
July 31, 2008
Turkish Court Calls Ruling Party Constitutional
By SABRINA TAVERNISE and SEBNEM ARSU [Turkey] [recently, an alleged coup by secular—mostly military—groups who oppose the PM Erdogan’s Islamic Party] [thus far, Erdogan’s policies have been relatively benign] [violence of 2 days ago could be related to secularists attempting to create dissonance] [could easily be the PKK’s insurgency] [could be related to jihadis] [watch in coming days for definitive evidence] [if jihadis, use hydra II] [and use psci469b] [no clear victory for either side?] [****]
Turkey’s governing party narrowly missed being banned in a court ruling on Wednesday that relieved months of pressure in the country and handed a victory to the party’s leader, [*******]a former Islamist.
The party, Justice and Development, or AKP, as it is known in Turkish, was kept alive by just one vote — six members of Turkey’s Constitutional Court voted to close it for violating the country’s secular principles, but seven were required. [***]A ban would have brought down the government, forcing elections for the second time in a year and pitching Turkey into political chaos.
“A great uncertainty blocking Turkey’s future has been lifted,” said Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the leader of the party, [***]speaking in Ankara, the capital.
The court case was the culmination of an epic battle between the country’s secular establishment — a powerful coterie of judges and generals that has deposed elected governments four times in Turkish history — and Mr. Erdogan, [***] a broadly popular politician whose supporters say that his past as a political Islamist is firmly behind him.
And while the ruling was widely viewed as a victory for Mr. Erdogan, and in turn for Turkish democracy, the court reined the party in, imposing a strong but not fatal sanction to cut its public financing in half and issuing a “serious warning” that it was steering the country in too Islamic a direction. [****] Legislation pressed by the party that would have allowed women in head scarves to attend universities, for example, raised suspicions about its agenda. [******]
“AKP is on probation,” said Soli Ozel, a professor of international relations at Bilgi University in Istanbul. [***]“The court clearly said it sees the party as a focal institution for Islamizing the country.”
Still, by overcoming the case, which accused the party of trying to bring Islamic rule to Turkey, the party and its supporters have prevailed against the country’s staunchly secular old guard, which has steered the country from behind the scenes since Turkey’s founding by Ataturk in 1923.
The ruling releases the political deadlock that had paralyzed politics in Turkey since March, when the case was filed, and seems to have softened the sharp polarization that had formed between parts of Turkish society [****]— those who want a more openly religious society and those who fear that too much space for Islam will end up curbing secular lifestyles. In a live news conference interrupted by jubilant supporters, Mr. Erdogan said his party had “never been the focus of antisecular activities,” and pledged that it would “continue to protect the fundamental principles of our republic also in the future.”
Turkey is overwhelmingly Muslim, but its system of government is secular. While the case against the AKP was broadly criticized as weak, secular Turks still worry that the party, with its control of Parliament, the presidency and the government, has too much leeway to impose policies that appeal to its socially conservative base. [*******]
But the ruling seemed to have something for everyone, clearing the air politically and allowing even Turkey’s most adamant secularists to claim it as a victory. [****]
“AKP can no longer continue with its previous line in politics,” said Onur Oymen, the deputy chairman of the secular opposition Republican People’s Party. “They have been granted a chance. In order to make the best of it, they need to go through some serious self-critique.”
There appear to be no practical implications for the party aside from the cut in financing, which is expected to be made up from other sources in the party’s vast middle- and upper-class network of supporters. The ruling opens a new opportunity for Mr. Erdogan to reach out to liberal Turks, who oppose the secular elite but resented his legislation on the head scarves. They felt that he had abandoned other liberal issues like freedom of speech.
“They can no longer afford to act single-handedly,” [i.e., AKP] [****] said Ersin Kalaycioglu, political science professor of Sabanci University in Istanbul, who compared the party to a soccer player “with a yellow card to be expelled from the game after one more mistake.”
The ruling was an “elegant solution,” said Soner Cagaptay, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, who used a metaphor to describe its effect: “If the AKP was a river that has overflown its banks, the court has set up embankments, forcing it back into its bed. It has not put a dam in front of it.” [*******]
The ruling came at a time of great tension in the country. A bomb attack had killed 17 people in Istanbul just three days before, and a ban of the party and its senior members would have brought great instability. On Wednesday, the Istanbul police detained nine people in connection with the blast, [****]Turkey’s state-run Anatolian News Agency reported.
“The judges must have judged that the consequences of closure would have been intolerable for the country,” Mr. Ozel said.
A government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the party had taken the ruling to heart. “A new period is ahead,” the official said. “The self-critique following the verdict,” he said, “will be seen in our actions, not in words.” [*********]
Turkey is trying to gain membership in the European Union, and its chances could have been dented if the party was closed.
“There is a great sense of relief among the Europeans,” said Joost Lagendijk, a member of the European Parliament who works on matters regarding Turkey. [******]
The case has paralleled another sensational legal proceeding — the prosecution of 86 people, including writers, members of civic organizations and former military officers who are charged with plotting to overthrow the government — and many in Turkey saw the effects of that case in the ruling on Wednesday. [*******]
The case, referred to as Ergenekon, the name of the ultranationalist organization the people belong [********]to, is one of the first public accountings of the darker side of Turkey’s deep state. [*********]
Baskin Oran, a professor of international relations at Ankara University, said the ruling was a sign that Turkey’s judiciary, long believed to be well in the sphere of the secular establishment, seemed to have broken ranks. [*********]
“Everybody is very happy with this decision,” he said. “Otherwise it would have created a hell of a situation for Turkey.”
Sabrina Tavernise reported from Baghdad, and Sebnem Arsu from Istanbul.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

NW Pakistan Clashes Intensify; Peace Deals at Risk, Taliban Says

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073000815.html
NW Pakistan Clashes Intensify; Peace Deals at Risk, Taliban Says
By Candace Rondeaux
Washington Post Foreign Service
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A13 [Pakistan] [AfPak] [south asia] [Pakistan as the new Afghanistan] [hydra central] [Pakistan seemingly on the brink] [new coalition govt is fragile and is considering negotiating with Tribals-Islamists] [precarious as jihadis thrive among those with whom new govt is negotiating] [coalition govt threatening Musharraf presidency with reinstatement of judges] [recently, the coalition takes its first military action against jihadis and others near Peshawar] [use hydra II] [followup] [as noted in recent comments in these pages, the intelligence “chatter” appears way up] [shades of 2001?] [*****]
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, July 30 -- Clashes between insurgents and Pakistani troops escalated Wednesday in the country's fractious northwest as Taliban leaders threatened to withdraw their support for peace deals brokered this year [***]with Pakistan's new government.[coalition came to power in Feb election; late spring-early summer when they began negotiating with tribals-cum-jihadis] [***]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073000815.html
NW Pakistan Clashes Intensify; Peace Deals at Risk, Taliban Says
By Candace Rondeaux
Washington Post Foreign Service
Thursday, July 31, 2008; A13 [Pakistan] [AfPak] [south asia] [Pakistan as the new Afghanistan] [hydra central] [Pakistan seemingly on the brink] [new coalition govt is fragile and is considering negotiating with Tribals-Islamists] [precarious as jihadis thrive among those with whom new govt is negotiating] [coalition govt threatening Musharraf presidency with reinstatement of judges] [recently, the coalition takes its first military action against jihadis and others near Peshawar] [use hydra II] [followup] [as noted in recent comments in these pages, the intelligence “chatter” appears way up] [shades of 2001?] [*****]
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, July 30 -- Clashes between insurgents and Pakistani troops escalated Wednesday in the country's fractious northwest as Taliban leaders threatened to withdraw their support for peace deals brokered this year [***]with Pakistan's new government.[coalition came to power in Feb election; late spring-early summer when they began negotiating with tribals-cum-jihadis] [***]
Accounts of casualties from the skirmishes in Pakistan's Swat Valley, [***]near the Afghan border, varied widely and could not be independently verified. A local military spokesman said that five Pakistani soldiers and at least 38 insurgents were killed, but a spokesman for a pro-Taliban group disputed that tally, saying that only three of its fighters had been slain. [*******]
It was the third consecutive day of violence between pro-Taliban extremists and government troops in the formerly serene Swat Valley. [****]After skirmishes erupted near the town of Matta, Pakistani security forces began enforcing a 24-hour curfew in the area, a military spokesman said.
Muslim Khan, a top spokesman for insurgent leader Maulana Fazlullah, said fighters from their group -- the Movement for Enforcement of Islamic Law [****]-- had killed several Pakistani soldiers in the latest clashes, but he declined to give specific numbers. [***[
The group was founded by Sufi Mohammad, Fazlullah's father-in-law. Pakistani authorities arrested Mohammad in 2001 after he incited thousands of young men to cross the border to fight U.S.-led coalition forces in Afghanistan. In April, Mohammad was released from prison as part of a peace deal brokered with his group by members of the secular Awami National Party, [former PM Shrarif’s party] [***]one of three leading parties in Pakistan's newly elected coalition government. Conditions of his release included a promise that the group would abandon propaganda and radical radio broadcasts and cooperate with government agencies in the region, party officials said.
But Fazlullah, nicknamed "Radio Mullah" for his fiery religious pirate radio broadcasts, has consistently flouted the terms of the deal. [****]Last month, he asserted responsibility for burning down a ski resort in Malam Jabba in Swat Valley.
Taliban influence in Pakistan has widened considerably since the country held its parliamentary elections Feb. 18. Dozens of shops in Pakistan's tribal areas and North-West Frontier Province have been shuttered or destroyed, and several girls' schools have been closed amid threats from various extremist elements, many of them loyal or sympathetic to Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud. [************]
In another sign of the increasing boldness of pro-Taliban forces, extremists have also recently executed several people accused of spying on behalf of the United States in the country's remote tribal areas. [****]On Wednesday, residents in the village of Degan in the tribal area of North Waziristan said extremists had executed an Afghan woman for allegedly assisting U.S.-led NATO forces across the border in Afghanistan. Noor Zada, a Degan resident, said he saw the body of Gulzada Bibi after it was discovered in a sewer in the village, which is about 22 miles west of the area's main town of Miran Shah. A note pinned to her body said the woman, who was in her 30s, had used a satellite phone given to her by U.S. forces to communicate information, Zada said.
The mounting violence has raised questions about whether peace deals brokered by Pakistan's new coalition government can hold up much longer. Pakistani Taliban officials have repeatedly threatened to rescind their support for the deals. But the country's political leaders appear to have adopted a wait-and-see attitude, [***] saying little publicly in response to the threats while generally acquiescing to Taliban insurgents' demands.
Pakistani defense and political analysts say Taliban threats to withdraw from the deals could spell imminent trouble for the country at large. Muhammad Amir Rana, director of the Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies, a nonpartisan research organization based in Islamabad, said the peace deals were flawed from the outset.
"The time has passed for peace settlements. When the new government first came to power, that would have been the time to really pursue peace deals. And the first condition should have been that they will never allow the Taliban to challenge the government writ," Rana said. "The best course now is to take precautions against suicide bombings in Islamabad, Karachi and other cities." [I suspect that’s true, sadly] [****]
Special correspondent Shaiq Hussain contributed to this reported.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Despite Calls to Halt, Iran Says It Will Continue Its Nuclear Program

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/middleeast/31iran.html
July 31, 2008
Despite Calls to Halt, Iran Says It Will Continue Its Nuclear Program
By GRAHAM BOWLEY [Iran] [wmd] [and domestic politics shapes its foreign policy just as with any nation state] [intersection of Iran’s domestic politicis-cum foreign policy with America’s domestic politics-cum foreign policy] [not long ago Ahmadinejad was rubuked by mullahs for making religious remarks-predictions] [followup to recent external where Iran was said to be warming to diplomacy] [the question, as always, is which faction?] [brinkmanship again after unremarkable if brief thaw] [********]
Speaking just days before a deadline set by world powers for Iran to reply to proposals to curb its nuclear ambitions, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country’s supreme leader, said Wednesday that Iran would “continue with its path” [****] of nuclear development, which includes the enrichment of uranium. [far-more significant than if Ahmadidejad said it] [the faction is the top mullahs] [not to suggest there exist no factions in the apogee of the mullahocracy] [*******]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/middleeast/31iran.html
July 31, 2008
Despite Calls to Halt, Iran Says It Will Continue Its Nuclear Program
By GRAHAM BOWLEY [Iran] [wmd] [and domestic politics shapes its foreign policy just as with any nation state] [intersection of Iran’s domestic politicis-cum foreign policy with America’s domestic politics-cum foreign policy] [not long ago Ahmadinejad was rubuked by mullahs for making religious remarks-predictions] [followup to recent external where Iran was said to be warming to diplomacy] [the question, as always, is which faction?] [brinkmanship again after unremarkable if brief thaw] [********]
Speaking just days before a deadline set by world powers for Iran to reply to proposals to curb its nuclear ambitions, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country’s supreme leader, said Wednesday that Iran would “continue with its path” [****] of nuclear development, which includes the enrichment of uranium. [far-more significant than if Ahmadidejad said it] [the faction is the top mullahs] [not to suggest there exist no factions in the apogee of the mullahocracy] [*******]
Ayatollah Khamenei’s comments suggested that Iran might be preparing to take a hard line on the demands by six nations — the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany — that it stop enriching uranium by this weekend.[***] His comments were cited by state radio, according to news agency reports from Tehran.
Representatives of the six nations met with Iranian officials in Geneva on July 19, with a senior American official taking part for the first time. The talks seemed to produce no progress on the chief demand — that Iran stop uranium enrichment.
Iran contends that its nuclear program is for peaceful, civilian purposes, but the six powers suspect that the country may be pursuing nuclear weapons. [*****]
The six nations “know that the Iranian nation is after using nuclear energy to provide electricity, but they say, ‘Because this work gives you capability, we will not allow it,’ ” Ayatollah Khamenei was quoted [****]as saying by state radio, according to Reuters.
“The Iranian nation, by depending on its useful experience and advantages of 30 years of resistance, does not pay any attention to such talk and will continue with its path,” [***] he said. [a farily extensive level of unity among the factions on this issue] [****]
At the meeting in Geneva, Iranian diplomats reiterated that the issue of uranium enrichment was nonnegotiable. But the six powers gave Iran two weeks to respond to their latest proposal before it would be withdrawn. [********]
The world powers want Iran to accept a formula known as freeze-for-freeze. [**] Under this plan, Iran would not expand its nuclear program, and the United States and other powers would not seek new international sanctions for six weeks to pave the way for formal negotiations.
The proposal, first offered last year, is intended to give Iran economic and political incentives to stop enriching uranium.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said last week that America would seek more sanctions if the latest deadline was ignored.
Ayatollah Khamenei was also quoted by state television as saying in a sermon that taking a step back against what he called arrogant world powers would “lead them to take one step forward.” [***********]
“The idea that any retreat or backing down from righteous positions would change the policies of arrogant world powers is completely wrong and baseless,” [***]he said.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

July 30, 2008

C.I.A. Outlines Pakistan Links With Militants

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/asia/30pstan.html
July 30, 2008
C.I.A. Outlines Pakistan Links With Militants
By MARK MAZZETTI and ERIC SCHMITT [bush white house] [bureaucracy] [gsave] [IC] [CIA’s assessment of Paksitan’s utility in fighting al Qaeda, Taliban, and other jihadis] [also, long-known infiltration of Pakistan’s ISI] [hardly surprising] [why only now has the CIA been willing to address the tenous situation between the US and Pakistan] ] [use hydra II] [use psci 355, 455] [****]
WASHINGTON — A top Central Intelligence Agency official traveled secretly to Islamabad this month to confront Pakistan’s most senior officials with new information about ties between the country’s powerful spy service and militants operating in Pakistan’s tribal areas, [*****]according to American military and intelligence officials.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/asia/30pstan.html
July 30, 2008
C.I.A. Outlines Pakistan Links With Militants
By MARK MAZZETTI and ERIC SCHMITT [bush white house] [bureaucracy] [gsave] [IC] [CIA’s assessment of Paksitan’s utility in fighting al Qaeda, Taliban, and other jihadis] [also, long-known infiltration of Pakistan’s ISI] [hardly surprising] [why only now has the CIA been willing to address the tenous situation between the US and Pakistan] ] [use hydra II] [use psci 355, 455] [****]
WASHINGTON — A top Central Intelligence Agency official traveled secretly to Islamabad this month to confront Pakistan’s most senior officials with new information about ties between the country’s powerful spy service and militants operating in Pakistan’s tribal areas, [*****]according to American military and intelligence officials.
The C.I.A. emissary presented evidence showing that members of the spy service had deepened their ties with some militant groups that were responsible for a surge of violence in Afghanistan, possibly including the suicide bombing this month of the Indian Embassy in Kabul, the officials said.
The decision to confront Pakistan with what the officials described as a new C.I.A. assessment of the spy service’s activities seemed to be the bluntest American warning to Pakistan since shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks about the ties between the spy service and Islamic militants.
The C.I.A. assessment specifically points to links between members of the spy service, the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, and the militant network led by Maulavi Jalaluddin Haqqani,[**************] which American officials believe maintains close ties to senior figures of Al Qaeda in Pakistan’s tribal areas.
The C.I.A. has depended heavily on the ISI for information about militants in Pakistan, despite longstanding concerns about divided loyalties within the Pakistani spy service, which had close relations with the Taliban in Afghanistan before the Sept. 11 attacks.
That ISI officers have maintained important ties to anti-American militants has been the subject of previous reports in The New York Times. But the C.I.A. and the Bush administration have generally sought to avoid criticism of Pakistan, which they regard as a crucial ally in the fight against terrorism.
The visit to Pakistan by the C.I.A. official, Stephen R. Kappes, the agency’s deputy director, was described by several American military and intelligence officials in interviews in recent days. Some of those who were interviewed made clear that they welcomed the decision by the C.I.A. to take a harder line toward the ISI’s dealings with militant groups.
Pakistan’s prime minister, Yousaf Raza Gilani, is currently in Washington meeting with Bush administration officials. A White House spokesman, Gordon D. Johndroe, would not say whether President Bush had raised the issue during his meeting on Monday with Mr. Gilani. In an interview broadcast Tuesday on the PBS program “The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer,” Mr. Gilani said he rejected as “not believable” any assertions of ISI’s links to the militants. [if Gilani actually believes that, frightening] [if lying, frighteninig] [****] “We would not allow that,” he said.
The Haqqani network and other militants operating in the tribal areas along the Afghan border are said by American intelligence officials to be responsible for increasingly deadly and complex attacks inside Afghanistan, and to have helped Al Qaeda establish a safe haven in the tribal areas.
Lt. Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the acting commander of American forces in Southwest Asia, made an unannounced visit to the tribal areas on Monday, a further reflection of American concern.
The ISI has for decades maintained contacts with various militant groups in the tribal areas and elsewhere, both for gathering intelligence and as proxies to exert influence on neighboring India and Afghanistan. It is unclear whether the C.I.A. officials have concluded that contacts between the ISI and militant groups are blessed at the highest levels of Pakistan’s spy service and military, or are carried out by rogue elements of Pakistan’s security apparatus.
With Pakistan’s new civilian government struggling to assert control over the country’s spy service, there are concerns in Washington that the ISI may become even more powerful than when President Pervez Musharraf controlled the military and the government. Last weekend, Pakistani military and intelligence officials thwarted an attempt by the government in Islamabad to put the ISI more directly under civilian control.
Mr. Kappes made his secret visit to Pakistan on July 12, joining Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, for meetings with senior Pakistani civilian and military leaders. [*******]
“It was a very pointed message saying, ‘Look, we know there’s a connection, not just with Haqqani but also with other bad guys and ISI, and we think you could do more and we want you to do more about it,’ ” one senior American official said of the message to Pakistan. The official was briefed on the meetings; like others who agreed to talk about it, he spoke on condition of anonymity because of the diplomatic delicacy of Mr. Kappes’s message.
The meetings took place days after a suicide bomber attacked the Indian Embassy in Kabul, killing dozens. Afghanistan’s government has publicly accused the ISI of having a hand in the attack, an assertion American officials have not corroborated.
The decision to have Mr. Kappes deliver the message about the spy service was an unusual one, and could be a sign that the relationship between the C.I.A. and the ISI, which has long been marked by mutual suspicion as well as mutual dependence, may be deteriorating.
The trip is reminiscent of a secret visit that the top two American intelligence officials made to Pakistan in January. Those officials — Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence, and Michael V. Hayden, the C.I.A. director — sought to press Mr. Musharraf to allow the C.I.A. greater latitude to operate in the tribal territories. [**]
It was the ISI, backed by millions of covert dollars from the C.I.A., that ran arms to guerrillas fighting Soviet forces in Afghanistan in the 1980s. It is now American troops who are dying in Afghanistan, and intelligence officials believe those longstanding ties between Pakistani spies and militants may be part of an effort to destabilize Afghanistan. [****]
Spokesmen for the White House and the C.I.A. declined to comment about the visit by Mr. Kappes or about the agency’s assessment. A spokesman for Admiral Mullen, Capt. John Kirby, declined to comment on the meetings, saying “the chairman desires to keep these meetings private and therefore it would be inappropriate to discuss any details.”
Admiral Mullen and Mr. Kappes met in Islamabad with several high-ranking Pakistani officials. They included Mr. Gilani; Mr. Musharraf; Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, the army chief of staff and former ISI director; and Lt. Gen. Nadeem Taj, the current ISI director.
One American counterterrorism official said there was no evidence of Pakistan’s government’s direct support of Al Qaeda. He said, however, there were “genuine and longstanding concerns about Pakistan’s ties to the Haqqani network, which of course has links to Al Qaeda.”
American commanders in Afghanistan have in recent months sounded an increasingly shrill alarm about the threat posed by Mr. Haqqani’s network. Earlier this year, American military officials pressed the American ambassador in Pakistan, Anne W. Patterson, to get Pakistani troops to strike Haqqani network targets in the tribal areas.
Gen. Dan K. McNeill, the senior NATO commander in Afghanistan until last month, frequently discussed the ISI’s contacts with militant groups with General Kayani, Pakistan’s military chief.
During his visit to the tribal areas on Monday, General Dempsey met with top Pakistani commanders in Miramshah, the capital of North Waziristan, where Pakistan’s 11th Army Corps and Frontier Corps paramilitary force have a headquarters, to discuss the security situation in the region, Pakistani officials said.
North Waziristan, the most lawless of the tribal areas, is a hub of Al Qaeda and other foreign fighters, and the base of operations for the Haqqani network.
On Tuesday, Pakistani security forces raided an abandoned seminary owned by Mr. Haqqani, Pakistani officials said. No arrests were made.
Ismail Khan contributed reporting from Peshawar, Pakistan.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Strategy Against Al-Qaeda Faulted

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902041.html
Strategy Against Al-Qaeda Faulted
Report Says Effort Is Not a 'War'
By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A04 [bush white house] [NSC principals] [gsave] [first time the initial response to 9/11 has really been criticized in the regular media] [the issue of how best to fight gsave] [ironic: while I agree with the forward leaning stance on al Qaeda and fellow travelers, the Bush administration has wrongly criticized Clinton administration for law-enforcement approach] [now comes study saying military counterterrorism only so useful] [use hydra II] [use psci 355, 455] [****]
The Bush administration's terrorism-fighting strategy has not significantly undermined al-Qaeda's capabilities, according to a major new study that argues the struggle against terrorism is better waged by law enforcement agencies than by armies. [*****]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902041.html
Strategy Against Al-Qaeda Faulted
Report Says Effort Is Not a 'War'
By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A04 [bush white house] [NSC principals] [gsave] [first time the initial response to 9/11 has really been criticized in the regular media] [the issue of how best to fight gsave] [ironic: while I agree with the forward leaning stance on al Qaeda and fellow travelers, the Bush administration has wrongly criticized Clinton administration for law-enforcement approach] [now comes study saying military counterterrorism only so useful] [use hydra II] [use psci 355, 455] [****]
The Bush administration's terrorism-fighting strategy has not significantly undermined al-Qaeda's capabilities, according to a major new study that argues the struggle against terrorism is better waged by law enforcement agencies than by armies. [*****]
The study by the nonpartisan Rand Corp. also contends that the administration committed a fundamental error in portraying the conflict with al-Qaeda as a "war on terrorism." The phrase falsely suggests that there can be a battlefield solution to terrorism, and symbolically conveys warrior status on terrorists,[***] it said.
"Terrorists should be perceived and described as criminals, not holy warriors," authors Seth Jones and Martin Libicki write in "How Terrorist Groups End: Lessons for Countering al-Qaeda," a 200-page volume released yesterday.
But the authors contend that al-Qaeda has sabotaged itself by creating ever greater numbers of enemies while not broadening its base of support. "Al-Qaeda's probability of success in actually overthrowing any government is close to zero," the report states.
The study was based in part on an analysis of more than 600 terrorist movements tracked over decades by Rand and the Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism. Jones and Libicki sought to determine why such movements ultimately die out, and how lessons from recent history can be applied to the current struggle against al-Qaeda.
The researchers found that more than 40 percent of terrorist movements fade away when their political objectives are met -- but that this outcome occurs only when groups are secular and have narrow goals. By contrast, al-Qaeda's religious and political agenda calls for nothing less than the overthrow of secular Arab governments and the establishment of an Islamic caliphate.
A roughly equal number of terrorist groups die when their key leaders are arrested or killed. In the vast majority of instances, this is accomplished by local law enforcement, the study notes.
"In most cases, military force isn't the best instrument," said Jones, a terrorism expert and the report's lead author. [*****] [I don’t dispute this] [I simply think it was a foregone conclusion that 9/11 response was going to be dramatic] [I fault the administration for taking eye off the prize in late 2001] [resources were then shifted to –ir which has been a pluperfect disaster] [*****]
Addressing the U.S. campaign against al-Qaeda, the study noted successes in disrupting terrorist financing, but said the group remains a formidable foe. Al-Qaeda is "strong and competent," and has succeeded in carrying out more violent attacks since Sept. 11, 2001, than in all of its previous history. Moreover, its organizational structure has adapted and evolved over time, "making it a more dangerous enemy," Jones and Libicki wrote.
The authors call for a strategy that includes a greater reliance on law enforcement and intelligence agencies in disrupting the group's networks and in arresting its leaders. They say that when military forces are needed, the emphasis should be on local troops, which understand the terrain and culture and tend to have greater legitimacy.
In Muslim countries in particular, there should be a "light U.S. military footprint or none at all," the report contends. [*******]
“The U.S. military can play a critical role in building indigenous capacity,” it said, “but should generally resist being drawn into combat operations in Muslim societies, since its presence is likely to increase terrorist recruitment.” [******]
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Scolding Donald Rumsfeld

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072901647.html
Scolding Donald Rumsfeld
Tom Ricks's Inbox
Tuesday, July 29, 2008; 12:00 AM
Tom Ricks's Inbox [oped] [interesting piece on Shinseki-Rumsfeld row] [Wolfowitz of Arabia] [so forth] [use nsc] [use psci355, 455] [******]
How does an Army chief of staff chew out his boss, the defense secretary?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072901647.html
Scolding Donald Rumsfeld
Tom Ricks's Inbox
Tuesday, July 29, 2008; 12:00 AM
Tom Ricks's Inbox [oped] [interesting piece on Shinseki-Rumsfeld row] [Wolfowitz of Arabia] [so forth] [use nsc] [use psci355, 455] [******]
How does an Army chief of staff chew out his boss, the defense secretary?
Gen. Eric K. Shinseki shows how it's done in this letter written to Donald H. Rumsfeld just before Shinseki stepped down in June 2003. During the run-up to the war, the general told Congress that more troops would be needed to secure Iraq, which earned him a famously public rebuke by then-Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz. Shinseki was said to still be angry about the dust-up when he retired.
The general's letter may be more history than news at this point, but its criticism of the way Rumsfeld's office worked does shed some additional light on the development of the mess in Iraq. And Shinseki's comments are particularly interesting because he has maintained an almost total silence in the five years since his retirement. This may be the most we ever learn about his perspective.
* * *
Dear Mr. Secretary:
. . . I feel duty bound to provide you with some of my closing thoughts . . . . While our disagreements have been well-chronicled, and sometimes exaggerated, these professional disagreements were never personal, never disrespectful, and never challenged the foundational principle of civilian control of the military in our form of government. . . .
[On his pre-war assessment that it would take several hundred thousand U.S. troops to stabilize Iraq:] My estimate, based upon past experiences, was provided in a way so as not to foreclose options for you or the Combatant Commander . . . . As a matter of fact, neither you nor Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz ever discussed this issue with me despite all the commentary in the press. . . .
[On the workings of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, or OSD, under Rumsfeld:] I am greatly concerned that OSD processes have often become ad hoc and long established conventional processes are atrophying. Specifically, there are areas that need your attention as the ad hoc processes often do not adequately consider professional military judgment and advice. . . . . Second, there is a lack of strategic review to frame our day-to-day issues . . . . Third, there has been a lack of explicit discussion on risk in most decisions. . . . Finally, I find it unhelpful to participate in senior level decision-making meetings without structured agendas, objectives, pending decisions and other traditional means of time management.
* * *
Tom Ricks is The Post's military correspondent. This feature aims to give readers a snapshot of the conversations about Iraq, Afghanistan and other matters that play out in Ricks's e-mail inbox. Have an interesting document? Send it to TheInbox@washpost.com.
© 2008 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive

Doha's Demise

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902110.html
Doha's Demise
China casts a dismaying veto on global free trade.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A14 [editorial] [IPE] [global trade] [China and India take same tack—somewhat surprisingly given their history during CW—which scuttled the Doha round] [********]
TO THE LITANY of recent sour economic news add this unhappy bulletin from Geneva: The global trade negotiations known as the Doha Round broke up yesterday without an agreement. Instead of a new international plan to cut tariffs, which would have boosted economic growth worldwide, members of the World Trade Organization proved themselves unready for such a deal for the foreseeable future. This result casts a long shadow over the WTO's future relevance and increases the likelihood that global trade will splinter into competing regional or sectoral blocs.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902110.html
Doha's Demise
China casts a dismaying veto on global free trade.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A14 [editorial] [IPE] [global trade] [China and India take same tack—somewhat surprisingly given their history during CW—which scuttled the Doha round] [********]
TO THE LITANY of recent sour economic news add this unhappy bulletin from Geneva: The global trade negotiations known as the Doha Round broke up yesterday without an agreement. Instead of a new international plan to cut tariffs, which would have boosted economic growth worldwide, members of the World Trade Organization proved themselves unready for such a deal for the foreseeable future. This result casts a long shadow over the WTO's future relevance and increases the likelihood that global trade will splinter into competing regional or sectoral blocs.
There is plenty of blame to go around. The growing anti-globalization mood in both the developing and developed countries did not make this the most auspicious moment, politically, for a deal. Then there is the unduly complex WTO process itself, which requires the agreement of all countries on all points in a multiyear negotiating "round." When it began in 2001, the Doha Round was premised on the notion that developed countries would sacrifice their traditional (and wasteful) protection of agriculture to create more opportunities for farmers in poor countries. As the talks evolved, developing countries were expected to reciprocate by opening their markets to manufactured goods and services. The United States, Europe and Japan moved modestly in the right direction, but not as much as they should have; witness the bloated farm bill that Congress adopted this year.
Still, as last-ditch talks moved into last weekend, the United States and European Union had made some concessions on farm supports, and WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy had submitted a compromise plan that seemed to draw at least tentative approval from most participants. It was at that point that India and China essentially torpedoed the talks, asserting a broad right to raise tariffs to protect their poor farmers from "import surges," price drops and other vicissitudes of the world market. China, which had been relatively quiet throughout most of the talks, was particularly vituperative, blasting U.S. arguments as "absurd," even though Brazil and several other developing countries agreed with Washington.
China's role in the demise of the Doha Round is particularly dismaying, considering China has reaped huge benefits from global trade in the seven years since it joined the organization -- with strong U.S. support. Chinese exports have quadrupled from $300 billion in 2002 to $1.2 trillion in 2007, thanks in large part to free access to the U.S. market. U.S. supporters of Chinese inclusion in the WTO argued that drawing China into a system of multilateral give-and-take would mute its nationalistic tendencies. Evidently, the Chinese see the matter differently. They, and the world, will be poorer because of it.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Drilling in Afghanistan

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/opinion/30friedman.html
July 30, 2008
Op-Ed Columnist
Drilling in Afghanistan
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN [oped] [columnist] [energy policy] [********]
Sometimes in politics, particularly in campaigns, parties get wedded to slogans — so wedded that no one stops to think about what they’re saying, whether the reality has changed and what the implications would be if their bumper stickers really guided policy when they took office. Today, we have two examples of that: “Democrats for Afghanistan” and “Republicans for offshore drilling.” [***]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/opinion/30friedman.html
July 30, 2008
Op-Ed Columnist
Drilling in Afghanistan
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN [oped] [columnist] [energy policy] [********]
Sometimes in politics, particularly in campaigns, parties get wedded to slogans — so wedded that no one stops to think about what they’re saying, whether the reality has changed and what the implications would be if their bumper stickers really guided policy when they took office. Today, we have two examples of that: “Democrats for Afghanistan” and “Republicans for offshore drilling.” [***]
Republicans have become so obsessed with the notion that we can drill our way out of our current energy crisis that re-opening our coastal waters to offshore drilling has become their answer for every energy question.
Anyone who looks at the growth of middle classes around the world and their rising demands for natural resources, plus the dangers of climate change driven by our addiction to fossil fuels, can see that clean renewable energy — wind, solar, nuclear and stuff we haven’t yet invented — is going to be the next great global industry. It has to be if we are going to grow in a stable way.
Therefore, the country that most owns the clean power industry is going to most own the
next great technology breakthrough — the E.T. revolution, the energy technology revolution — and create millions of jobs and thousands of new businesses, just like the I.T. revolution did.
Republicans, by mindlessly repeating their offshore-drilling mantra, focusing on a 19th-century fuel, remind me of someone back in 1980 arguing that we should be putting all our money into making more and cheaper IBM Selectric typewriters — and forget about these things called the “PC” and “the Internet.” It is a strategy for making America a second-rate power and economy.
But Democrats have their analog. For many Democrats, Afghanistan was always the “good war,” as opposed to Iraq. I think Barack Obama needs to ask himself honestly: “Am I for sending more troops to Afghanistan because I really think we can win there, because I really think that that will bring an end to terrorism, or am I just doing it because to get elected in America, post-9/11, I have to be for winning some war?”
The truth is that Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon and Pakistan are just different fronts in the same war. [****] The core problem is that the Arab-Muslim world in too many places has been failing at modernity, and were it not for $120-a-barrel oil, that failure would be even more obvious. For far too long, this region has been dominated by authoritarian politics, massive youth unemployment, outdated education systems, a religious establishment resisting reform and now a death cult that glorifies young people committing suicide, often against other Muslims. [*****]
The humiliation this cocktail produces is the real source of terrorism. Saddam exploited it. Al Qaeda exploits it. Pakistan’s intelligence services exploit it. Hezbollah exploits it. The Taliban exploit it.
The only way to address it is by changing the politics. Producing islands of decent and consensual government in Baghdad or Kabul or Islamabad would be a much more meaningful and lasting contribution to the war on terrorism than even killing bin Laden in his cave. But it needs local partners. The reason the surge helped in Iraq is because Iraqis took the lead in confronting their own extremists — the Shiites in their areas, the Sunnis in theirs. That is very good news — although it is still not clear that they can come together in a single functioning government.
The main reason we are losing in Afghanistan is not because there are too few American soldiers, but because there are not enough Afghans ready to fight and die for the kind of government we want.
Take 20 minutes and read the stunning article in last Sunday’s New York Times Magazine by Thomas Schweich, a former top Bush counternarcotics official focused on Afghanistan, and dwell on his paragraph on Afghan President Hamid Karzai:
“Karzai was playing us like a fiddle: The U.S. would spend billions of dollars on infrastructure improvement; the U.S. and its allies would fight the Taliban; Karzai’s friends could get rich off the drug trade; he could blame the West for his problems; and in 2009, he would be elected to a new term.” [**]
Then read the Afghan expert Rory Stewart’s July 17 Time magazine cover story from Kabul: “A troop increase is likely to inflame Afghan nationalism because Afghans are more anti-foreign than we acknowledge, and the support for our presence in the insurgency areas is declining ... The more responsibility we take in Afghanistan, the more we undermine the credibility and responsibility of the Afghan government and encourage it to act irresponsibly. Our claims that Afghanistan is the ‘front line in the war on terror’ and that ‘failure is not an option’ have convinced the Afghan government that we need it more than it needs us. The worse things become, the more assistance it seems to receive. This is not an incentive to reform.”
Before Democrats adopt “More Troops to Afghanistan” as their bumper sticker, they need to make sure it’s a strategy for winning a war — not an election.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

McCain Charge Against Obama Lacks Evidence

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902286.html
McCain Charge Against Obama Lacks Evidence
By Michael D. Shear and Dan Balz
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A01 [societal] [fact checking presidential campaign] [recent McCain advertisement that was blatantly dishonest] [more of the same from either side] [********]
For four days, Sen. John McCain and his allies have accused Sen. Barack Obama of snubbing wounded soldiers by canceling a visit to a military hospital because he could not take reporters with him, despite no evidence that the charge is true.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902286.html
McCain Charge Against Obama Lacks Evidence
By Michael D. Shear and Dan Balz
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A01 [societal] [fact checking presidential campaign] [recent McCain advertisement that was blatantly dishonest] [more of the same from either side] [********]
For four days, Sen. John McCain and his allies have accused Sen. Barack Obama of snubbing wounded soldiers by canceling a visit to a military hospital because he could not take reporters with him, despite no evidence that the charge is true.
The attacks are part of a newly aggressive McCain operation whose aim is to portray the Democratic presidential candidate as a craven politician more interested in his image than in ailing soldiers, a senior McCain adviser said. They come despite repeated pledges by the Republican that he will never question his rival's patriotism. [*****]
The essence of McCain's allegation is that Obama planned to take a media entourage, including television cameras, to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany during his week-long foreign trip, and that he canceled the visit when he learned he could not do so. "I know that, according to reports, that he wanted to bring media people and cameras and his campaign staffers," McCain said Monday night on CNN's "Larry King Live."
The Obama campaign has denied that was the reason he called off the visit. In fact, there is no evidence that he planned to take anyone to the American hospital other than a military adviser, whose status as a campaign staff member sparked last-minute concern among Pentagon officials that the visit would be an improper political event.
"Absolutely, unequivocally wrong," Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor said in an e-mail after McCain's comments to Larry King.
Despite serious and repeated queries about the charge over several days, McCain and his allies continued yesterday to question Obama's patriotism by focusing attention on the canceled hospital visit.
McCain's campaign released a statement from retired Sgt. Maj. Craig Layton, who worked as a commander at the hospital, who said: "If Senator Obama isn't comfortable meeting wounded American troops without his entourage, perhaps he does not have the experience necessary to serve as commander in chief."
McCain's advisers said they do not intend to back down from the charge, believing it an effective way to create a "narrative" about what they say is Obama's indifference toward the military.
McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds said again yesterday that the Republican's version of events is correct, and that Obama canceled the visit because he was not allowed to take reporters and cameras into the hospital.
"It is safe to say that, according to press reports, Barack Obama avoided, skipped, canceled the visit because of those reasons," he said. "We're not making a leap here."
Asked repeatedly for the "reports," Bounds provided three examples, none of which alleged that Obama had wanted to take members of the media to the hospital.
The McCain campaign has produced a television commercial that says that while in Germany, Obama "made time to go to the gym but canceled a visit with wounded troops. Seems the Pentagon wouldn't allow him to bring cameras." The commercial shows Obama shooting a basketball -- an event that happened earlier in the trip on a stopover in Kuwait, where the Democrat spoke to troops in a gym before grabbing a ball and taking a single shot. The military released the video footage.
A reconstruction of the circumstances surrounding Obama's decision not to visit Landstuhl, based on firsthand reporting from the trip, shows that his campaign never contemplated taking the media with him.
The first indication reporters got that Obama was planning, or had planned, to visit the hospital came last Thursday morning, shortly after the entourage arrived in Berlin. On the seats of the media bus were schedules for his stop in Germany and the final entry -- a Friday-morning departure -- indicated that the senator's plane would fly from Berlin to Ramstein Air Base.
When a reporter asked spokeswoman Linda Douglass that morning about the trip to Ramstein, she said that the trip had been considered but that Obama was not going to go. At that point, the campaign provided no other information.
Later that night, after Obama gave a speech in Berlin, a campaign source spoke about the canceled stop on the condition of anonymity. The official said that the trip was canceled after the Pentagon informed a campaign official that the visit would be considered a campaign event.
Overnight, the Obama team issued two statements, one from senior campaign official Robert Gibbs and the other from retired Air Force Maj. Gen. J. Scott Gration, an Obama foreign policy adviser who was on the trip.
Gibbs's statement said the hospital visit, which had been on the internal schedule for several weeks, was canceled because Obama decided it would be inappropriate to go there as part of a trip paid for by his campaign. Gration said the Pentagon had told the campaign that the visit would be seen as a political trip.
Those two statements, while not inconsistent, did not clarify whether the visit was canceled in reaction to Pentagon concerns or because of worries about appearances. They also opened Obama's camp to charges that it was offering slightly different reasons at different times.
Gibbs said yesterday that the campaign had planned to inform the traveling media members sometime on the morning of the flight to Ramstein that Obama was intending to visit the hospital but had made no plans to take reporters, including even the small, protective press pool that now accompanies him most places.
Reporters, he said, probably would have been able to get off the plane but not leave an air base facility close by. "We had made absolutely no arrangements to transport the press to the hospital," he said.
On Friday afternoon, en route from Berlin to Paris, Gibbs briefed reporters traveling with Obama. He noted that the candidate had visited wounded soldiers several weeks earlier at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in the District and at a combat support hospital while in Iraq earlier in the week -- both times without reporters.
At one point, a reporter asked, "Why not just say it is never inappropriate to visit men and women in service?" -- a key McCain charge -- "What is your response to that?"
Gibbs replied: "It is entirely likely that someone would have attacked us for having gone. And it is entirely likely -- and it has come about -- that people have attacked us for not going."
On Saturday in London, Obama addressed the controversy during a news conference. He said Pentagon concerns about Gration's status triggered the decision not to visit Landstuhl.
"We got notice that [Gration] would be treated as a campaign person, and it would therefore be perceived as political because he had endorsed my candidacy but he wasn't on the Senate staff," Obama said. "That triggered then a concern that maybe our visit was going to be perceived as political, and the last thing that I want to do is have injured soldiers and the staff at these wonderful institutions having to sort through whether this is political or not, or get caught in the crossfire between campaigns."
Obama's explanation, which came after more than a day of controversy, was the clearest in noting that it was Pentagon concerns about Gration accompanying him to the hospital that forced Obama to reconsider and, ultimately, cancel the visit.
Gibbs was asked yesterday about the continuing allegations from McCain that the real reason was a desire to bring a media entourage to the hospital.
"That's completely untrue, and I think, honestly, they know it's untrue," Gibbs said.
Staff writer Juliet Eilperin contributed to this report.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Trade Talks Broke Down Over Chinese Shift on Food

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/business/worldbusiness/31trade.html
July 31, 2008
Trade Talks Broke Down Over Chinese Shift on Food
By KEITH BRADSHER [China] [PRC] [world trade talks] [so-called Doha round] [more ideas of why it fell apart] [China’s fear of competition’s effects on China’s small farmers] [China ethos] [use psci350] [use it text] [[**********]
HONG KONG — China and India have seldom shared the same views on free trade in recent years, but they ended up on the same side at the collapse of world trade talks in Geneva on Tuesday because China made an abrupt about-face. [pretty unusual as they were bitter enemies who went to war (c. 1962) over borders] [India thereafter sided with Soviets] [*******]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/business/worldbusiness/31trade.html
July 31, 2008
Trade Talks Broke Down Over Chinese Shift on Food
By KEITH BRADSHER [China] [PRC] [world trade talks] [so-called Doha round] [more ideas of why it fell apart] [China’s fear of competition’s effects on China’s small farmers] [China ethos] [use psci350] [use it text] [[**********]
HONG KONG — China and India have seldom shared the same views on free trade in recent years, but they ended up on the same side at the collapse of world trade talks in Geneva on Tuesday because China made an abrupt about-face. [pretty unusual as they were bitter enemies who went to war (c. 1962) over borders] [India thereafter sided with Soviets] [*******]
Growing worries in China about food security now appear to have overridden the country’s previous commitment to free trade — a commitment that has served it well until now as the country with the world’s second-largest trade surplus after Germany.
Since joining the World Trade Organization in November 2001, China has been a strong and outspoken defender of free-trade principles. It has been especially critical of the United States, for example, for invoking so-called “safeguard” rules to prevent an increase of Chinese textile imports [*****] that threatened to put American manufacturers out of business.
But this week, China allied itself with Indian negotiators in insisting on safeguard rules for agriculture. China and India insisted that developing countries be allowed to impose prohibitively high tariffs on food imports from affluent countries to halt increases in imports that might put farmers in poor countries out of business.
The United States and other food exporters refused to accept the Chinese and Indian position on food safeguards, and talks broke down.
In an editorial Wednesday, the official newspaper China Daily denounced the draft text that had been under negotiation. “This proposal would put the livelihoods of vulnerable farmers of the developing world in danger due to cheap farms imports from the rich world,” the editorial said.
By contrast, the Chinese Commerce Ministry had denounced the American use of textile safeguards in 2003 by saying that it was contrary to international principles on “free trade, transparency and nondiscrimination.”
The strong Chinese stance on farm goods comes at a time of rapidly rising worry in Beijing about food security.
Food prices have soared around the globe in recent months, particularly for rice, and many countries with a food surplus have imposed limits on exports to retain supplies for their own populations. China has become increasingly focused on making sure that its farmers can continue to produce most of the food needed for the 1.3 billion people in that country, and leery of having to rely on imports.
President Hu Jintao of China made this point when he met with leaders from the Group of 8 nations in Japan on July 9. According to a Chinese government statement issued afterward, “Hu said China attaches great importance to agriculture and especially the food issue,” and he noted that China “pursues a food-security policy of relying on domestic supply, ensuring basic self-sufficiency and striking a balance through appropriate import and export.” [***********]
Chinese officials have put increasingly stringent limits on the paving over of farmland for factories, office towers and residential projects. They have also held domestic grain prices well below international levels through heavy subsidies, to the point that Chinese officials have been aggressively chasing smugglers who try to buy cheap Chinese rice and other grain and ship it to neighboring countries for resale.
Until now, China and India have had divergent vested interests in international trade negotiations because they joined the World Trade Organization under very different circumstances and are covered by remarkably different trade rules.
The world’s major trading powers forced China to lower or eliminate most of its trade barriers in exchange for letting it into the trade group in November 2001. China accepted this deal because its membership forced other countries to eliminate quotas and cut tariffs on Chinese exports _ — and these exports have been soaring ever since.
Since China has relatively few trade barriers to defend, and since its exports are highly competitive in many industries, it has tended until now to favor open markets.
By contrast, India still has some of the world’s highest barriers to imports.
India was one of the 23 founding members in 1947 of the trade group’s predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Since then, it has successfully argued that developing countries already in the global trading system should be allowed to keep much higher trade barriers to imports than affluent countries.
Kamal Nath, the Indian minister of commerce and industry, and the top Indian trade negotiator, said in a recent interview that developing countries needed to be able to protect their own food supplies. “Every country must first ensure its own food security,” he said.
Mr. Nath also contended that developing countries’ farmers have too often faced unfair competition from industrialized countries — a point that China repeated this week. The United States and the European Union agreed to accept some limits on their farm subsidies in negotiations this week, but their reductions were much more limited than developing countries wanted.
Western manufacturers facing competition from China have sometimes contended that China indirectly subsidizes its exports by controlling currency markets on a massive scale to hold down the value of its currency. China has accumulated $1.8 trillion in foreign exchange reserves through these controls, most of it in the past five years.
But currency market activities are not covered by World Trade Organization rules, and China has begun to allow gradual appreciation of its currency since 2005 — although it continues to put heavy limits on this appreciation.
There is a long history of countries’ endorsing free trade in manufactured goods while opposing free trade in farm products. The United States and Western European nations created the current international trading system after World War II and dismantled many trade barriers for industrial products but did relatively little for farm trade until the completion of the Uruguay Round talks in 1993.
A seemingly obscure technical issue had the unlikely but crucial effect of helping to bring China and India together in an unbreakable partnership this week on the issue of food safeguards.
Negotiators had agreed that developing countries could impose some safeguard tariffs to restrict farm imports in case of a sudden rise. But there was no agreement on how high these extra tariffs could go.
Reducing agricultural tariffs has been an important part of the global talks. Food-exporting nations argued that in imposing safeguard tariffs, developing countries could only let their tariffs bounce back up to current levels — in other words, they could revoke whatever tariff reductions they endorse in the current trade talks and no more.
China, with support from India, demanded the allowance of safeguard tariffs that would actually be higher than prevailing tariffs now — a demand that the United States and other food exporters found unacceptable.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

In a River Raid, a Glimpse of Russia’s Criminal Elite

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/europe/30russia.html
July 30, 2008
Moscow Journal
In a River Raid, a Glimpse of Russia’s Criminal Elite
By MICHAEL SCHWIRTZ [Russia] [former USSR] [rebirth of Russia’s inferiority complex that leads to Russia’s leaders striking in odd ways] [followup] [Czar Putin’s role just changed from leader on stage to leader behind curtain?] [now Medvedev assumes mother Russia’s rising role] [Czar Putin’s man in Moscow] [on the future of US-Russia relations] [despite same, tabloid media has thrived] [may be just a matter of time, however] [use psci 350] [use ir text] [*******]
MOSCOW — It is unclear why they gathered. A police statement said it was to discuss “escalating problems of the criminal world.” Some insiders spoke of a conflict between Moscow crime bosses and of a looming underworld war reminiscent of the bloody battles of a decade ago.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/europe/30russia.html
July 30, 2008
Moscow Journal
In a River Raid, a Glimpse of Russia’s Criminal Elite
By MICHAEL SCHWIRTZ [Russia] [former USSR] [rebirth of Russia’s inferiority complex that leads to Russia’s leaders striking in odd ways] [followup] [Czar Putin’s role just changed from leader on stage to leader behind curtain?] [now Medvedev assumes mother Russia’s rising role] [Czar Putin’s man in Moscow] [on the future of US-Russia relations] [despite same, tabloid media has thrived] [may be just a matter of time, however] [use psci 350] [use ir text] [*******]
MOSCOW — It is unclear why they gathered. A police statement said it was to discuss “escalating problems of the criminal world.” Some insiders spoke of a conflict between Moscow crime bosses and of a looming underworld war reminiscent of the bloody battles of a decade ago.
Whatever the reason, when leaders of Russia’s criminal elite convened on a yacht in the Moscow River recently, the police moved swiftly to stop the meeting.
In black masks, with weapons drawn, commandos pounced from a hovering helicopter onto the roof of the yacht, starting a media frenzy when they briefly detained 37 men known here as Vory v Zakone or “thieves-in-law.”
A Mafia-like caste forged in the Soviet gulag, the Vory v Zakone maintain a hallowed place in Russia’s criminal lore, something akin to the notorious Five Families in the annals of New York crime. [*****]
Though the Vory’s influence appears to have waned, Russians have long had an affinity for the group, perhaps because it has come to symbolize opposition to the country’s often arbitrary political and legal practices, academics and other experts say.
After the Soviet Union collapsed, the Vory v Zakone “hit platinum,” said Andrei D. Konstantinov, a journalist and novelist who has written about criminal subcultures. “Everyone started to sing about this topic, to talk about it, to make television series, write books,” he said. “It became fashionable.”
In the last 15 years the Vory have spread around the world, from Moscow to Madrid to Berlin and Brooklyn. They are involved in everything from petty theft to billion-dollar money laundering schemes, while also acting as unofficial jurists among conflicting Russian criminal factions.
Born of Stalin’s prison camps, the Vory grew into criminal barons that kept order in the gulags and governed the dark gaps in Soviet life beyond the reach of the K.G.B. While the Communist Party held a steadfast grip on government and society, they had something of a monopoly on crime.
With their own code of ethics, hierarchy and even language, they formed a society in opposition to rigid Soviet conformity, surviving on theft and black market dealing when not in prison.
When the Soviet Union fell, the Vory emerged from the broken country’s peripheries to exploit the legal chaos. By all accounts, they infiltrated the top political and economic strata, while taking command of a burgeoning mafia that spread murderously through the post-Soviet countries.
The Russian news media covered the raid on the yacht this month with apparent delight. The major channels showed scenes of commandos marching the handcuffed gangsters single file to waiting buses. [***]
Most were later released for lack of evidence connecting them to a crime. The authorities did not explain why they had conducted the raid if they had no basis to bring charges against those detained.
Some speculated that a major crime boss, Tariel Oniani, had organized the meeting to discuss a conflict with a rival don, [***]Aslan Usoyan, known as Grandpa Hassan. The rift, reports said, threatened to erupt into a full-scale war.
“There will be war and there will be blood,” said the operator of vorvzakone.ru, an Internet portal that monitors the activities of the Vory. He insisted on anonymity because of the sensitive nature of his work. He said Mr. Oniani was at the meeting and detained, but not Mr. Usoyan.
In an interview with the newspaper Vremya Novostei, “Grandpa Hassan” denied rumors of impending violence.
“We are peaceful people and don’t bother anybody,” he said. “We are for peace, in order to prevent lawlessness.”
In fact the Vory have been linked to numerous brutal murders in the post-Soviet period. Authorities have accused them of ordering contract killings and carrying out kidnappings and innumerable financial crimes.
To be inducted into the Vory’s society involves a life devoted to crime, and, traditionally, an adherence to a strict ethical code, said Aleksandr I. Gurov, an expert on Vory who headed the organized crime units of the Soviet Interior Ministry and the K.G.B. He is now chairman of the commission on ethics in the Russian Parliament.
Compared with the Mafia in Italy, Mr. Gurov said, the Vory “have less rules but more severe rules.”
Vory must have no ties to the government, he said, meaning they cannot serve in the army or cooperate with officials while in prison. They must have served several jail sentences before they can qualify. They should not marry.
Ethnicity has rarely determined whether someone can join the club. Today, Mr. Gurov said, most Vory, even those active inside Russia, are from other post-Soviet countries and are not ethnic Russians. Then there are the tattoos. Just as a Russian Orthodox icon depicts the pious works of saints, the elaborate tattoos that the Vory wear detail their criminal exploits. They also indicate rank and occupation.
In modern Russia the Vory have a certain allure, in part because of their association with prison life.
“Very many people have passed through prison, even those who have had no special connection to the criminal world,” Mr. Konstantinov, the journalist, said. “This is a theme that has been very relevant for many families.”
This intimacy with imprisonment has spawned a pop culture particular to Russia, in which the Vory and other criminal elements have taken center stage. They recently went Hollywood, vividly portrayed in the film “Eastern Promises,” which won the top award at the Toronto International Film Festival last year. Mr. Konstantinov said the film was the most accurate depiction that he had seen.
Still, despite all the celebrity, the Vory no longer seem to wield the power they once did.
According to criminologists, in the late 1980s and the 1990s, as capitalism seeped in, new criminal players entered the field. Mr. Gurov said that unlike most Vory, the top leaders of the newcomers were college-educated, and these new gangsters swarmed into the legal void left by the Soviet Union’s collapse to snatch up lucrative shards of the shattered empire.
At first this new criminal class worked in tandem with the Vory, who helped arbitrate the gang wars that bloodied the streets of Russia’s major cities during the 1990s. In the last decade the Vory have suffered a declining influence, analysts generally say, as competitors with stronger ties to big business and the government squeezed them from their traditional niches.
“Vory are still strong in gambling and retail trade, but their significance in Russian economy and society is rather low,” said Vadim Volkov, a professor at the European University at St. Petersburg, who has researched criminal societies in Russia and the former Soviet Union.
Estimates of their numbers in Russia vary. Rashid G. Nurgaliev, the Russian interior minister, said recently that just under 100 remain active on Russian territory today, though others dispute that count.
“This is just funny and does not correspond to reality,” said Oleg B. Utitsin, editor of the crime section in the weekly Argumenty Nedely. “No one knows how many there are, not even the Vory.”
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Karadzic Arrives in Hague After Protest by Loyalists

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/europe/31hague.html
July 31, 2008
Karadzic Arrives in Hague After Protest by Loyalists
By MARLISE SIMONS and DAN BILEFSKY [Serbia] [the capture of Radovan Karadzic] [good news I heard, I think while in Finland?] [I have not considered other ramifications] [it was simply a matter of justice for me] [Serb ethos] [use psci350] [use ir text] [*******]
THE HAGUE — Long one of the most-wanted fugitives in the world, Radovan Karadzic, the Bosnian Serb leader blamed for inciting his followers to join him in a brutal ethnic war, was delivered Wednesday to a prison cell in The Hague for eventual trial by a United Nations war crimes tribunal.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/europe/31hague.html
July 31, 2008
Karadzic Arrives in Hague After Protest by Loyalists
By MARLISE SIMONS and DAN BILEFSKY [Serbia] [the capture of Radovan Karadzic] [good news I heard, I think while in Finland?] [I have not considered other ramifications] [it was simply a matter of justice for me] [Serb ethos] [use psci350] [use ir text] [*******]
THE HAGUE — Long one of the most-wanted fugitives in the world, Radovan Karadzic, the Bosnian Serb leader blamed for inciting his followers to join him in a brutal ethnic war, was delivered Wednesday to a prison cell in The Hague for eventual trial by a United Nations war crimes tribunal.
Mr. Karadzic, who was arrested in Serbia last week, was taken from the Belgrade war crimes court at about 3:45 a.m., escorted by masked Serbian security officers, according to the Serbian war crimes prosecutor, [***]Vladimir Vukcevic. Mr. Karadzic’s plane landed in Rotterdam a few hours later and he was transferred by helicopter to the Scheveningen penitentiary in The Hague, where the United Nations has its own cellblock. He is the highest-level politician to be transferred to the court dealing with war crimes committed in the former Yugoslavia since Slobodan Milosevic, the former Serbian president, who was arrested in 2001 and died in his cell there in 2006 before the end of his trial. Mr. Karadzic was scheduled to appear for the first time in court Thursday afternoon for what is expected to be a brief hearing in which he will be asked to enter a plea.
“The arrest of Radovan Karadzic is immensely important for the victims who had to wait far too long for this day,” the tribunal’s chief prosecutor, Serge Brammertz, said at a news conference Wednesday. “It is also important for international justice because it clearly demonstrates that there is no alternative to the arrest of war criminals and that there can be no safe haven for fugitives.”
With Mr. Karadzic now jailed, two more top-level Serbian fugitives remain, Gen. Ratko Mladic, the wartime military commander of Bosnia, and Goran Hadzic, leader of a short-lived Serbian ministate inside Croatia.
The indictment of Mr. Karadzic charges that, as president of the Bosnian Serb republic in the early 1990s, he helped orchestrate a 43-month siege of the city of Sarajevo, devised a systematic campaign to kill or drive out tens of thousands of non-Serbs from Serbian towns and villages, set up concentration camps and was an engineer of the massacre of nearly 8,000 unarmed men and boys [*****]captured at the United Nations-protected enclave of Srebrenica, in Europe’s worst mass execution since World War II.
Court officials expected it would be six months before the case goes to trial. The transfer of Mr. Karadzic came during the busiest period in the tribunal’s history, with eight current trials involving 27 defendants. His presence in The Hague is expected to prolong the life of the tribunal, which had been due to close in 2010.
To avoid too much commotion at the prison, Mr. Karadzic may be kept separate from the other inmates for a few days, a court official said. Ahead of his arrival, the cellblock had held 37 men, among them former foes, allies and even subordinates of the former Bosnian warlord. The United Nations Security Council created the war crimes tribunal in 1993 in the middle of the violent breakup of Yugoslavia. In 1995, as the tribunal prosecutor prepared his indictment of Mr. Karadzic and General Mladic, [***]there was diplomatic hand-wringing, with Western and Russian officials warning that this would complicate the operations of the United Nations peacekeepers in the region and threaten a tenuous cease-fire.
Later, NATO troops in Bosnia who knew Mr. Karadzic’s whereabouts had orders to avoid arresting him, because Western politicians feared this could destabilize the region where he still had a large following. In the late 1990s, when NATO stepped up arrests of Bosnian Serbs wanted by the tribunal, he seemed to disappear. As is now known, he fled across the border to Serbia, beyond the reach of NATO soldiers. [****]
Mr. Karadzic, a former psychiatrist, evaded arrest for more than a decade, living openly in Belgrade for at least part of that time as an ascetic New Age guru with an assumed name, a bushy beard, a mistress and a fake family in the United States.
Before his transfer to The Hague, about 15,000 of his supporters, some bused in from across Serbia and Bosnia by the far-right Radical Party, gathered in Belgrade on Tuesday to protest the new government that arrested him on July 21.
Loyalists wearing T-shirts emblazoned with Mr. Karadzic’s image waved Serbian flags and chanted “Long Live Radovan!” and “Uprising! Uprising!” About 100 ultranationalists wearing masks, who had separated from the group, burned flares, attacked traffic lights with clubs and hurled stones at storefront windows. The police responded with tear gas, and the Serbian news media said more than 45 people suffered minor injuries.
“Karadzic is a hero because he defended Serb lives during the terrible wars of the 1990s,” said Elena Pavovski, 24, a supporter of the Radical Party, whose members sang patriotic songs next to a banner on Republic Square that threatened Serbia’s pro-Western president, Boris Tadic. “Everyone knows that the war crimes tribunal in The Hague was designed to try Serbs while the war criminals who killed Serbs are set free.”
The rally was seen as a test of the new government, which is made up of Mr. Tadic’s Democrats and the Socialist Party of the former Serbian strongman, Mr. Milosevic, which controls the Interior Ministry and the police.
Before the rally began, Mr. Tadic implored the protesters to remain peaceful. He was determined to avoid a repeat of demonstrations in February, when thousands of radicals rampaged through Belgrade to protest Kosovo’s declaration of independence, looting shops and setting part of the United States Embassy on fire.
The embassy warned Americans to stay away from central Belgrade on Tuesday night, while the embassy itself was guarded by troops with machine guns.
Belgrade had made clear it was determined to send Mr. Karadzic to The Hague as swiftly as possible to prevent an escalation in tensions and to satisfy the European Union, which considers handing over war crimes suspects a prerequisite for Serbia to join the union. Diplomats for the European Union said Brussels postponed a trade deal with Serbia on Tuesday to wait for Mr. Karadzic’s transfer to take place.
Serbian analysts said the emotional and violent outpouring of support for Mr. Karadzic showed that Serbia had yet to reckon with its role in Srebrenica, 13 years after the massacre.
“Our elites refuse to confront openly what Serbia did, for fear of being branded as traitors,” [****]Brankica Stankovic, one of the country’s leading television journalists, said Tuesday.
The demonstration coincided with an announcement by Bosnia’s war crimes court that it had sentenced seven Bosnian Serbs to prison terms ranging from 38 to 42 years for taking part in the mass killing of Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica.
Ms. Pavovski, the Radical Party supporter, said she was unmoved by what had happened at Srebrenica.
“Nobody has proved that a massacre took place,” she said. “Srebrenica is the product of a media war against Serbia and the Serbian people. Karadzic was fighting to defend Serbia.”
An opinion poll published three years ago by Strategic Marketing Research in Belgrade found that more than half of 1,200 respondents either did not know about war crimes in Bosnia, or did not believe they had taken place..
The failure to grapple with the past, analysts said, has been exacerbated by the belief of some Serbs that the United Nations tribunal in The Hague is an unjust entity meant to prosecute Serbs. [*****]
According to legal experts, as of early this year, 45 Serbs, 12 Croats and 4 Muslims were convicted of war crimes in connection with the Balkan wars of the 1990s. More Croats and Muslims have been indicted on war crime charges, but several were acquitted because of insufficient evidence, the experts said.
Mr. Karadzic’s supporters said they were incensed by the recent release of high-profile suspects accused of war crimes against Serbs, including Naser Oric, a Bosnian Muslim, and Ramush Haradinaj, an ethnic-Albanian former commander of the Kosovo Liberation Army.
Western diplomats said public perceptions of war crimes in Serbia would be critical to the country’s drive to rejoin the Western fold by demonstrating a willingness to cooperate with the court.
Natasa Kandic, director of the Humanitarian Law Center in Belgrade, said the Serbian public had been graphically confronted with the facts of Srebrenica for the first time in June 2005, when Serbian television broadcast a video of the killing of six Muslim men by members of a Serbian paramilitary unit.
But while the video showed irrefutable proof that Serbia’s police had taken part in the massacre, she said there remained public amnesia about the killings.
“Srebrenica is not taught in our history books in schools, it is not widely shown in popular culture,” Ms. Kandic said. “This country needs to have a historical reckoning about the past.”
Marlise Simons contributed reporting from The Hague, and Dan Bilefsky from Belgrade, Serbia.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Italian Court Permits U.S. to Expand Military Base

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/europe/30italy.html
July 30, 2008
Italian Court Permits U.S. to Expand Military Base
By REUTERS Italy] [EU] [Europe] [USFP and extraordinary renditions] [they’ve been used since well before George W but their use has proliferated since 9/11] [always controversial—inasmuch as represents a breach of another’s sovereignty—but formerly low-level controversy] [for short while after 9/11 several EU governments gave winks and nods to US, especially CIA] [now they scramble for cover] [followup] [Berlusconi retunrs and now he’s girlled on what he knew before] [********]
ROME (Reuters) — The top court in Italy gave the green light on Tuesday to an expansion of the American military base in Vicenza, overturning a lower court’s order for it to be stopped because of local residents’ fears about terrorism and environmental damage. [*****]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/europe/30italy.html
July 30, 2008
Italian Court Permits U.S. to Expand Military Base
By REUTERS Italy] [EU] [Europe] [USFP and extraordinary renditions] [they’ve been used since well before George W but their use has proliferated since 9/11] [always controversial—inasmuch as represents a breach of another’s sovereignty—but formerly low-level controversy] [for short while after 9/11 several EU governments gave winks and nods to US, especially CIA] [now they scramble for cover] [followup] [Berlusconi retunrs and now he’s girlled on what he knew before] [********]
ROME (Reuters) — The top court in Italy gave the green light on Tuesday to an expansion of the American military base in Vicenza, overturning a lower court’s order for it to be stopped because of local residents’ fears about terrorism and environmental damage. [*****]
Camp Ederle in Vicenza, in the Veneto region of northern Italy, is the home of the Southern European Task Force and parts of the 173rd Airborne Brigade.
The Pentagon is seeking a larger base to house the entire brigade, now divided between Italy and Germany. Personnel will be expanded to 4,500 from 2,750.
Pacifists and residents of Vicenza, a city of 115,000 people, say that the expansion will damage the environment, make Vicenza a target for terrorists and strain public services.
But the Council of State, Italy’s highest court, upheld an appeal by the government of a June ruling by an appeals court in the Veneto region, which had ordered work to be suspended. The appeals court had said that the government’s authorization for the United States to expand the base was “a political act” outside a regional court’s jurisdiction.
The Council of State also said protesters’ requests for a referendum on the issue were unfounded, because “the authorization of a military base is the exclusive competency of the state.” It said there was “no concrete evidence” of danger to the environment.
Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, a staunch American ally, approved the base expansion during his previous term in office. The center-left government that succeeded him was deeply divided over the project, but approved it. Mr. Berlusconi was re-elected in April.
Advocates of the base welcomed the prospect of jobs that would arise from expanding the base, which is on the site of a former Italian airfield.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Israelis Kill Palestinian Boy at Protest, Witnesses Say

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/middleeast/30mideast.html
July 30, 2008
Israelis Kill Palestinian Boy at Protest, Witnesses Say
By ISABEL KERSHNER [Israeli-Palestinian conflict] [following the Annapolis conference and the agreement to seek agreement by end of 2008] [Hamas’ latest settlement announcement] [followup] [proress?] [if Hamas were going to POW they likely would have done it long ago] [he’s worth far more alive] [is some prisoner exchange afoot?] [as I wondered a couple of days ago, something was up] [followup] [many Israelis support truce but many believe it’s a necessary ticket to punch before war!] [truce began on June 19] [*****]
JERUSALEM — A Palestinian boy was shot and killed by Israeli security forces on Tuesday during a demonstration against Israel’s security barrier near the West Bank village of Naalin, Palestinian witnesses said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/middleeast/30mideast.html
July 30, 2008
Israelis Kill Palestinian Boy at Protest, Witnesses Say
By ISABEL KERSHNER [Israeli-Palestinian conflict] [following the Annapolis conference and the agreement to seek agreement by end of 2008] [Hamas’ latest settlement announcement] [followup] [proress?] [if Hamas were going to POW they likely would have done it long ago] [he’s worth far more alive] [is some prisoner exchange afoot?] [as I wondered a couple of days ago, something was up] [followup] [many Israelis support truce but many believe it’s a necessary ticket to punch before war!] [truce began on June 19] [*****]
JERUSALEM — A Palestinian boy was shot and killed by Israeli security forces on Tuesday during a demonstration against Israel’s security barrier near the West Bank village of Naalin, Palestinian witnesses said.
Residents of Naalin said the boy, Ahmad Hussam Musa, 12, was hit in the head by a bullet fired by an Israeli soldier. [****]
Maj. Avital Leibovich, an Israeli Army spokeswoman, said that the military had no knowledge of the shooting but that it was waiting for the results of an autopsy.
Stop the Wall, a Palestinian group that campaigns against the barrier, said in a statement that the boy was resting under a tree after the demonstration when he was shot in the head.
Protests in Naalin against the barrier have become increasingly violent recently. Major Leibovich said that two Israeli police officers were wounded by stones thrown by protesters on Tuesday, and that one was in danger of losing an eye. About 15 members of the security forces have been wounded in Naalin over the past two months, she said.
Also on Tuesday, an Israeli battalion commander suspected of ordering a soldier to shoot a rubber bullet in the foot of a bound and blindfolded Palestinian in the Naalin area three weeks ago was placed on leave pending the outcome of an investigation by the military police. Israeli military officials said the episode, which was captured on video, indicated a command failure. The Palestinian was slightly wounded.
Antibarrier campaigners say that construction of the barrier to the west of Naalin and a military base to the south will strip the village of more than 600 acres, about half its land.
Israel started building the barrier in 2002 with the intent of preventing Palestinian suicide bombers from reaching Israeli cities. Consisting mostly of wire fence but also, in parts, of high concrete walls, much of the barrier, which is about 57 percent complete, has been constructed on land east of the 1967 boundary, inside the West Bank, leading Palestinians to characterize it as a land grab.
In July 2004, the International Court of Justice in The Hague issued an advisory opinion describing the routing of the barrier inside the West Bank as a violation of Israeli obligations under international law.
Israel’s Supreme Court, in response to petitions, has ordered several sections of the barrier route to be moved closer to the 1967 line, but most of the alterations have not yet been carried out.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Rights Group Reports Torture by Palestinian Security Forces

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902049.html
Rights Group Reports Torture by Palestinian Security Forces
By Linda Gradstein
Special to The Washington Post
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A11 [Palestine] [Gaza] [recent violence between Palestinaina factions] [mostly Hamas and Fatah] [where is the outrage in the Islamic world when Muslims kills Muslim?] [to wit: Palestine; Sudan; Somalia; Pakistan; Afghanistan; and others] [scarcely a surprise that rife with human rights abuse] [*********]
JERUSALEM, July 29 -- Human Rights Watch says Palestinian security forces in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip are responsible for human rights abuses including arbitrary arrests and torture, in a report planned for release on Wednesday.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902049.html
Rights Group Reports Torture by Palestinian Security Forces
By Linda Gradstein
Special to The Washington Post
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A11 [Palestine] [Gaza] [recent violence between Palestinaina factions] [mostly Hamas and Fatah] [where is the outrage in the Islamic world when Muslims kills Muslim?] [to wit: Palestine; Sudan; Somalia; Pakistan; Afghanistan; and others] [scarcely a surprise that rife with human rights abuse] [*********]
JERUSALEM, July 29 -- Human Rights Watch says Palestinian security forces in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip are responsible for human rights abuses including arbitrary arrests and torture, in a report planned for release on Wednesday.
"The political struggle between Hamas and Fatah has resulted in serious human rights violations in Gaza and the West Bank over the past year," said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa director of Human Rights Watch, a U.S.-based advocacy group. "Security forces from both sides have targeted activists of the other party. Their abusive behavior has victimized Palestinians from all walks of life and weakened the rule of law."
In the West Bank, the security forces are run by the Fatah movement of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. Hamas, which won Palestinian elections in 2006, routed Fatah forces and took exclusive control of the Gaza Strip in June 2007 after a power-sharing deal collapsed.
The Human Rights Watch report echoes recent findings by al-Haq, a Palestinian human rights group based in the West Bank city of Ramallah. In a report released Monday, the group documented "acts of detention, torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment against civilians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip since June 2007." [******]
Dmitri Diliani, a Fatah spokesman in Jerusalem, said there were "definitely abuses of human rights and we are committed to fixing them." But he added: "The violations in the West Bank stem from the fact that Israel has not permitted our security forces to train and has destroyed our police stations and jails. In Gaza, they stem from a military coup and a refusal to accept the other. It is a mistake to compare these two situations."
In Gaza, Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum told the Associated Press that "mistakes" had been made by Hamas forces and that violators were being punished.
Human Rights Watch said that over the past year, Fatah-run security forces in the West Bank have arrested hundreds of Hamas members and supporters, detaining many without warrants and torturing prisoners under interrogation. The most common form of torture was forcing detainees to hold stress positions for prolonged periods, Human Rights Watch said.
The report found that Hamas forces in Gaza committed many of the same abuses and that three detainees died in custody in Gaza, apparently from torture.
Western nations have invested tens of millions of dollars in training Palestinian security forces in the West Bank. The United States has committed nearly $60 million to train the National Security Force and Presidential Guard loyal to Abbas. The report found that these security forces were not guilty of abuse and that most problems were associated with the Authority's Preventive Security force and General Intelligence Service. Human Rights Watch said further aid should be made contingent on improvements in these services.
Fred Abrahams, primary author of the report, said he had presented its findings to top officials in both the West Bank and Gaza.
"Officials on both sides listened to our concerns and said they would consider them. Each also said the violations were much worse on the other side," he said. "They said they do hold violators accountable, but those words are inconsistent with the facts on the ground."
Also in the West Bank, a 9-year-old Palestinian boy died Tuesday during clashes between Palestinian protesters and Israeli troops at a demonstration against what Israel calls its security barrier. Israel Television's Channel 10 reported that he had been shot by Israeli troops. An Israeli army spokesman said the circumstances of the boy's death are still unclear and the army is investigating.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Afghanistan: TV Host Detained

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/asia/30brief-TVHOSTDETAIN_BRF.html
July 30, 2008
World Briefing | Asia
Afghanistan: TV Host Detained
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS [Afghanistan] [hydra] [Pakistan became the clear staging area for operations into Afghanistan during 2007] [AfPak] [followup] [additional indications that spring offensive is on: Taliban getting bolder in their stronghold] [hard to know where the insurgency ends and common criminality begins] [increasingly common two tracks with intense fighting, swaping pows and other diplomacy] [spring offensive] [followup] [*****]
Afghan intelligence agents detained a television talk-show host who has been critical of the government, the chief spokesman for President Hamid Karzai said, adding that private media outlets had come under the influence of unnamed foreign countries. The host, Nasir Fayaz, is the moderator of a weekly show called “Truth.” The government said in a statement that Mr. Fayaz had made baseless accusations against two government ministers, and it recommended that he be prosecuted for doing so. Mr. Fayaz’s show was taken off the air on Sunday after his television station received a phone call from an intelligence service agent ordering it to stop the broadcast, said Abdul Qadir Mirzai, a spokesman for the station.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/asia/30brief-TVHOSTDETAIN_BRF.html
July 30, 2008
World Briefing | Asia
Afghanistan: TV Host Detained
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS [Afghanistan] [hydra] [Pakistan became the clear staging area for operations into Afghanistan during 2007] [AfPak] [followup] [additional indications that spring offensive is on: Taliban getting bolder in their stronghold] [hard to know where the insurgency ends and common criminality begins] [increasingly common two tracks with intense fighting, swaping pows and other diplomacy] [spring offensive] [followup] [*****]
Afghan intelligence agents detained a television talk-show host who has been critical of the government, the chief spokesman for President Hamid Karzai said, adding that private media outlets had come under the influence of unnamed foreign countries. The host, Nasir Fayaz, is the moderator of a weekly show called “Truth.” The government said in a statement that Mr. Fayaz had made baseless accusations against two government ministers, and it recommended that he be prosecuted for doing so. Mr. Fayaz’s show was taken off the air on Sunday after his television station received a phone call from an intelligence service agent ordering it to stop the broadcast, said Abdul Qadir Mirzai, a spokesman for the station.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Sunni Insurgents Targeted in Diyala Province

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072900280.html
Sunni Insurgents Targeted in Diyala Province
Iraqi-Led Offensive in Volatile Region Near Baghdad Also Takes Aim at Smugglers, Shiite Militias
By Sudarsan Raghavan
Washington Post Foreign Service
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A10 [-ir] [hydra] [insurgency] [bush administration’s “surge option”] [some positive indicators of improvement] [nevertheless, violence while surge unfolds] [followup] [“surge” continues amid mixed indicators] [al Maliki govt attempting to re-assure Iran about proposed SoFA with US while committing not to allow –iraq to be used as launch pad] [the spike in violence continues] [tough negotiations over SOFA] [is Sadr really loosing influence] [***]
BAGHDAD, July 29 -- U.S and Iraqi forces launched a new offensive in the restive province of Diyala, targeting Sunni insurgents who have turned lush farmlands northeast of Baghdad into one of the toughest regions to pacify since the U.S.-led invasion.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072900280.html
Sunni Insurgents Targeted in Diyala Province
Iraqi-Led Offensive in Volatile Region Near Baghdad Also Takes Aim at Smugglers, Shiite Militias
By Sudarsan Raghavan
Washington Post Foreign Service
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A10 [-ir] [hydra] [insurgency] [bush administration’s “surge option”] [some positive indicators of improvement] [nevertheless, violence while surge unfolds] [followup] [“surge” continues amid mixed indicators] [al Maliki govt attempting to re-assure Iran about proposed SoFA with US while committing not to allow –iraq to be used as launch pad] [the spike in violence continues] [tough negotiations over SOFA] [is Sadr really loosing influence] [***]
BAGHDAD, July 29 -- U.S and Iraqi forces launched a new offensive in the restive province of Diyala, targeting Sunni insurgents who have turned lush farmlands northeast of Baghdad into one of the toughest regions to pacify since the U.S.-led invasion.
On Tuesday morning, the Iraqi military tightened security around Baqubah, the provincial capital, imposing an indefinite vehicle curfew. Iraqi soldiers and police searched houses but faced no resistance, Iraqi military officials said.
The Iraqi government is hoping to build upon previous offensives in the southern cities of Basra and Amarah and the northern city of Mosul, which U.S. and Iraqi officials have said show that Iraq's security forces are prepared to handle security responsibilities on their own.
Diyala, which contains key commercial routes to Baghdad and northern areas, could prove a bigger challenge. Fighters have attacked U.S. and Iraqi forces there, as well as U.S.-backed Sunni Awakening groups made up of former insurgents. Female suicide bombers have targeted tribal leaders, and kidnappings are common in the province, where both Sunnis and Shiites live.
"The goal of the operation is to seek out and destroy criminal elements and terrorist threats in Diyala and eliminate smuggling corridors in the surrounding area," the U.S. military said in a statement, stressing that it was an Iraqi-led operation.
Gen. Ali Ghaidan, the top Iraqi commander in the province, told reporters that the offensive's main target was the Sunni insurgent group al-Qaeda in Iraq, as well as Shiite militiamen who sought haven in the province after previous offensives.
"This operation doesn't have a timetable," Ghaidan said. "It will continue until we destroy al-Qaeda, the militias and the outlaws in the province."
Residents welcomed the offensive, calling it long overdue.
"We hope this operation will be 100 percent successful. We hope it will be the death blow for al-Qaeda and the militias that want to destroy the province," said Salma Abbas, 54, a government employee.
Meanwhile, in Baghdad, hundreds of thousands of Shiite pilgrims marched to the gold-domed Imam al-Kadhim shrine in the Kadhimiyah neighborhood to commemorate the death of one of Shiite Islam's most revered figures.
The worshipers gathered around the shrine, beating their chests and heads, a day after three female suicide bombers targeting pilgrims killed 32 people and injured scores.
On Tuesday, thousands of Kurds protested a controversial elections bill in the northern city of Irbil, a day after 25 people were killed in a bombing and ethnic clashes in Kirkuk as they demonstrated against the proposed legislation.
Special correspondent Qais Mizher in Baghdad and Washington Post staff in Baqubah contributed to this report.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Iraqi Army Seeks Out Insurgents and Arms in Diyala, Backed by U.S. Forces

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/middleeast/30iraq.html
July 30, 2008
Iraqi Army Seeks Out Insurgents and Arms in Diyala, Backed by U.S. Forces
By CAMPBELL ROBERTSON [-ir] [hydra] [insurgency] [bush administration’s “surge option”] [some positive indicators of improvement] [nevertheless, violence while surge unfolds] [followup] [“surge” continues amid mixed indicators] [al Maliki govt attempting to re-assure Iran about proposed SoFA with US while committing not to allow –iraq to be used as launch pad] [the spike in violence continues] [tough negotiations over SOFA] [is Sadr really loosing influence] [***]
BAQUBA, Iraq — The Iraqi Army began a major operation on Tuesday to root out insurgents from Diyala Province, where suicide attacks and roadside bombings are still
common in the area’s untamed corners, despite an overall drop in violence around Iraq.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/middleeast/30iraq.html
July 30, 2008
Iraqi Army Seeks Out Insurgents and Arms in Diyala, Backed by U.S. Forces
By CAMPBELL ROBERTSON [-ir] [hydra] [insurgency] [bush administration’s “surge option”] [some positive indicators of improvement] [nevertheless, violence while surge unfolds] [followup] [“surge” continues amid mixed indicators] [al Maliki govt attempting to re-assure Iran about proposed SoFA with US while committing not to allow –iraq to be used as launch pad] [the spike in violence continues] [tough negotiations over SOFA] [is Sadr really loosing influence] [***]
BAQUBA, Iraq — The Iraqi Army began a major operation on Tuesday to root out insurgents from Diyala Province, where suicide attacks and roadside bombings are still
common in the area’s untamed corners, despite an overall drop in violence around Iraq.
Before dawn, the Iraqi Army and police forces, backed by the American military, fanned out across the province, north and east of Baghdad, searching for weapons caches and arresting suspected insurgents in villages, farms and violence-ravaged cities.
The drive is the fifth in recent months aimed at further reducing violence and extending the reach of both the Iraqi Army and the government of Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki. [***] While American troops and aircraft took part, Iraqi soldiers were in the lead as part of the drive for the nation to defend itself and, eventually, to allow American troops to withdraw.
But as with the other operations — in Basra, Sadr City, Mosul and Amara — people in the area were well aware that the campaign was coming. That may have accounted for the largely uneventful first day.
Military officers, both Iraqi and American, said that insurgents had probably fled the area after news media reports that the sweep was to begin soon, though officials had been saying publicly that it would be likely to begin in early August.
To achieve some degree of surprise, orders to begin the operation came late Monday, catching even some military personnel off guard.
On Tuesday morning, a three-hour patrol of an Iraqi battalion along dusty country roads in the southwestern part of the province turned up a small cache of explosive devices and resulted in some friendly conversations at checkpoints, but little else.
While the Iraqi Army’s operation in Diyala is formally called Augurs of Prosperity, it is commonly referred to by military officers as the Diyala surge. It includes the participation of brigades from the First Division of the Iraqi Army, a mobile force that took part in previous operations in Basra and Sadr City. According to the Diyala Operations Command, 35,000 Iraqi soldiers and police officers are involved.
American-led forces are contributing four combat squadrons, as well as artillery and air support, but American officers insist that this is an Iraqi Army effort.
“They’re very much in the lead,” said Col. Jeffrey Holt, the chief of the American military transition team embedded with the Iraqi Army’s Fifth Division. “The U.S. is a support piece.”
Diyala is not as bloody as it was a year ago, when it was the nerve center of Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, a homegrown Sunni insurgent group that American intelligence experts say has foreign leaders. The group is known for suicide attacks and kidnappings. [***]
A series of American-led operations in Diyala since the spring of 2007 began pushing the group out of Baquba. While remnants of Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia are still active in some parts of the province — and deadly attacks remain common — the area has calmed. Shiite militias, including those loyal to the anti-American cleric Moktaka al-Sadr, have also been active in the province.
Much of the decrease in violence is a result of the Awakening Councils, groups that were formed largely by Sunni tribal sheiks and are on the payroll of the American-led forces. Though they include many former insurgents, the councils have been an effective force against extremists.
Leaders of the councils have been targets of attacks by Sunni insurgents, including a suicide bombing in Baquba last week that killed eight people.
But one major unsettled issue is whether, in exchange for their loyalty, Mr. Maliki’s Shiite-dominated government will make good on promises to integrate Awakening Council members into the security services or to secure them other government jobs. Before this operation, Lt. Gen. Ali Ghaidan Majid, commander of the ground forces in Iraq, met with Awakening Council leaders to assure them that long-term jobs were forthcoming.
“We have a plan to recruit the C.L.C.’s to merge them with the Iraqi police as soon as possible,” General Ali said, using an abbreviation of the American term for the councils, Concerned Local Citizens. Around a fifth of the council members should fit the requirements to become Iraqi police officers, General Ali said, and “the rest will be provided with job opportunities.”
While the Diyala operation, which is expected to last two months or more, may proceed quietly, it is still a test for the Iraqi security forces. The army plans to move its patrols to the countryside, gradually leaving the cities to the less experienced — and less extensively American-trained — police forces. These security forces will have to make the effects of the new drive last after the operation itself has ended.
“After we move away, the forces here have to work hard to hold on to the power,” said Brig. Gen. Adil Abbas of the First Iraqi Army Division. Otherwise, he said, “after 60 days the terrorists will only come back.”
Riyadh Muhammad contributed reporting from Baghdad, and an Iraqi employee of The New York Times from Diyala Province.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Iran’s Leader Blames U.S. and Its Allies for Global Ills

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/middleeast/30iran.html
July 30, 2008
Iran’s Leader Blames U.S. and Its Allies for Global Ills
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS [Iran] [wmd] [and domestic politics shapes its foreign policy just as with any nation state] [intersection of Iran’s domestic politicis-cum foreign policy with America’s domestic politics-cum foreign policy] [not long ago Ahmadinejad was rubuked by mullahs for making religious remarks-predictions] [followup to recent external where Iran was said to be warming to diplomacy] [the question, as always, is which faction?] [brinkmanship again after brief thaw] [strike yesterday’s comments on Iran possibly extending olive branch] [********]
TEHRAN (AP) — Iran’s president on Tuesday blamed the United States and other “big powers” for global ills like nuclear proliferation and AIDS, and he accused them of exploiting the United Nations for their own gain and the developing world’s loss. [***]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/middleeast/30iran.html
July 30, 2008
Iran’s Leader Blames U.S. and Its Allies for Global Ills
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS [Iran] [wmd] [and domestic politics shapes its foreign policy just as with any nation state] [intersection of Iran’s domestic politicis-cum foreign policy with America’s domestic politics-cum foreign policy] [not long ago Ahmadinejad was rubuked by mullahs for making religious remarks-predictions] [followup to recent external where Iran was said to be warming to diplomacy] [the question, as always, is which faction?] [brinkmanship again after brief thaw] [strike yesterday’s comments on Iran possibly extending olive branch] [********]
TEHRAN (AP) — Iran’s president on Tuesday blamed the United States and other “big powers” for global ills like nuclear proliferation and AIDS, and he accused them of exploiting the United Nations for their own gain and the developing world’s loss. [***]
But, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said, time was on the side of the poor countries.
“The big powers are going down,” he said at a meeting of foreign ministers of the Nonaligned Movement in Tehran. “They have come to the end of their power, and the world is on the verge of entering a new, promising era.”
The movement is made up of such diverse members as Cuba, Jamaica and India, and it depicts itself as independent. But most of the more than 100 member nations share a critical view of the United States and the developed world in general.
Iran assumed the chairmanship of the conference on Tuesday, and Mr. Ahmadinejad’s keynote speech was tailored to reflect the struggle against the world’s rich and powerful countries that some nonaligned members see themselves engaged in.
A draft of the final document that ministers will be asked to approve, made available to The Associated Press as the conference opened on Tuesday, reflected that struggle.
“The rich and powerful countries continue to exercise an inordinate influence in determining the nature and direction of international relations, including economic and trade relations, as well as rules governing these relations, many of which are at the expense of developing countries,” the draft said.
Iran has in the past counted on nonaligned nations to blunt pressure from the United States and its allies for harsh sanctions from the United Nations and other penalties imposed on Iraq because of its refusal to freeze uranium enrichment, which can produce both nuclear fuel and the fissile payload of warheads. Iran has faced three sets of United Nations sanctions because of its nuclear defiance; new penalties loom unless Tehran shows compromise.
While only infrequently mentioning the United States by name on Tuesday, Mr. Ahmadinejad made it clear that he blamed Washington and its allies for trying to “impose their political will on nations and governments.”
He accused the great powers of “fomenting discord” so they can feed their arms industries. [****]AIDS, he said, was also the result of world conditions “imposed by big powers.”
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Iran Leader Adamant on Nuclear Issue

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/middleeast/31iran.html
July 31, 2008
Iran Leader Adamant on Nuclear Issue
By GRAHAM BOWLEY [Iran] [wmd] [and domestic politics shapes its foreign policy just as with any nation state] [intersection of Iran’s domestic politicis-cum foreign policy with America’s domestic politics-cum foreign policy] [not long ago Ahmadinejad was rubuked by mullahs for making religious remarks-predictions] [followup to recent external where Iran was said to be warming to diplomacy] [the question, as always, is which faction?] [brinkmanship again after brief thaw] [strike yesterday’s comments on Iran possibly extending olive branch] [********]
Speaking just days before a deadline set by world powers for Iran to reply to proposals to curb its nuclear ambitions, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country’s supreme leader, said on Wednesday that Iran would “continue with its path” of nuclear work, which includes the enrichment of uranium. [***********]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/middleeast/31iran.html
July 31, 2008
Iran Leader Adamant on Nuclear Issue
By GRAHAM BOWLEY [Iran] [wmd] [and domestic politics shapes its foreign policy just as with any nation state] [intersection of Iran’s domestic politicis-cum foreign policy with America’s domestic politics-cum foreign policy] [not long ago Ahmadinejad was rubuked by mullahs for making religious remarks-predictions] [followup to recent external where Iran was said to be warming to diplomacy] [the question, as always, is which faction?] [brinkmanship again after brief thaw] [strike yesterday’s comments on Iran possibly extending olive branch] [********]
Speaking just days before a deadline set by world powers for Iran to reply to proposals to curb its nuclear ambitions, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country’s supreme leader, said on Wednesday that Iran would “continue with its path” of nuclear work, which includes the enrichment of uranium. [***********]
Ayatollah Khamenei’s comments suggest Iran may be preparing to take a hard line on the demands by six nations — United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany — that it stop enriching uranium ahead of a deadline set to expire this weekend. [****] His comments were quoted by state radio, according to news agency reports from Tehran.
On July 19, representatives of the six world powers met with Iranian officials for talks in Geneva. For the first time at such a gathering, a senior United States official took part, although the talks produced no apparent progress on the chief demand: for Iran to stop uranium enrichment.
Iran contends its nuclear program is for peaceful, civilian purposes, but the six powers suspect it may be pursuing nuclear weapons.
The six nations “know that the Iranian nation is after using nuclear energy to provide electricity but they say, Because this work gives you capability, we will not allow it,” Ayatollah Khamenei was quoted as saying by state radio, according to Reuters.
“The Iranian nation by depending on its useful experience and advantages of 30 years of resistance does not pay any attention to such talk and will continue with its path,” he said.
At the Geneva meeting, Iranian diplomats reiterated their position that they considered the issue of uranium enrichment non-negotiable but the six powers gave Iran two weeks to formally respond to their latest proposal before it would be withdrawn.
Specifically, the world powers wanted Iran to accept a formula known as “freeze-for-freeze.” According to the proposal, Iran would not add to its nuclear program, and the United States and other powers would not seek new international sanctions for six weeks to pave the way for formal negotiations.
The proposal was first put to Iran last year and presented again last month as part of a new offer to ultimately give Iran economic and political incentives if it stops producing enriched uranium.
Last week, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the United States would seek further sanctions if Iran ignored the two-week deadline.
According to separate news agency reports from Iran, Ayatollah Khamenei was also quoted by state television as saying in a sermon: “Taking one step back against arrogant (powers) will lead to them to take one step forward.”
He added: “The idea that any retreat or backing down from righteous positions would change the policies of arrogant world powers is completely wrong and baseless.”
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Turkey’s Governing Party Avoids Ban

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/europe/31turkey.html
July 31, 2008
Turkey’s Governing Party Avoids Ban
By SEBNEM ARSU [Turkey] [democracy in the Muslim world] [bush administration’s “freedom agenda”] [Turkey is a NATO ally and one of the West’s best allies in the Muslim world and broader middle east] [for past few years, at least since Erdogan and his Islamist party have gained popularity, recurring issue of religious symbols, class identity, & their respective place in modern Turkey] [followup] [***]
ISTANBUL — Turkey’s highest court on Wednesday ruled against closing Turkey’s ruling party but cut its state funding by half in response to charges that it threatened the country’s secular regime during [****]its six years in power.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/world/europe/31turkey.html
July 31, 2008
Turkey’s Governing Party Avoids Ban
By SEBNEM ARSU [Turkey] [democracy in the Muslim world] [bush administration’s “freedom agenda”] [Turkey is a NATO ally and one of the West’s best allies in the Muslim world and broader middle east] [for past few years, at least since Erdogan and his Islamist party have gained popularity, recurring issue of religious symbols, class identity, & their respective place in modern Turkey] [followup] [***]
ISTANBUL — Turkey’s highest court on Wednesday ruled against closing Turkey’s ruling party but cut its state funding by half in response to charges that it threatened the country’s secular regime during [****]its six years in power.
The case had paralyzed Turkish politics since the indictment was filed in March and had moved Turkey to a final confrontation between religious and secular Turks about who will rule the nation. [*************]
The indictment before the court accused the governing party, Justice and Development, known as A.K. [****] for the initials of its Turkish name, of trying to turn Turkey, a secular democracy, into an Islamic state.
The eleven judges began to deliberate on the charges on Monday. The 162-page indictment, brought by the country’s chief prosecutor, sought to close the party down and ban 71 senior members, including President Abdullah Gul and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, from politics for five years. [*********] [strikes me as overreach] [A.K. has been relatively moderate] [***]
Speaking at a news conference broadcast from the court in Ankara, the court spokesman said the court had ruled against the charges but that it was still issuing a warning to the governing party.
“There is no verdict on closure because the seven votes required by the constitution for closure were not reached,” the spokesman, Hasim Kilic, said. “However, in this ruling, a serious warning has been issued to the party, and I hope this conclusion will be evaluated and actions will be taken accordingly."
With its control of the presidency, the Parliament and the government, the ruling party — led by Mr. Erdogan — has come further than any other in modern Turkey in breaking the grip of the secular establishment on power.
The case called for banning the party on the grounds that it had steered Turkey, whose citizens are mostly Muslim, away from its constitutionally mandated secularism. [**]
The case was part of a broader struggle between the party, whose members are observant Muslims, and the secular elite, which includes the military and judicial systems.
The party has largely defended Turkey’s secular system of government, but the indictment accused it of trying to impose Islam.
“This ruling doesn’t mean that the party has been cleared of charges,” said Mithat Sancar, a law professor of Ankara University. “Cutting the party’s treasury funds means that the evidence for their anti-secular activity was there but not substantial enough to impose a ban. Therefore they warned the party to be careful in their actions to avoid closure in the future.” [*******]
The indictment charged that because of Mr. Erdogan, Turkey is now seen as a ”moderate Islamic republic,” an image that it said had become the official view in the United States.
It cited former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell as “having defined our country” that way, “disregarding the fact that Turkey is a secular democratic state.”
Mr. Erdogan, the indictment said, had bragged that he was co-chairman of the ”Middle East Initiative,” which it called ”a U.S. project aimed at installing moderate Islamic regimes in countries.”
Sabrina Tavernise contributed reporting for this article.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

U.S. Wary of Pakistani Appeal for More Cooperation

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902482.html
U.S. Wary of Pakistani Appeal for More Cooperation
By Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A12 [Pakistan] [AfPak] [south asia] [Pakistan as the new Afghanistan] [hydra central] [AfPak] [Pakistan seemingly on the brink] [new coalition govt is fragile and is considering negotiating with Tribals-Islamists] [precarious as jihadis thrive among those with whom new govt is negotiating] [coalition govt threatening Musharraf presidency with reinstatement of judges] [the coalition takes its first military action against jihadis and others near Peshawar] [use hydra II] [followup] [as noted in recent comments in these pages, the intelligence “chatter” appears way up] [shades of 2001?] [*****]
Bush administration officials have responded with skepticism to an appeal by visiting Pakistani Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani for increased intelligence cooperation, which he said would help his country attack militant groups and terrorist encampments [******] near its border with Afghanistan.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902482.html
U.S. Wary of Pakistani Appeal for More Cooperation
By Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A12 [Pakistan] [AfPak] [south asia] [Pakistan as the new Afghanistan] [hydra central] [AfPak] [Pakistan seemingly on the brink] [new coalition govt is fragile and is considering negotiating with Tribals-Islamists] [precarious as jihadis thrive among those with whom new govt is negotiating] [coalition govt threatening Musharraf presidency with reinstatement of judges] [the coalition takes its first military action against jihadis and others near Peshawar] [use hydra II] [followup] [as noted in recent comments in these pages, the intelligence “chatter” appears way up] [shades of 2001?] [*****]
Bush administration officials have responded with skepticism to an appeal by visiting Pakistani Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani for increased intelligence cooperation, which he said would help his country attack militant groups and terrorist encampments [******] near its border with Afghanistan.
"The problem from our perspective has not been an absence of information going into the Pakistani government," said one Bush administration official familiar with discussions this week between the two governments. "It's an absence of action."
Both governments stressed that their meetings have been cordial, and public statements underlined a shared commitment to counterterrorism. President Bush, in an appearance with Gillani after a White House meeting Monday, twice noted U.S. respect for Pakistani sovereignty. In an interview yesterday, Gillani emphasized Pakistan's desire "to maintain excellent relations with the United States."
But beneath the surface pleasantries and what the administration official called "a desire to make this a nonconfrontational meeting," there was little indication that tensions over their respective contributions to the fight against al-Qaeda and the Taliban had eased.
The differences were illustrated Monday when a U.S. missile, believed to have been fired by a CIA-operated Predator drone, killed seven people in Pakistan hours before Bush and Gillani met. [***] U.S. officials said they thought the target, al-Qaeda operative Abu Khabab al-Masri, was killed, although U.S. and Pakistani officials said yesterday they were still seeking confirmation.
A Pakistani military spokesman, Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, said yesterday that U.S. officials had not notified Islamabad before the attack. "There was no information from their side," he said. "They have struck like this many times. We are trying to convince them to share information."
Both the U.S. military and the CIA operate unmanned Predator aircraft in the region. But the military, whose Predators are based at the Bagram base north of Kabul, maintains some level of coordination with Pakistani military liaisons at the base.
Although the CIA maintains close ties with its Pakistani counterpart, the Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence, the relationship has long been tinged with U.S. suspicion of ISI links with extremists. CIA distrust of the ISI has increased in recent months, particularly within the CIA operations directorate, a U.S. official said.
Gillani said such attacks violate Pakistani sovereignty, and noted that "we don't have the sophisticated weapons -- Predators or others." If Pakistan had the capacity and the information, he said in an interview with Washington Post editors and reporters yesterday, "then we can hit [such targets] ourselves. Otherwise, it's a violation and nobody [in Pakistan] will like it."
Specific requests, Gillani said, include devices to intercept and block radio transmissions between extremists in Afghanistan and Pakistan. With them, he said, 80 percent of cross-border infiltrations would be stopped. "It won't cost much, but we don't have the gadgets," [*****] he said.
Pakistan has been under U.S. pressure to step up efforts against extremists in its North-West Frontier and tribal areas along the borders. The four-month-old coalition government argues that it has made costly contributions to the counterterrorism fight, from the loss of nearly 1,000 soldiers killed since 2001 to the terrorist assassination last year of political leader Benazir Bhutto. Thirty Pakistani soldiers reportedly were taken hostage yesterday in fighting that ensued after insurgents overran a checkpoint in the Swat Valley near the Afghan border. [****]
His strategy for the border regions, Gillani said, includes talks with "nonmilitants . . . who throw down their arms and come into the mainstream," and addressing the "root cause" of extremism with economic aid. "But force is there," he said. "When all these things don't work, we have to have action."
Gillani met yesterday with Sen. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee. [****] Obama has said that, as president, he would authorize U.S. action inside Pakistan if there were firm intelligence on al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Gillani declined to discuss their conversation.
A Pakistani official said that a telephone conversation with Republican candidate John McCain was on Gillani's schedule. He will also meet today with congressional leaders and with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Correspondent Candace Rondeaux in Islamabad contributed to this report.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Nightlong Battle in Kashmir

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/asia/30brief-NIGHTLONGBAT_BRF.html
July 30, 2008
World Briefing | Asia
Nightlong Battle in Kashmir
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS [India] [India-Pakistan] [Kashmir] [communal violence within and between that has led to the precipice of regional war multiple times] [followup ] [in 2002, nearly a war on sub continent when jihadis stormed New Delhi parliament and killed lawmakers] [well before and since, Hindu-Muslim progroms as the spark to regional war] [this appears to be jihadis revenge] [India is on edge with the recent spate of terrorist bombings] [use psci469b] [use hydra II] [*******]
Indian and Pakistani soldiers fired at one another across the Kashmir frontier for more than 12 hours Monday night into Tuesday, in what the Indian Army called the most serious violation of a 2003 cease-fire agreement. [***]The nightlong battle came after one Indian soldier and four Pakistanis were killed Monday along the border between sections of Kashmir that are controlled by India and by Pakistan. The exchange of gunfire ended by noon, said Lt. Col. Anil Kumar Mathur, a spokesman for the Indian Army. No additional casualties were reported on Tuesday.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/world/asia/30brief-NIGHTLONGBAT_BRF.html
July 30, 2008
World Briefing | Asia
Nightlong Battle in Kashmir
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS [India] [India-Pakistan] [Kashmir] [communal violence within and between that has led to the precipice of regional war multiple times] [followup ] [in 2002, nearly a war on sub continent when jihadis stormed New Delhi parliament and killed lawmakers] [well before and since, Hindu-Muslim progroms as the spark to regional war] [this appears to be jihadis revenge] [India is on edge with the recent spate of terrorist bombings] [use psci469b] [use hydra II] [*******]
Indian and Pakistani soldiers fired at one another across the Kashmir frontier for more than 12 hours Monday night into Tuesday, in what the Indian Army called the most serious violation of a 2003 cease-fire agreement. [***]The nightlong battle came after one Indian soldier and four Pakistanis were killed Monday along the border between sections of Kashmir that are controlled by India and by Pakistan. The exchange of gunfire ended by noon, said Lt. Col. Anil Kumar Mathur, a spokesman for the Indian Army. No additional casualties were reported on Tuesday.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

July 28, 2008

U.S. Says Contractor Made Little Progress on Iraq Projects

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701768.html
U.S. Says Contractor Made Little Progress on Iraq Projects
By Dana Hedgpeth and Amit R. Paley
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, July 28, 2008; A02 [bush white house] [probably mostly centered in bureaucracy] [however, the bush administration has privatized national security in unprecedented ways] [the results have been mixed] [certainly not the panacea the administration ideologues thought it would be] [it appears that they are slow learners] [second term nearly over and the administration is upping the ante on privatization of national security] [Vulcans?] [use psci355] [use psci455] [*******]
The U.S. government paid a California contractor $142 million to build prisons, fire stations and police facilities in Iraq that it never built or finished, according to audits by a watchdog office. [*******] [that’s an outrageous betrayal of tax payers’ hard-earned dollars] [why aren’t GOP members outraged?]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701768.html
U.S. Says Contractor Made Little Progress on Iraq Projects
By Dana Hedgpeth and Amit R. Paley
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, July 28, 2008; A02 [bush white house] [probably mostly centered in bureaucracy] [however, the bush administration has privatized national security in unprecedented ways] [the results have been mixed] [certainly not the panacea the administration ideologues thought it would be] [it appears that they are slow learners] [second term nearly over and the administration is upping the ante on privatization of national security] [Vulcans?] [use psci355] [use psci455] [*******]
The U.S. government paid a California contractor $142 million to build prisons, fire stations and police facilities in Iraq that it never built or finished, according to audits by a watchdog office. [*******] [that’s an outrageous betrayal of tax payers’ hard-earned dollars] [why aren’t GOP members outraged?]
The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) said Parsons of Pasadena, Calif., received the money, part of a total of $333 million but only completed about one-third of the projects, which also included courthouses and border control stations. The inspector general's office is expected to release two detailed audits today, evaluating Parsons's work on the contract, which is worth up to $900 million.
"Far less was accomplished under this contract than originally planned," the inspector general wrote. "Millions of dollars in waste are likely associated with incomplete, terminated and abandoned projects under this contract." Auditors did not give a dollar figure of how much had potentially been wasted, but they said Parsons got about 10 percent -- or $11.3 million -- of the $108 million of award fees it could have received.
Parsons said in a written statement yesterday that it had "some serious reservations about the conclusions" in the audits, saying the company was hindered by the violent and unstable security situation in Iraq. One of Parsons's subcontractors was shot and killed at close range while in his office, [****] [what does he expect?] [it’s a war zone for god sake] the company said.
Parsons's work is emblematic of other troubles in the $50 billion U.S. reconstruction effort, in which there have been widespread problems of contractors doing poor work, being late and overspending on projects. Those issues combined with bad record-keeping, lack of oversight by overworked government managers, and high personnel turnover for both the government and contractors in an unstable war zone have created millions of dollars in waste, according to the Iraq inspector general. But SIGIR conceded that Parsons's "failure to complete some of the work was understandable because of its complex nature and unstable security environment."
The office, which is charged with finding waste, fraud and abuse in U.S. spending, said a contract of Parsons's size should have had 50 to 60 contracting officers and specialists working on it, but it only had 10.
Parsons won its lucrative deal in 2004 to do security and justice work in Iraq, as part of a dozen other big reconstruction deals. Of 53 construction projects in the Parsons contract, only 18 were completed. [********]
Auditors gave Parsons a scathing report on one of its biggest projects -- a multimillion-dollar prison in Diyala that was to house 1,800 inmates and help alleviate overcrowded facilities -- calling it a failure and wasteful. The U.S. government fired Parsons from the prison contract two years ago, saying it was late and over budget. It paid Parsons $31 million, and then paid other contractors $9 million to keep working on the project.
But now the prison -- known as Kahn Bani Sa'ad Correctional Facility -- sits unfinished and dilapidated. Local residents have derisively nicknamed it "the whale." At one of the buildings, the second floor is without a roof. Gray cement walls jut up in the sky. There is no plumbing or electricity. Windows have not been put in, and walls are unpainted. Roads in the complex remain unpaved.
Al al-Mayahi, who said he was one of the subcontractors on the project, said that when the floors began to collapse because of poor materials used in their construction, the Americans refused to pay one of the Iraqi contractors on the deal and the man fled. In the past two years, al Mayahi said, nothing's been done on the project. "I'm disappointed with this entire project," said al Mayahi, who said he was also owed money on the project.
About 400 Iraqi soldiers have been camped out at the site for about a week to prepare for a major military operation in Diyala, according to Lt. Col. Ali al-Suaidi. He was horrified at the state of the building. [********]
The U.S. government says it turned the project over to the Iraqis in August 2007, but a spokeswoman for the Iraqi Justice Ministry said yesterday that it was not under their control.
"It hasn't been completed yet for it to be handed over to us," said spokeswoman Fayhaa Khudir.
The Iraq inspector general said "at this point the entire amount disbursed for this project may ultimately be wasted because the Government of Iraq currently has no plan for completing or using this facility."
Paley reported from Baghdad, and a special correspondent in Diyala province contributed to this report.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Private Contractors' Role in Afghanistan To Grow With Awarding of Latest Contracts

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701592.html
Private Contractors' Role in Afghanistan To Grow With Awarding of Latest Contracts
By Walter Pincus
Monday, July 28, 2008; A15 [bush white house] [probably mostly centered in bureaucracy] [however, the bush administration has privatized national security in unprecedented ways] [the results have been mixed] [certainly not the panacea the administration ideologues thought it would be] [it appears that they are slow learners] [second term nearly over and the administration is upping the ante on privatization of national security] [Vulcans?] [use psci355] [use psci455] [*******]
With billions of dollars newly available in fiscal 2008 supplemental war funding, the Congressional Research Service last month estimated that the Defense Department is now spending $2.3 billion a month in Afghanistan. Add $500 million monthly from the State Department and more from other agencies, and the total U.S. outlay in Afghanistan this fiscal year will be about $34 billion. [******]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701592.html
Private Contractors' Role in Afghanistan To Grow With Awarding of Latest Contracts
By Walter Pincus
Monday, July 28, 2008; A15 [bush white house] [probably mostly centered in bureaucracy] [however, the bush administration has privatized national security in unprecedented ways] [the results have been mixed] [certainly not the panacea the administration ideologues thought it would be] [it appears that they are slow learners] [second term nearly over and the administration is upping the ante on privatization of national security] [Vulcans?] [use psci355] [use psci455] [*******]
With billions of dollars newly available in fiscal 2008 supplemental war funding, the Congressional Research Service last month estimated that the Defense Department is now spending $2.3 billion a month in Afghanistan. Add $500 million monthly from the State Department and more from other agencies, and the total U.S. outlay in Afghanistan this fiscal year will be about $34 billion. [******]
The war's demands and the availability of that kind of money guarantee a flood of new contracts. A review of the FBO Daily Web site for July contracts shows that the administration, which in Iraq turned to the private sector for tasks once handled by military or government personnel, is stepping up this practice in Afghanistan. [I’m not dogmatically against private sector doing things better than public] [however, many of US troubles in –iraq fiasco have resulted from Blackwater, Halliburton, KB&R, and similar private contractors] [while their share holders have benefited, US military has been left behind] [and they have accomplished relatively shoddy results] [****]
One of the most ambitious efforts is a solicitation from the U.S. Agency for International Development, clarified on July 15, which proposes expansion of an existing program to "increase both the human and physical capacity of the justice sector in Afghanistan." [******] [beltway bandits are enraptured by this]
The work statement says, frankly, that "corruption, local influence, lack of security and insufficient salaries" along with "lack of both physical and human capacity . . . plague and weaken the ability of the formal court system to deliver justice."
To remedy this, USAID is looking for a private contractor to coordinate what it calls "Justice Sector Development," a huge undertaking that would involve working with U.S. and international organizations, as well as with U.S. and NATO military units engaged in rule-of-law issues. The contractor would work with the Afghan Supreme Court to introduce a simplified case-management system and build courthouses around the country. It would advance the development of law schools and promote "access to justice for women and public awareness of rights."
USAID also announced this month that it is looking for a contractor "to increase licit and commercially viable agricultural-based alternatives for rural Afghans" to replace drug production. The target area is the six provinces in southern Afghanistan described as "most insecure and unstable," including Helmand and Kandahar.
The goal of the contract is to significantly reduce and ultimately eradicate poppy production. In developing alternatives, bidders should consider generating income for the Afghans involved as well as promoting "anti-corruption, gender, 'Afghanization' (local project ownership) and local governance," according to the USAID proposal.
Most solicitations were for new contractors in military and intelligence projects. On July 5, the Bagram Regional Contracting Center, located within the giant complex in Afghanistan that U.S. Central Command has described as our long-term base for Central Asia, [this sort of thing probably should be at least partically contracted out] [but military and auditors need to follow closely and with hold money when results fall short] [and thus far, that has not happened] [*****]sought a contractor to supply four human intelligence analysts. They will be required to work 12 hours a day, seven days a week and to be on call 24 hours a day. They also will need clearances to review top-secret and special compartmented information, the highest clearances available.
The four are to work with the Enemy Combatant Review Board, which has been set up in Afghanistan to determine whether detainees should remain in prison. They are, according to the work statement, to serve locally as the "primary military police intelligence adviser and analyst," and as liaisons with local law enforcement and intelligence.
Another notice, posted on July 15, called for a private contractor to design and construct a commercial customs building at a border-crossing point between Afghanistan and Tajikistan at Nizhny Pyandzh, Tajikistan. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Afghanistan will supervise the job, which is expected to cost nearly $10 million and take nine months to complete.
This is not the first project at this border-crossing spot, which at one point was considered an outlet for drugs. In 2006, with $4 million in anti-narcotics money from the Department of Defense, a border-crossing facility was constructed after the area was first cleared of mines and unexploded ordnance. It was built with fencing, guard towers, gates, lights and housing for 30 people.
In addition, U.S. engineers supervised construction of a $37 million bridge across the Oxus River at the Nizhny Pyandzh border, [again, this sort of thing is fine from my viewpoint] [it’s interrogations, and other national-security functions that have hurt administration’s cause] [***] funded by the United States and other countries.
National security and intelligence reporter Walter Pincus pores over the speeches, reports, transcripts and other documents that flood Washington and every week uncovers the fine print that rarely makes headlines -- but should. If you have any items that fit the bill, please send them tofineprint@washpost.com.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

U.S. Says 3 Iraqis Killed In June Were Law-Abiding

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701447.html
U.S. Says 3 Iraqis Killed In June Were Law-Abiding
Military Expresses Regrets Amid Security Negotiations
By Sudarsan Raghavan and Qais Mizher
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, July 28, 2008; A10 [bush white house] [bureaucracy] [dod] [fog of war?] [pressures of day-in-day-out violence aimed at US military?] [alas, while US policy truly seeks to avoid civilian casualties, this has happened far too much in –iraq and Afghanistan] [followup] [use psci355] [use psci455] [*****]
BAGHDAD, July 27 -- The U.S. military acknowledged Sunday that American soldiers killed three "law abiding" Iraqi civilians last month as the Iraqis traveled to their jobs at the Baghdad airport. The military had initially said the soldiers acted in self-defense after being fired upon by "criminals."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701447.html
U.S. Says 3 Iraqis Killed In June Were Law-Abiding
Military Expresses Regrets Amid Security Negotiations
By Sudarsan Raghavan and Qais Mizher
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, July 28, 2008; A10 [bush white house] [bureaucracy] [dod] [fog of war?] [pressures of day-in-day-out violence aimed at US military?] [alas, while US policy truly seeks to avoid civilian casualties, this has happened far too much in –iraq and Afghanistan] [followup] [use psci355] [use psci455] [*****]
BAGHDAD, July 27 -- The U.S. military acknowledged Sunday that American soldiers killed three "law abiding" Iraqi civilians last month as the Iraqis traveled to their jobs at the Baghdad airport. The military had initially said the soldiers acted in self-defense after being fired upon by "criminals."
In fact, no weapons were found in the civilians' car, the military said, adding that an investigation concluded that neither the soldiers nor the civilians were to blame for the incident.
"This was an extremely unfortunate and tragic incident," Army Col. Allen W. Batschelet, chief of staff for the 4th Infantry Division, said in an e-mailed statement. "Our deepest regrets of sympathy and condolences go out to the family."
The announcement comes as the United States and Iraq are embroiled in delicate negotiations over a security pact that will govern U.S. military operations and jurisdiction after a U.N. mandate expires at the end of the year. The Iraqis have demanded that U.S. soldiers no longer be immune from prosecution under Iraqi law.
Their arguments have been bolstered recently by high-profile incidents in which U.S. troops have been found to have killed civilians. Last week, U.S. Special Forces killed the son and nephew of the governor of Salahuddin province in northern Iraq, prompting U.S. military officials to issue a statement saying they would offer condolences.
Last month, a U.S. military operation near Karbala resulted in the death of a man identified by some officials as a cousin of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and by others as a close associate of his. U.S. officials said troops acted in self-defense, but the incident sparked widespread anger among Iraqi officials.
The family of Hafeidh Aboud, one of the three civilians killed on their way to the airport last month, said late Sunday night that the U.S. soldiers responsible should be prosecuted either in the United States or in Iraq.
"Why did they do this to us? My father liked the Americans very much," said Mohammed Hafeidh Aboud, 21, one of Hafeidh Aboud's seven children. "The American soldiers are guilty. Why did they do this? Why?"
The shooting took place June 25 as Hafeidh Aboud was on his way to Rasheed Bank, where he had worked for 33 years. In the car with him were employees Suroor Ahmed, 32, and Maha Youssef, 31.
Around that time, a convoy of American soldiers from the 4th Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (Light), were traveling in the vicinity, the military said. One of the vehicles developed mechanical problems and pulled off along a road adjacent to the airport.
About 8:40 a.m., as soldiers tried to repair the vehicle, Aboud's Opel approached the rear of the parked convoy, according to the military and witnesses. The military said in a statement that the car was speeding toward the soldiers, who viewed it as a threat. "When the vehicle failed to respond to the soldiers' warning measures, it was engaged with small arms fire," the statement said.
The three civilians died instantly.
"The criminals, who were traveling in a northerly direction near Baghdad International Airport fired at the Soldiers," the military said in the statement, released the day of the incident. "The soldiers returned fire, which resulted in the vehicle running off the road and striking a wall. The vehicle then exploded. All three criminals were killed in the incident. A weapon was recovered from the wreckage."
Two vehicles in the convoy, the military added, "received bullet hole damage from the small arms fire."
Relatives of the victims, as well as Iraqi police officials and employees of a private security firm that staffs the checkpoints along the airport road, expressed skepticism at the time. The checkpoints in the area are numerous and rigorous.
"I was surprised," said a senior police official responsible for the airport road, speaking on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment. "You know it's a safe and secure area. How can anyone shoot at them?"
When Mohammed Aboud heard the allegations that his father had attacked U.S. soldiers, he was shocked.
"My father couldn't even hold a weapon. He didn't know how to use one," he said. "He taught us when someone slaps you in your face, tell him thank you and don't retaliate."
A week after the incident, U.S. military officers offered $10,000 each to the families of the three victims, Mohammed Aboud said. But he said the families refused the sum and demanded a written apology.
"It was only $10,000," he said. "My father was the main provider for our family. We are displaced people. We also have to replace our car.
"We are in a very difficult time."
Maliki, the prime minister, called for an investigation into the incident.
On Sunday, the military said that the investigation "confirmed no weapon was recovered from the vehicle" and that the initial statement rose out of "numerous soldier witnesses who strongly believe they were being fired upon from the vehicle." There had also been "a misunderstanding" that Iraqi policemen at the scene had collected a weapon, [just doesn’t sound right] [****] the military said.
Batschelet, the 4th Infantry Division chief of staff, said: "We are taking several corrective measures to amend and eliminate the possibility of such situations happening in the future."
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

U.S. Military Says Soldiers Fired on Civilians

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/middleeast/28iraq.html
July 28, 2008
U.S. Military Says Soldiers Fired on Civilians
By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr. [bush white house] [bureaucracy] [dod] [fog of war?] [pressures of day-in-day-out violence aimed at US military?] [alas, while US policy truly seeks to avoid civilian casualties, this has happened far too much in –iraq and Afghanistan] [followup] [use psci355] [use psci455] [*****]
BAGHDAD — The American military admitted Sunday night that a platoon of soldiers raked a car of innocent Iraqi civilians with hundreds of rounds of gunfire and that the military then issued a news release larded with misstatements, [per usual, the coverup is probably at least as damaging as the screwup] [****] asserting that the victims were criminals who had fired on the troops.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/middleeast/28iraq.html
July 28, 2008
U.S. Military Says Soldiers Fired on Civilians
By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr. [bush white house] [bureaucracy] [dod] [fog of war?] [pressures of day-in-day-out violence aimed at US military?] [alas, while US policy truly seeks to avoid civilian casualties, this has happened far too much in –iraq and Afghanistan] [followup] [use psci355] [use psci455] [*****]
BAGHDAD — The American military admitted Sunday night that a platoon of soldiers raked a car of innocent Iraqi civilians with hundreds of rounds of gunfire and that the military then issued a news release larded with misstatements, [per usual, the coverup is probably at least as damaging as the screwup] [****] asserting that the victims were criminals who had fired on the troops.
The attack on June 25 killed three people, a man and two women, as they drove to work at a bank at Baghdad’s airport. The attack infuriated Iraqi officials and even prompted the Iraqi armed forces general command to call the shooting cold-blooded murder. [***]
It also bolstered calls from Iraqi politicians to pressure the American military to leave Iraq after this year, when a United Nations mandate expires, unless the United States agrees to permit its soldiers to be subject to criminal prosecution under Iraqi law for attacks on civilians.
In a statement issued late Sunday, the American military said that “a thorough investigation determined that the driver and passengers were law-abiding citizens of Iraq.” It added that the soldiers were not at fault for the killings because they had fired warning shots and exercised proper “escalation of force” [***] measures before they opened fire on the people in the car.
But the findings called into question the way the military handled the aftermath of the shootings.
For example, a key assertion of the news release issued by the military on the day of the killings was that “a weapon was recovered from the wreckage.” But the military said Sunday that no one claimed to have found a weapon in the car or had seen a weapon taken from it.
Instead, one of the soldiers at the scene reported seeing an Iraqi police officer pull something from the burned car and then place it in the front seat of an ambulance, according to Lt. Col. Steve Stover, a spokesman for the Fourth Infantry Division, which patrols Baghdad.
The soldier never said the item pulled from the car was a weapon, he said. But the soldier’s account nevertheless formed the basis for a statement in an initial internal military assessment of the attack, which said that a weapon had been pulled from the car.
“We don’t believe there was any cover-up,” [***] [doesn’t really pass smell test] Colonel Stover said.
The investigation also revealed that the car had already passed through a major checkpoint leading into the airport, which required the occupants to submit to a thorough search for weapons and other dangerous objects. As they had many times before, the bank employees then drove down the main civilian road to the airport.
But this time they encountered a four-vehicle military convoy that was not supposed to be there. The convoy had taken the wrong road and failed to turn into a military checkpoint. Instead, the military vehicles had traveled down a road that serves as the main entry for thousands of Iraqis who drive to the Baghdad airport.
The convoy had stopped on the side of the road to try to fix a problem with a vehicle when the car with the bank employees approached. A soldier guarding the rear of the convoy fired several warning shots, [****] according to Colonel Stover. When the car did not stop, 9 of the 18 soldiers in the platoon opened fire.
In its initial news release about the killings, the military said that the car then crashed and “exploded.” But that, too, was false, Colonel Stover said. After the shootings, the car’s engine compartment ignited, he said, and the fire then “spread throughout the car.”
Soldiers also fired warning shots near at least two other vehicles, causing them to stop and turn around. Some of the soldiers involved in the shooting had previously been involved in what the military calls “escalation of force” episodes involving civilians, he added.
In addition, the military had stated last month that two vehicles in the convoy had sustained “bullet hole damage” from the supposed attack. But on Sunday the military changed its story about that, saying that while there was a fresh bullet mark on one vehicle, it had nothing to do with the June 25 attack.
The soldiers “thought they were in danger, they really did,” Colonel Stover said, adding that the soldiers said they had thought they saw gunfire. “We now know there were no weapons in the car, and there were not any shell casings.” The military’s investigating officer filed his report on the attack on July 7, and the soldiers involved returned to duty on July 15.
“This was an extremely unfortunate and tragic incident,” Col. Allen Batschelet, chief of staff for the Fourth Infantry Division, said in the statement issued Sunday night. He said the military would take “several corrective measures to amend and eliminate the possibility of such situations happening in the future.”
According to Colonel Stover, those measures include ensuring that troops do not accidentally travel down the civilian road to the airport as well as reviewing escalation of force procedures “to see if they are meeting needs of the current environment.”
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

In Russia, 'Legal Nihilism' as Usual

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701168.html
In Russia, 'Legal Nihilism' as Usual
By Jackson Diehl
Monday, July 28, 2008; A17 [oped] [Russia] [former USSR] [rebirth of Russia’s inferiority complex that leads to Russia’s leaders striking in odd ways] [followup] [Czar Putin’s role just changed from leader on stage to leader behind curtain?] [now Medvedev assumes mother Russia’s rising role] [Czar Putin’s man in Moscow] [on the future of US-Russia relations] [********]
Though he had been handpicked by Vladimir Putin, Dmitry Medvedev's inauguration as Russia's president in early May inspired some in the West to hope for real change in the Kremlin. The expectations rested largely on Medvedev's background as a law professor who, unlike Putin, had no history with the Soviet KGB. [***] There was also his surprisingly strong rhetoric about the "legal nihilism" that he said was holding back Russia's "modern development." [****]"We must achieve true respect for the law," the 42-year-old president declared shortly after being sworn in.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701168.html
In Russia, 'Legal Nihilism' as Usual
By Jackson Diehl
Monday, July 28, 2008; A17 [oped] [Russia] [former USSR] [rebirth of Russia’s inferiority complex that leads to Russia’s leaders striking in odd ways] [followup] [Czar Putin’s role just changed from leader on stage to leader behind curtain?] [now Medvedev assumes mother Russia’s rising role] [Czar Putin’s man in Moscow] [on the future of US-Russia relations] [********]
Though he had been handpicked by Vladimir Putin, Dmitry Medvedev's inauguration as Russia's president in early May inspired some in the West to hope for real change in the Kremlin. The expectations rested largely on Medvedev's background as a law professor who, unlike Putin, had no history with the Soviet KGB. [***] There was also his surprisingly strong rhetoric about the "legal nihilism" that he said was holding back Russia's "modern development." [****]"We must achieve true respect for the law," the 42-year-old president declared shortly after being sworn in.
Nearly three months later Medvedev already has established a pretty strong track record on legal affairs both domestic and foreign. Unfortunately, it is precisely the opposite of what he led his would-be admirers to expect. [********]
One of those might have been Robert Dudley, chief executive of the oil company TNK-BP, which is a joint venture between British Petroleum and a group of Russian oligarchs. Dudley was forced out of Russia last Thursday by what he called a "series of unprecedented inquiries, investigations and checks," including government officials' refusal to renew his work permit and visa.
Dudley and BP are nominally embroiled in a power struggle with their Russian partners, who claim that TNK-BP, Russia's third-largest oil company, has been poorly managed. But this supposedly private business dispute has been marked by relentless and one-sided intervention by the Kremlin's law enforcers. Since March, Dudley has been told that he's under investigation by the interior ministry for tax evasion and notified by prosecutors of a probe into alleged labor violations. His offices were raided by the FSB, the modern-day KGB. The labor inspectorate imposed a fine. A court order annulled the visas of 148 BP technicians. [*****] [visa revoked while I was in Russia] [not much talk on street but coverage in NYTs available as well as BBC] [******]
There's little doubt among foreign diplomats about what's motivating this onslaught: The government intends to force BP to turn over control of the oil company and its reserves to a state-owned firm. Similar tactics were used to pressure Royal Dutch Shell to deliver control of a gas project to Gazprom in 2006. Before that were the tax cases and criminal prosecutions that Putin used to destroy and confiscate the Yukos oil company and send its founder, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, to a Siberian prison camp.
Khodorkovsky, who has spent nearly five years in prison, was another one who hoped Medvedev would be different. He recently filed a request for parole, for which he became eligible in October 2007. Medvedev could have signaled a clear break with the past by ending the persecution of a man who provoked Putin's wrath by promoting democracy and the rule of law. Instead, he blandly told foreign journalists this month that Khodorkovsky's case should be handled by "law enforcement authorities." Prosecutors duly filed a new set of charges that could keep Khodorkovsky imprisoned for many more years. [******]
So much, then, for domestic reform. What about international law? [***] After all, Medvedev issued a new foreign policy doctrine this month that cited "the supremacy of law in international relations" as one of three top priorities. Ask a Russian diplomat what that means, and you'll hear a lecture about how the United States should be constrained by international treaties and prohibited from taking any action -- such as recognizing the independence of Kosovo or sanctioning Zimbabwe -- not authorized by the U.N. Security Council, where Moscow has a veto. [why is that surprising to the author?] [****]
Yet the law still doesn't seem to matter when it comes to Russia's oil and gas contracts with European countries, which Putin regularly used as a tool for bullying. Just ask the Czech government, which on July 8 signed a deal with the United States to base a missile defense radar on its territory. The next day its oil supplies from Russia mysteriously dropped 40 percent, a blatant violation of the legal agreement between the two countries. Russian officials blamed unspecified pipeline problems -- only to report last week that Putin, in his new capacity as prime minister, had ordered the resumption of deliveries.
More serious is the predicament of Georgia, the former Soviet republic that has embraced democracy and sought NATO membership. [****]Since shortly before Medvedev took office, Russian warplanes have been systematically violating Georgian airspace, shooting down Georgian drone aircraft on several occasions. In breach of a U.N.-sponsored agreement, Moscow has dispatched security forces to the separatist region of Abkhazia and granted legal recognition to its self-declared government. U.S. and European officials believe a concerted effort is underway to provoke the Georgian government into an armed confrontation. [again, while comparatively poor record, it’s not surprising if one considers Russia’s ethos] [*****]
Perhaps Medvedev isn't really in charge of Russian foreign policy or relations with foreign oil companies. Maybe he can't control what charges his prosecutors choose to bring, the regulatory actions of the labor ministry, the tax investigations of the interior ministry or even visa decisions. Whatever the case, this Russian president is already in danger of making "legal nihilism" the byword for his administration. [****]
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Gas Price Follies

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/opinion/28mon2.html
July 28, 2008
Editorial
Gas Price Follies
[editorial] [world petroleum crisis] [public opinion] [polling data] [I have commented in recent months as petroleum steep rise that perhaps the world has finally reached critical mass for change] [this seris supportive and contradictory evidence of my conclusion] [while recently traveling in Euro, I heard support repeatedly for dramatic change] [oil prices in northern Euro something like $10/gallon] [$7.50 per liter but I didn’t ever confirm whether it was Euro or dollar] [saw that sign in Germany] [former East Germany] [use for psci350] [use for ir text] [c.f., series that began in yesterday’s external] [******]
Add high energy prices to a sagging economy in an election year and politicians will inevitably come up with bad policies, like converting the corn crop into ethanol or John McCain’s proposal to suspend the federal gas tax — neither will provide real relief at the pump while both are guaranteed to create other problems.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/opinion/28mon2.html
July 28, 2008
Editorial
Gas Price Follies
[editorial] [world petroleum crisis] [public opinion] [polling data] [I have commented in recent months as petroleum steep rise that perhaps the world has finally reached critical mass for change] [this seris supportive and contradictory evidence of my conclusion] [while recently traveling in Euro, I heard support repeatedly for dramatic change] [oil prices in northern Euro something like $10/gallon] [$7.50 per liter but I didn’t ever confirm whether it was Euro or dollar] [saw that sign in Germany] [former East Germany] [use for psci350] [use for ir text] [c.f., series that began in yesterday’s external] [******]
Add high energy prices to a sagging economy in an election year and politicians will inevitably come up with bad policies, like converting the corn crop into ethanol or John McCain’s proposal to suspend the federal gas tax — neither will provide real relief at the pump while both are guaranteed to create other problems.
The good news is that Congress failed last week to cut a deal on two more bad ideas: Republicans’ misguided push for offshore drilling and Democrats’ misbegotten plan to curb speculation in oil futures. [NYTs premise: global subsidies of petroleum, especially in China and India but elsewhere also, accounts for huge majority of increased prices not speculation] [******]
Republicans should know that allowing more offshore drilling might marginally trim oil prices — in about a decade — while sacrificing important environmental protections. Democrats should know that financial speculation is not what’s driving oil prices, and that curbing futures trading could hamper the ability of companies like airlines and oil refineries to manage their risks by locking in the price of oil. Putting them together is compounding one bad idea with another.
Of course, there is plenty of evidence that markets can be manipulated by fraudulent speculation — recall the Enron mess. Yet all evidence suggests that speculation has little to do with the rising price of crude. From rice to iron, commodity prices are all rising, even without much financial speculation, due to a variety of factors including a weak dollar and growing demand from China and India.
A report by government agencies — including the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury and Energy Departments — found that speculative trades in oil contracts had little to no effect on the rise in prices over the last five years. [*******]
Oil futures are financial contracts for future delivery of oil. Their price has been responding to the same factors: growing world demand in the face of stagnant supply and the expectation that this dynamic will continue.
Like some of the other “cures,” offering to solve Americans’ energy woes by drilling or slapping Wall Street around merely feeds the myth that there is a quick and easy solution out there. There isn’t. Expensive oil is likely here to stay. Americans must burn less oil and find alternative sources of energy that do far less damage to the environment.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

A Fresh Start With Pakistan

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/opinion/28mon1.html
July 28, 2008
Editorial
A Fresh Start With Pakistan
[editorial] [Pakistan’s new PM, Gilani] [is there room for a fresh start?] [is there the will for a fresh start?] [********]
Pakistan’s new civilian prime minister, Yousaf Raza Gilani, is in Washington this week for what we are sure will be a difficult set of meetings.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/opinion/28mon1.html
July 28, 2008
Editorial
A Fresh Start With Pakistan
[editorial] [Pakistan’s new PM, Gilani] [is there room for a fresh start?] [is there the will for a fresh start?] [********]
Pakistan’s new civilian prime minister, Yousaf Raza Gilani, is in Washington this week for what we are sure will be a difficult set of meetings.
Mr. Gilani’s constituents deeply resent the United States for propping up and enabling their former dictator, Pervez Musharraf. President Bush, who directed that enabling, must have his own serious doubts about Mr. Gilani’s willingness to fight Taliban and Qaeda forces that are using Pakistan as a safe haven. [*******]
That is why Mr. Bush needs to use this visit to recast relations — making clear that he is committed to strengthening both Pakistan’s democracy and its ability to fight extremism. That will require a lot more economic assistance and more carefully monitored military aid.
For their part, Pakistan’s civilian leaders must provide more honest and effective governance. They must tell their voters that extremism also threatens Pakistan — and that this is not just America’s fight. [thus far they haven’t] [rather, they have tried to buy stability on cheap] [negotiating with almost any group] [***********]
The government also needs to find new ways of asserting its authority in the tribal areas, by providing better social services, promoting economic development and working more closely with tribal leaders. And it must send more elite troops trained in counterinsurgency to take on Al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Both sides would be better able to achieve these goals if Congress approved legislation introduced this month by Senator Joseph Biden and Senator Richard Lugar that provides for substantial long-term increases in economic assistance to Pakistan and tighter monitoring of American military assistance. The White House needs to give this bipartisan initiative its strong support.
The imbalance it seeks to remedy between lavish but misdirected military aid and miserly economic assistance was highlighted in the recent Congressional skirmish over who would pay for modernizing Pakistan’s jet fighters.
The modernized F-16 is a high-technology plane, mainly intended to deter India, and is poorly suited to counterinsurgency operations along the Afghan border. The original plan was for Pakistan to pay the $230 million a year. But now the White House and Mr. Gilani want Congress to pick up the tab. [**********]
Mr. Gilani is eager to keep the Pakistani military happy — and the new army commander, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, is a professional who has supported the transition to civilian government. [****]If Washington pays, it would also, in theory, free up those millions for badly needed social spending.
If spent wisely, that money could go far. A program to control and prevent hepatitis B infections would cost roughly $100 million. A public-health laboratory network could be set up for $30 million.
Under present aid formulas, Washington can pay for the F-16 upgrades only by shifting funds from equipment better suited for fighting the Taliban. Pakistan needs more such equipment — not less — including Cobra helicopters and night-vision goggles. [***]
Pakistan should not be modernizing the F-16’s at all, but that deal was made long ago. Congress should hold its nose and approve this year’s F-16 money, plus additional emergency funds for the helicopters and goggles. Then it should quickly enact the Biden-Lugar legislation. [but Pakistan is obsessed with India] [thus, it will continue to push for high tech weapons not suitable for counterterrorism] [a shame as war with India is not all that like as both have nukes] [but they have fought 3-4 major wars since independence in 1948] [*****]
That way, Pakistan will have reliable funding for future social programs and be able to focus American military aid on counterterrorism. It is an imperfect solution but could be the start of a better relationship — one that promotes democracy and the fight against Al Qaeda.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Obama Links Economy to Foreign Policy

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701446.html
Obama Links Economy to Foreign Policy
By Ed O'Keefe
washingtonpost.com Staff Writer
Monday, July 28, 2008; A08 [societal] [election-year politics] [approaching conventions] [99 days remain before Nov 4 election] [tit-for-tat mudslinging from both camps ][***]
CHICAGO, July 27 -- Ahead of a week of campaign appearances focused on the economy, Sen. Barack Obama suggested Sunday that there is a domestic economic benefit to improved U.S. relations with the rest of the world.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701446.html
Obama Links Economy to Foreign Policy
By Ed O'Keefe
washingtonpost.com Staff Writer
Monday, July 28, 2008; A08 [societal] [election-year politics] [approaching conventions] [99 days remain before Nov 4 election] [tit-for-tat mudslinging from both camps ][***]
CHICAGO, July 27 -- Ahead of a week of campaign appearances focused on the economy, Sen. Barack Obama suggested Sunday that there is a domestic economic benefit to improved U.S. relations with the rest of the world.
"When you think about the big problems we face here at home, they're connected to the problems we face abroad," Obama said before an audience of several hundred here at the quadrennial "Unity: Journalists of Color" conference. A broader international effort in Afghanistan and a drawdown of U.S. forces in Iraq, he added, have the potential to "free up money to keep folks in their homes" and provide funds for other domestic concerns.
"We can't keep spending $10 billion a month in Iraq, at a time when we have pressing needs here in the United States of America," [clever gambit] [****] the Democratic presidential candidate said. [look for McCain camp to re-emphasize Obama’s naivatee over the challenges of gsave] [*******]
Obama called the housing bill that went to President Bush's desk on Saturday "a good start in creating a floor beneath which the housing market will not sink," adding later that "we're going to have to do more."
While the senator from Illinois tried to keep his remarks focused on domestic concerns, he did share some impressions of his just-completed trip abroad.
"The world is waiting for the United States to reengage. In the Middle East, Israelis and Palestinians are waiting for us to get involved," he said, adding there should be "sustained American engagement" in the region's peace process. He said reaction to his Berlin speech "was a testimony for how hungry Europeans are for American leadership."
Unity had also invited the Republican candidate, Sen. John McCain, to address the convention, but his campaign declined, citing a scheduling conflict.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

McCain Says Obama Plays Politics on Iraq

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701445.html
McCain Says Obama Plays Politics on Iraq
Some Fellow Republicans Question Tactics
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, July 28, 2008; A08 [societal] [election-year politics] [approaching conventions] [99 days remain before Nov 4 election] [tit-for-tat mudslinging from both camps ][***]
In his most direct challenge yet of his Democratic presidential rival's Iraq policy, Sen. John McCain suggested yesterday that Sen. Barack Obama had crafted a war strategy designed to further his own political advancement. [******] [silly] [equivalent of being shocked that gambling occurred in Casa Blanca]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701445.html
McCain Says Obama Plays Politics on Iraq
Some Fellow Republicans Question Tactics
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, July 28, 2008; A08 [societal] [election-year politics] [approaching conventions] [99 days remain before Nov 4 election] [tit-for-tat mudslinging from both camps ][***]
In his most direct challenge yet of his Democratic presidential rival's Iraq policy, Sen. John McCain suggested yesterday that Sen. Barack Obama had crafted a war strategy designed to further his own political advancement. [******] [silly] [equivalent of being shocked that gambling occurred in Casa Blanca]
McCain also intimated that Obama skipped a visit of wounded U.S. troops in Germany last week because it would not generate sufficient publicity for his campaign, a charge that the Republican made the centerpiece of a new television ad.
Obama's call for withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq, McCain said, "was political" and was made "in order to help him get the nomination of his party." In a different interview, McCain said that "Senator Obama just views this war as another political issue with which he can change positions."
McCain's comments came days after he said in New Hampshire, "It seems to me that Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign." They appear to reflect the campaign's belief that it can make inroads with voters by keeping the focus on foreign policy issues after Obama's return from a week-long trip to Afghanistan, Iraq, the Middle East and Western Europe. The moves puzzled some GOP strategists, who said McCain would be better off touting a more positive message, and the senator from Arizona drew a strong rebuke from a longtime ally, Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.), who traveled with Obama last week to Afghanistan and Iraq as part of a congressional delegation.
"I think John is treading on some very thin ground here when he impugns motives and when we start to get into 'You're less patriotic than me. I'm more patriotic,' " Hagel said on CBS's "Face the Nation." "I admire and respect John McCain very much. . . . John's better than that." [***]
Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor said that McCain is not living up to the standards he set out at the outset of the general-election campaign, when he repeatedly called for a "civil" and "respectful" debate. [****] "John McCain is an honorable man running an increasingly dishonorable campaign," Vietor said. "I think a lot of people are wondering what happened to the civil campaign John McCain said he was going to run."
McCain, a supporter of the war in Iraq who later criticized the way it was waged and supported sending more troops there, said he based his own approach to the war on principle, while Obama developed a strategy aimed at appealing to voters. "I say that it was very clear that a decision had to be made, and I made it when it wasn't popular. He made a decision which was popular with his base. And that is a fundamental difference," McCain said in a taped interview on ABC.
He took his argument a step further on CNN, saying that Obama's support for a withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months would squander the efforts of Americans who died fighting the war there.
"I'm not prepared to see the sacrifice of so many brave young Americans lost because Senator Obama just views this war as another political issue with which he can change positions," McCain said.
McCain's new ad questions why Obama decided to exercise during a stopover in Germany late last week rather than visit wounded soldiers. In the ad, a narrator says that Obama "made time to go to the gym but canceled a visit with wounded troops." The ad continues: "Seems the Pentagon wouldn't allow him to bring cameras. John McCain is always there for our troops. McCain -- country first."
Obama and his aides -- who provided different explanations for the event in recent days -- said they had been trying to arrange a private visit to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center but canceled it upon learning that the military regarded one of Obama's military advisers as a campaign staffer. Obama said the distinction "triggered then a concern that maybe our visit was going to be perceived as political" and therefore the campaign called off the visit.
Hagel said the ad is not "appropriate," adding that if Obama had gone ahead with the visit he would have laid himself open to another line of criticism. "It would be totally inappropriate for him on a campaign trip to go to a military hospital and use those soldiers as props," [****]Hagel said.
McCain's campaign has continued to press the point, however, circulating ahead of ABC's broadcast a partial transcript of its interview. In it, the presumptive GOP nominee remarked: "I think people make a judgment by what we do and what we don't do. He certainly found time to do other things. . . . If I had been told by the Pentagon that I couldn't visit those troops, and I was there and wanted to be there, I guarantee you, there would have been a seismic event."
One GOP strategist with close ties to McCain's campaign said the new line of attack reflected the operation's "schizophrenic" nature. [****] He said that tendency was also on display last week, as McCain spoke at length about media coverage of Obama rather than sticking with his plan to focus on the economy.
"They couldn't help themselves," the strategist said, adding that the ad over the hospital visit is "churlish and unlike McCain, and hardly will resonate with the swing voters who are going to decide this election." The strategist continued: "They're doing it because the candidate, and the campaign, is not happy with where they are and they're lashing out."
If McCain hopes to win the election, the strategist added, "he needs to be a happy warrior."
Staff writer Michael D. Shear contributed to this report.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

China's Cars, Accelerating A Global Demand for Fuel

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701911.html
China's Cars, Accelerating A Global Demand for Fuel
By Ariana Eunjung Cha
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, July 28, 2008; A01 [China] [PRC] [with China’s rise as great power, manifold problems?] [China’s done business in Africa almost purely on China’s economic and power interests] [buys energy and sells armaments to nearly any regime including Zimbabwe, Sudan & pariah states] [likely to challenge US increasingly by mid century] [c.f., yesterday’s societal where China journalist says he thinks China’s culture and demographics, etc. likely to thwart rise to true superpower status] [we shall see] [here: china’s dramatically surging consumer sector is buying cars and manufactured goods, so forth] [one result is climate change and dramatically increased oil prices in West as China and many other states subsidize pretroleum] [put simply: subsidies encourage increased use of petroleum!] [use psci350] [use ir text] [***]
SONGJIANG, China -- Nodding his head to the disco music blaring out of his car's nine speakers, Zhang Linsen swings the shiny, black Hummer H2 out of his company's gates and on to the spacious four-lane road.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701911.html
China's Cars, Accelerating A Global Demand for Fuel
By Ariana Eunjung Cha
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, July 28, 2008; A01 [China] [PRC] [with China’s rise as great power, manifold problems?] [China’s done business in Africa almost purely on China’s economic and power interests] [buys energy and sells armaments to nearly any regime including Zimbabwe, Sudan & pariah states] [likely to challenge US increasingly by mid century] [c.f., yesterday’s societal where China journalist says he thinks China’s culture and demographics, etc. likely to thwart rise to true superpower status] [we shall see] [here: china’s dramatically surging consumer sector is buying cars and manufactured goods, so forth] [one result is climate change and dramatically increased oil prices in West as China and many other states subsidize pretroleum] [put simply: subsidies encourage increased use of petroleum!] [use psci350] [use ir text] [***]
SONGJIANG, China -- Nodding his head to the disco music blaring out of his car's nine speakers, Zhang Linsen swings the shiny, black Hummer H2 out of his company's gates and on to the spacious four-lane road.
Running a hand over his closely shaved head, Zhang scans the expanse of high-end suburban offices and villas that a decade ago was just another patch of farmland outside of Shanghai. To his left is a royal blue sedan with a couple and a baby, in front of him a lone young woman being chauffeured in a van.
"In China, size matters," says Zhang, the 44-year-old founder of a media and graphic design company. "People want to have a car that shows off their status in society. No one wants to buy small."
Zhang grasps the wheels of his Hummer, called "hanma" or "fierce horse" in Chinese, and hits the accelerator.
Car ownership in China is exploding, and it's not only cars but also sport-utility vehicles, pickup trucks and other gas-guzzling rides. Elsewhere in the world, the popularity of these vehicles has tumbled as the cost of oil has soared. [***] But in China, the number of SUVs sold rose 43 percent in May compared with the previous year, and full-size sedans were up 15 percent. [***] [this supports Pomfret’s thesis in yesterday’s societal] [****] Indeed, China's demand for gas is much of the reason for the dramatic run-up in global oil prices.
China alone accounts for about 40 percent of the world's recent increase in demand for oil, [and India another large chunck] [****] burning through twice as much now as it did a decade ago. Fifteen years ago, there were almost no private cars in the country. By the end of last year, the number had reached 15.2 million.
There are now more Buicks -- the venerable, boat-like American luxury car of years past -- sold in China than in the United States. [wow!] [******]Demand for Hummers has been so strong that starting this year, Chinese consumers can buy a similar military-style vehicle called the Predator at more than 25 new dealerships.
Yet strong demand for oil isn't limited to China and its automobiles. Ever since an investment group led by a New York lawyer and a New Haven, Conn., banker came up with the notion of using Pennsylvania oil for lighting in the 1880s, petroleum has been an essential component of the industrial age. It fuels ships, planes and cars, and goes into road asphalt, home heating fuel, lubricants, plastics and petrochemicals.
The United States is the world's single largest consumer of oil, burning through more than 20 million barrels per day last year. This year, U.S. usage is on track to decline the most in 25 years, the result of high fuel prices and a sluggish economy. Still, about one of every eight barrels of oil produced worldwide ultimately ends up in the fuel tank of an American car or truck. [******]
Demand in many developing countries, in the meantime, is accelerating because of the spread of middle-class lifestyles and populist policies that subsidize [***] [why subsidies?] [to hedge against inflation; societal tranquility] [****] fuel to keep it cheap.
India's government, for example, will spend $24.5 billion this year on oil subsidies. [***] [or about a third of –iraq’s entire budget—which is almost all oil] And that's after subsidies were scaled back in June, triggering riots over the cost of diesel, which fuels most of the country's vehicles, and other oil products. "The hike in fuel prices last month has done little to damp soaring diesel demand," [***] said Seema Desai, an analyst at the Eurasia Group. Indians are paying about $3.60 a gallon for diesel, far below market rates, and demand is still growing at an annual rate of more than 20 percent.
Oil-producing countries are even more generous to their residents. In Venezuela, gasoline costs 12 cents a gallon. In Iran, it costs 41 cents. In Saudi Arabia, it costs 47 cents; in Russia, $3.90. [****]
All this growth is more than offsetting the conservation measures taken in the United States, Europe and other industrialized nations. This year, the combined consumption of China, India, Russia and the Middle East will increase 4.4 percent and for the first time exceed that of the United States, according to the International Energy Agency.
For energy planners in the industrialized world, this is a cruel irony, coming after a concerted effort by consumers and lawmakers to steer consumption downward. If China continues to increase its use of oil at the average pace of 6 to 7 percent a year, as it has since 1990, it will consume as much as the United States in more than 20 years.
But China bristles at criticism of its growing oil use, noting that per capita it will remain a small fraction of U.S. consumption for decades to come. Moreover, industrialized nations all relied on heavy petroleum use as they developed. Why should we be penalized, the Chinese ask, for coming late to the game?
* * *
While a number of factors contribute to China's surging demand, including rapid industrial development and hoarding by the government to ensure adequate supplies for this summer's Olympic Games in Beijing, it is autos that are having the biggest impact. [***]
Yet despite this dizzying increase in passenger cars, less [sic] [***] than 4 percent of the country's 1.3 billion people have already bought one. That's where the United States was in 1915. [*****]
"The entire energy market of the world is being affected by this country already. Can you imagine when we get to 50 people out of every 1,000 in China owning cars?" [no and I’m not sure many American policymakers fathom it which is really frightening] [**] asked Friedhelm Engler, design director for General Motors and Shanghai Automotive Industry's joint-venture engineering and design lab in China.
For the previous generation, owning a car was the province of a privileged few -- those in government, heads of state-owned companies and others in positions of power.
But starting in 2000, China began to aggressively promote consumption to balance its export-driven, white-hot economy. Zeng Peiyan, who was then director of the national planning committee, created a list of things average citizens should be encouraged to buy. At the top of that list was cars.
Beijing has simplified procedures for buying cars, cut sales taxes and improved the availability of bank loans. [***]It encouraged local governments to build more parking areas. It banned bicycles on some larger streets. And it laid thousands of miles of gleaming, multi-lane superhighways around the country.
In the meantime, gas has been kept artificially cheap. Even after subsidies were partly lifted last month, a gallon of gas in China costs only $3.40, well below market prices.
Some Chinese cities actually promote bigger, fancier cars to help foster the image of a more "wenming," or civilized, modern society.
The northern port city of Dalian; the Hunan provincial capital, Changsha; Shenzhen, across the border from Hong Kong; and many other cities ban cars with engines smaller than 1 liter from entering their downtowns on the grounds that those cars are old and dirty. Some other municipalities ban smaller cars from expressways, claiming the cars are so small they may endanger their owners when going at high speed. Other local governments single out owners of small cars for special charges -- "traffic capacity expansion" or "road and bridge maintenance" fees -- that can run $150 to $1,500.
In 2006, when China released its most recent "five-year plan," a national road map of priorities, a newly environmentally conscious central government began to encourage local governments to remove any disincentives for consumers to buy and for manufacturers to produce small cars. But legislation that would require local governments to revise their old practices is still pending, and change has been slow.
* * *
The impact of China's official car polices is perhaps most evident in the manufacturing center of Dongguan, a maze of motorways and parking lots close to the country's southern border in the heart of the Pearl River Delta. [****] [but if I recall correctly, that’s where China makes its own cars so those are probably mostly Chinese cars not Western big cars] [***] For every 1,000 residents in Dongguan, 520 have cars -- the highest rate in the nation and nearly 15 times the average.
Spread out over 952 square miles of industrial parks and housing complexes, Dongguan may be the closest thing to a Washington-style suburb in China. With no local subway system, a shortage of taxis and buses with limited routes, Dongguan's 7 million inhabitants often have no way of getting around without a car.
To help residents purchase cars, the government has offered numerous financial incentives. In 2007, the city worked with local banks to allow consumers to put zero down and get a car loan. Civil servants receive generous subsidies for using their own cars for official business, which prompted a rush on automobile purchases by local government workers. Dongguan also ordered operators of parking garages to cap their monthly charges at half the market price in neighboring cities.
All this has been good news for Feng Jiangming, 28, who owns a small business that sells nails, screws, ball bearings and other hardware to stores. Earlier this month in Dongguan, Feng was at the Zhicheng car dealership shopping for a new car to supplement the one he has had for five years.
In 1998 at the age of 17, Feng arrived here from Hunan Province to try his luck as a laborer at the many export-oriented factories that were opening. He remembers that the area was dotted with small villages and that the dirt streets were packed with bicycles. Back then, he said, no one he knew had a car. These days, few of his friends don't.
Feng ran his fingers along the shiny four-door, brown Buick Excelle sedan in front of him and nodded at the roughly $22,000 sticker price. He inspected the sunroof, extra-large headlights, all-leather interior.
When he first heard about the increase in fuel prices in China, Feng said he gave the idea of a smaller car a few seconds of thought -- and ruled it out. "If you want to go golfing or fishing, it's not very convenient," he said.
Salesman Xie Bin elaborated: "A small car is for people with money problems or if they want it as an extra car to give to their wives, daughters or girlfriends to go buy food."
As recently as a few years ago, automakers were betting that the future of the Chinese car market was in small vehicles that could easily maneuver the narrow alleyways of its ancient cities. Then they discovered a quirk in Chinese consumers' tastes.
Many car owners, even those who are lower middle-class, want to appear wealthy enough to have a chauffeured automobile. That means extra room for the owners in the rear. As a result, even big cars in China tend to be a third of a foot or more longer than their American counterparts.
This helps explain why roomy cars, such as the Volkswagen Santana -- a family sedan based on the Passat that is the country's top-selling car -- the Audi A6, Honda Odyssey and various Buick models are doing so well in China. [*****]
In China, the roomy Buick is associated with Sun Yat-sen, the father of the modern Chinese state, and Zhou Enlai, one China's most respected leaders. Both used to ride around in classic black Buicks. Buick's advertisements in China these days add a modern twist, depicting two tall businessmen in suits giving each other high-fives as if they have just closed a sweet business deal.
* * *
Another factor driving the sale of bigger cars in China is the rapid emergence of suburbs. Many of these satellite cities are romanticized versions of how the Chinese imagine the United States and other Western countries, rich with spacious villas and two-car garages, big-box chain stores, strip malls and office parks.
Zhai Yongping, an energy specialist with the Asian Development Bank, fears the Chinese are buying into the American lifestyle: "big houses, big air conditioning, big roads." [*****] [and why wouldn’t they?] [that’s the perception of success] Compared with the breakneck pace of road construction, public transit has developed slowly.
To encourage the Chinese to go green, General Motors, which has ranked first for passenger car sales in China in each of the past three years, is preparing to market hybrid vehicles or cars that run on alternative fuels.
But Zhang doesn't expect Chinese consumers to change their car-buying habits. "Fuel economy is probably the last thing Chinese look for," Zhang said as he drove around the Shanghai suburbs in his Hummer. He said he wasn't worried about filling up the tank even after the government trimmed oil subsidies last month, raising gas prices about 18 percent.
Zhang bought the Hummer in 2006, on special order from the United States. It cost him $220,000, including hefty shipping and import fees. "It feels like a man's car," he said.
Last month, he and two friends set up a Web site announcing the formation of a Hummer club in Shanghai. Some 20 other owners e-mailed him within days. They included several other businessmen but also coal mine bosses from inland provinces and three women in their 30s who are friends and purchased identical Hummer H3s.
Zhang said he and other club members were talking about organizing off-road trips, perhaps to the mountainous parts of Sichuan Province to help with reconstruction efforts in areas hard hit by the recent earthquake. For now, however, Zhang said he's happy just using his car to visit friends, cruising along at 17 miles per gallon on China's ever-growing network of highways.
Staff writer Steven Mufson in Washington and researchers Wu Meng and Crissie Ding contributed to this report.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Revered by the Castros and Their Opponents

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/americas/28cuba.html
July 28, 2008
El Cobre Journal
Revered by the Castros and Their Opponents
By MARC LACEY [Cuba] [Raul’s debute continues] [few predicted how quickly Raul would dismantle some of the most loathed apparati of Fidel’s regime] [cell phones and electronics, tourist hotels, property ownership] [followup] [clearly an opening should any of current candidates wish to take it] [however, role and societal expectations such that many attendant dangers] [followup from July 19] [********]
EL COBRE, Cuba — The most bizarre offering that the Rev. Jorge Alejandro has witnessed at Cuba’s most cherished shrine came from the man who bent down and began clipping his toenails. One by one, the man deposited them at the altar, among the many other mementos left by the faithful for the Virgin of El Cobre, widely considered the mother and protector of Cubans.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/americas/28cuba.html
July 28, 2008
El Cobre Journal
Revered by the Castros and Their Opponents
By MARC LACEY [Cuba] [Raul’s debute continues] [few predicted how quickly Raul would dismantle some of the most loathed apparati of Fidel’s regime] [cell phones and electronics, tourist hotels, property ownership] [followup] [clearly an opening should any of current candidates wish to take it] [however, role and societal expectations such that many attendant dangers] [followup from July 19] [********]
EL COBRE, Cuba — The most bizarre offering that the Rev. Jorge Alejandro has witnessed at Cuba’s most cherished shrine came from the man who bent down and began clipping his toenails. One by one, the man deposited them at the altar, among the many other mementos left by the faithful for the Virgin of El Cobre, widely considered the mother and protector of Cubans.
At this shrine in the foothills of the Sierra Maestra, Cubans leave the Virgin locks of hair, baby clothes, baseballs, diplomas, letters, candles and bouquets. They offer snapshots, trinkets, lockets and pendants as well.
Some have even left banners criticizing Cuba’s Socialist government, which might be unthinkable anywhere else on the island. [*****]
Lina Ruz, the late mother of Fidel and Raúl Castro, visited the Virgin in the late 1950s when her sons were fighting to topple the American-backed government of Fulgencio Batista. She left a metal figurine that is now kept under lock and key.
Ernest Hemingway donated the medallion from his 1954 Nobel Prize in Literature to the shrine. It was pilfered in 1986, but the police recovered it days later. The Virgin makes an appearance in Hemingway’s “The Old Man and the Sea”; the fisherman at the center of the story pledged to visit the shrine if only he managed to catch his elusive fish. [****]
In the case of the man trimming his nails, Father Alejandro, a priest at the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Charity del Cobre, felt compelled to intervene, explaining that the man’s idea was noble but unnecessary.
“We humans relate to the body and to objects,” Father Alejandro said. “We like things to be concrete. But I try to explain that this is not a store where you give and then you get. It’s not important how beautiful the flowers are or how valuable the diamonds are that one leaves. What God wants is faith, and that’s the best offering you can give.”
It is not a message that sinks in easily. On a morning last week, a crowd of believers filed past him carrying offerings, known as ex votos, many of them sold by hawkers on the winding road leading up to the church.
Overlandis Cobas Utria brought flowers for the Virgin, whom he asked to help heal his infant daughter. The baby had a fever so high her forehead was hot to the touch. “The Virgin is everything for us,” he said, as his wife and mother-in-law nodded in agreement and his daughter let out a wail.
The shrine is packed with sports memorabilia left by Cuban athletes. There are signed baseballs thanking the Virgin for some clutch home run or essential out, as well as Olympic medals offered by athletes who believe their victory came about because of her intervention.
On this morning, offerings included pastry that a nun said was left by a follower of Santería, the Afro-Cuban religion that honors the Virgin — though not as a representation of the Virgin Mary, which is what Roman Catholics believe, but as Ochún, the goddess of love and femininity.
When Pope John Paul II visited Cuba in 1998, he did not make it to El Cobre. But from Santiago de Cuba, less than 15 miles away, he honored the Virgin, much to the delight of the local people.
In the years after the 1959 revolution, public processions venerating the Virgin of El Cobre were restricted by the government, which feared that any unsanctioned gathering could spin out of control. Only in the late 1990s were such displays allowed more regularly. [***]
The Virgin, who was supposedly first spotted bobbing in the ocean off Cuba in 1611, has an undeniable political dimension. She has been adopted both by backers of the Castro brothers and by those who believe their rule has run the country into the ground.
Last week, several banners at the shrine called upon the government to release people jailed for speaking out against the leadership.
“Amnesty for Cuban Political Prisoners!” one said.
When Fidel Castro fell ill two years ago, his supporters from El Cobre, the area he has long represented in the National Assembly, visited the Virgin to ask for his recuperation. No doubt there were critics as well, quietly praying for change. Before Cubans flee the island on risky rafts, many come here to pray for a safe journey.
“People who are against the government bring their dreams and their suffering and their pain,” said Father Alejandro, an outspoken critic of the lack of freedom of expression in Cuba. “And those who support the government come here, too. The Virgin brings them together. She’s the mother of reconciliation.”
But she does not make them agree. Among the pilgrims who gathered at the shrine, opinions on the policies rolled out by Raúl Castro since February, when he officially took over the presidency from his older brother, ran the gamut.
Some credited Raúl Castro with keeping the country stable and being open to tweaking the system put in place by his brother. They pointed to his agricultural reforms, which will put unused arable land in the hands of private farms, as being a significant break with the policies of the past. [****]
Others, including Father Alejandro, were unconvinced that the Virgin was guiding Mr. Castro to remake Cuba.
“What changes?” he asked. “Fundamentally, what has changed?” What Cuba needs, he argued, is room for political dissent outside the confines of the shrine.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Russian Proposal Calls for Broader Security Pact

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/europe/28russia.html
July 28, 2008
Russian Proposal Calls for Broader Security Pact
By JUDY DEMPSEY [Russia] [former USSR] [rebirth of Russia’s inferiority complex that leads to Russia’s leaders striking in odd ways] [followup] [Czar Putin’s role just changed from leader on stage to leader behind curtain?] [now Medvedev assumes mother Russia’s rising role] [Czar Putin’s man in Moscow] [on the future of US-Russia relations] [despite same, tabloid media has thrived] [may be just a matter of time, however] [use psci 350] [use ir text] [*******]
BERLIN — Russia, which under Vladimir V. Putin has shown increasing hostility toward NATO and other post-World War II security organizations in Europe, has put together a set of proposals that essentially sidelines these groups in favor of a broader one. [indicative of Medvedeve implementing Putin’s policies] [my experience suggests that is quite popular in Russia] [Russians, at leas the many I spoke with over past few weeks were unsurprisingly and enthusiastically pround of russia’s re-emergence] [nearly back to superpower leverage] [*****]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/europe/28russia.html
July 28, 2008
Russian Proposal Calls for Broader Security Pact
By JUDY DEMPSEY [Russia] [former USSR] [rebirth of Russia’s inferiority complex that leads to Russia’s leaders striking in odd ways] [followup] [Czar Putin’s role just changed from leader on stage to leader behind curtain?] [now Medvedev assumes mother Russia’s rising role] [Czar Putin’s man in Moscow] [on the future of US-Russia relations] [despite same, tabloid media has thrived] [may be just a matter of time, however] [use psci 350] [use ir text] [*******]
BERLIN — Russia, which under Vladimir V. Putin has shown increasing hostility toward NATO and other post-World War II security organizations in Europe, has put together a set of proposals that essentially sidelines these groups in favor of a broader one. [indicative of Medvedeve implementing Putin’s policies] [my experience suggests that is quite popular in Russia] [Russians, at leas the many I spoke with over past few weeks were unsurprisingly and enthusiastically pround of russia’s re-emergence] [nearly back to superpower leverage] [*****]
The proposals, to be presented to NATO on Monday in Brussels, clearly have no chance of being accepted by the United States and its allies in Europe. But they reflect the Kremlin’s latest efforts to reassert itself on the world stage and to challenge longstanding diplomatic practices. [*******]
The Kremlin wants in particular to weaken the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which Russia is a member of, and NATO, which it is not. The Russian proposal would establish a broad security pact open to other countries, including possibly China and India. [the Helsinki? group created around 1975] [focus on human rights and encouraging Russia to allow Jews to emigrate] [but became substantially more over times] [*******]
Dmitri Rogozin, Russia’s envoy to NATO, acknowledged that the alliance would not quickly embrace the proposals, but he suggested that the Kremlin was hoping to begin a dialogue. [Russia ethos: why shouldn’t Russia make unilateral challenges just as US and others have] [many Russians think thusly] [****]
“We do not expect immediate reaction on the part of our Western partners, or booing, or on the contrary, applause,” Mr. Rogozin wrote in reply to questions about his proposals. “We are looking forward to teamwork and practical search of constructive approaches.”
Mr. Putin sent Mr. Rogozin, who has a reputation as a fierce Russian nationalist, to the alliance this year in what was widely seen as an attempt to install a provocative advocate for Russia’s interests in Brussels. [****] Mr. Putin is now Russia’s prime minister, and his protégé, Dmitri A. Medvedev, is president.
NATO will comment on Mr. Rogozin’s proposals once it has received more details, James Appathurai, a spokesman for the alliance, said Sunday.
The Kremlin has already promoted changes in the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Among the organization’s roles, O.S.C.E. monitors elections in nations emerging from the former Soviet Union. Over the last year, the Kremlin has criticized its election observer teams as biased. [****]
The new Russian proposals indicate that now that Russia’s economy has revived after the chaos of the 1990s, the country is seeking new ways to expand its influence.
“Moscow believes that the current security architecture in Europe is a remnant of the cold war bloc ideology,” said Andrew Monaghan, a Russia expert at the NATO Defense College in Rome. “Russia sees itself as the largest state straddling Europe and Asia which has the strength and capacity to adopt a global purview. This includes protecting and projecting its national interests and actively proposing solutions to international problems.”
At the heart of the proposals, Mr. Rogozin said, is a new European security treaty that would be a legally binding document based on the United Nations Charter.
He said Russia would also convene an international forum that would include the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, NATO, the European Union, the Russian-led Commonwealth of Independent States and the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization, which includes Central Asian countries.
The main reason for a new security pact is that Europe can no longer cope with the plethora of problems it faces, according to one of the proposals. “Modern European security is overwhelmed with problems, ranging from NATO enlargement to illegal migration, drug trafficking, organized crime and terrorism,” [***] [and NATO has grown right up to Russia’s border in former buffer states] [Russian ethos] it says.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Bomb Attacks in Baghdad and Kirkuk Leave Dozens Dead

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/world/middleeast/29iraq.html
July 29, 2008
Bomb Attacks in Baghdad and Kirkuk Leave Dozens Dead
By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr. and SABRINA TAVERNISE [-ir] [hydra] [insurgency] [bush administration’s “surge option”] [some positive indicators of improvement] [nevertheless, violence while surge unfolds] [clearly, sectarian] [followup] [“surge” continues amid mixed indicators] [al Maliki govt attempting to re-assure Iran about proposed SoFA with US while committing not to allow –iraq to be used as launch pad] [the spike in violence that began this past spring continues] [tough negotiations over SOFA] [***]
BAGHDAD — Female bombers struck Kurdish political protesters in Kirkuk and Shiite pilgrims in Baghdad on Monday morning, leaving at least 48 people dead and 249 wounded [a comparatives spate recently of female bombers] [***] in one of the bloodiest sequences of attacks in Iraq this year.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/world/middleeast/29iraq.html
July 29, 2008
Bomb Attacks in Baghdad and Kirkuk Leave Dozens Dead
By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr. and SABRINA TAVERNISE [-ir] [hydra] [insurgency] [bush administration’s “surge option”] [some positive indicators of improvement] [nevertheless, violence while surge unfolds] [clearly, sectarian] [followup] [“surge” continues amid mixed indicators] [al Maliki govt attempting to re-assure Iran about proposed SoFA with US while committing not to allow –iraq to be used as launch pad] [the spike in violence that began this past spring continues] [tough negotiations over SOFA] [***]
BAGHDAD — Female bombers struck Kurdish political protesters in Kirkuk and Shiite pilgrims in Baghdad on Monday morning, leaving at least 48 people dead and 249 wounded [a comparatives spate recently of female bombers] [***] in one of the bloodiest sequences of attacks in Iraq this year.
The bombing in Kirkuk immediately set the city on edge. Many Kurds believed the city’s ethnic Turkmen were behind the blast and retaliated by attacking Turkmen political parties. [***]At least 24 people were killed and 187 wounded when a female suicide bomber blew herself up amid thousands of Kurdish demonstrators who had gathered near the provincial headquarters building, said Brig. Gen. Burhan Tayyib Taha of the Iraqi police in Kirkuk.
After the blast, the Kurdish demonstrators attacked the headquarters of Turkmen parties near the site of the attack, he said. “They burned Turkmen buildings and they burned many cars,” he said. Security forces instituted a curfew.
Kurds, Turkmen and Arabs are vying for power in Kirkuk — a city long considered a tinderbox because of its volatile ethnic mix — and rival parties traded accusations about the violence that followed the initial blast. [***]
A Kurdish member of the provincial council, Mohammed Kamal, accused Turkmen extremists of carrying out the attack and said that after the blast, shots had been fired at panicked Kurdish demonstrators from a nearby building owned by Turkmen. “Many protesters were killed and injured by the shooting,” he said.
Brigadier General Taha denied that Turkmen — or anyone else — had subsequently attacked the Kurdish demonstrators, though he said security forces who arrived to secure the scene and take the wounded to the hospital had shot into the air to clear the route for ambulances and police cars.
Farouk Abdullah, a senior Turkmen politician, said offices belonging to every Turkmen political party in the city had been attacked following the bombing. Mr. Abdullah said the Kurdish rioters had destroyed a number of Turkmen buildings and that many Turkmen political officials inside had been injured.
“We don’t know why they attacked us,” he said. “We did not have anything to do with the explosion.” [****]
In the attacks in Baghdad, three women used suicide vests and a bomb in a bag to kill 24 people, all of them apparently Shiite pilgrims marching in a festival, [****] according to an official at the Interior Ministry. The dead included at least four children, one of them an infant, and there were at least 62 other people wounded, according to police officials and witnesses.
The bombers struck in the Karrada neighborhood of central Baghdad, apparently using their flowing black robes, known as abayas, to carry explosives past checkpoints and the Iraqi policemen who were guarding marchers heading toward the Kadhamiyah shrine in northern Baghdad for a religious festival that culminates Tuesday. [***]
The attacks — just five minutes apart — started shortly before 8 a.m., when a woman, walking amid the crowd close to the National Theater building, blew herself up. The blast killed 10 and wounded 15 others, said an Iraqi army officer who was at the scene, as he lifted a baby into an ambulance. Flip-flops and slippers of the dead were gathered into a pile. The air was bitter from the bomb.
“It was here,” said Atheer Allawi, a police officer, planting his feet firmly on the asphalt, boxes scattered from the blast behind him. “We can’t search women. They are wearing abayas, and God knows what they can hide under them.” [they best come up with some sort of compromise lest this increases] [*********]
Police officers interviewed at the scene said that the authorities had heard that six women would blow themselves up in the area, and that the leader, Um Ahmed, was wearing sunglasses. All the women were suspected to have been from an area south of Baghdad called Salman Pak, said an Iraqi police lieutenant at one blast site.
The second attack occurred inside a tent that provided shade and rest for female marchers. The female bomber walked into the tent, sat down and, according to a police official, Abu Ali, read the Koran with the women sitting inside. When she exited the tent, she left a bag behind, and moments later, it exploded, killing one and wounding four, he said.
The third Karrada bomb struck between two traffic police checkpoints, killing at least 13 and wounding at least 15. Nails that had been embedded in the attacker’s suicide vest were strewn about the asphalt.
“This was part of her belt,” said the police lieutenant, nudging a bent nail with the toe of his shoe. He said the woman had turned off the main street where the pilgrims were marching, after the earlier blasts caused soldiers and police officers to conduct more frequent searches. He said she was thought to be the leader of the group.
With reporting by an Iraqi employee in Kirkuk and by Suadad al-Salhy, Anwar J. Ali and Riyadh Muhammed in Baghdad.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Iran Executes 29 Convicts in One Day

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/middleeast/28iran.html
July 28, 2008
Iran Executes 29 Convicts in One Day
By REUTERS [Iran] [domestic politics shapes its foreign policy just as with any nation state] [intersection of Iran’s domestic politicis-cum foreign policy with Persian and Shi’ia customs] [not long ago Ahmadinejad was rubuke by mullahs for making religious remarks-predictions] [followup] [what’s happening in Tehran?] [feign or real?] [early this morning Brian Williams interviewed Ahmadinejad] [unclear whether breaking news or not but some buzz about Ahmadinejad talking about accepting the Western coalition’s proposals or “package” as Ahmadinejad said] [MSNBC] [********]
TEHRAN (Reuters) — Iran executed 29 convicted drug smugglers and other criminals at dawn on Sunday in Evin prison in Tehran, [**] state news media reported, as part of an expanded crackdown on crime.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/middleeast/28iran.html
July 28, 2008
Iran Executes 29 Convicts in One Day
By REUTERS [Iran] [domestic politics shapes its foreign policy just as with any nation state] [intersection of Iran’s domestic politicis-cum foreign policy with Persian and Shi’ia customs] [not long ago Ahmadinejad was rubuke by mullahs for making religious remarks-predictions] [followup] [what’s happening in Tehran?] [feign or real?] [early this morning Brian Williams interviewed Ahmadinejad] [unclear whether breaking news or not but some buzz about Ahmadinejad talking about accepting the Western coalition’s proposals or “package” as Ahmadinejad said] [MSNBC] [********]
TEHRAN (Reuters) — Iran executed 29 convicted drug smugglers and other criminals at dawn on Sunday in Evin prison in Tehran, [**] state news media reported, as part of an expanded crackdown on crime.
The execution of several people at the same time is often reported in Iran, but rarely do the authorities carry out death sentences against so many people simultaneously. [***]
Human rights advocates and Western governments often accuse Iran of rights abuses, but Iranian officials usually dismiss the criticism and accuse the West of hypocrisy.
“The 29 who were executed this morning were involved in the smuggling of narcotics on a wide scale, organized crime, murder and armed robbery,” [***] said the Tehran prosecutor, Saeed Mortazavi, according to state radio.
The police have arrested dozens of people in recent weeks in a new drive against what the authorities call “immoral behavior.” Iran carried out at least 317 executions in 2007, more than any country except China, [***] [that’s a bit of a red herring] [the statistic is meaningless unless per capita is factored] [**] according to Amnesty International.
Iran said Saturday that it planned to execute 30 people for murder, rape, drug smuggling and other crimes.
“We are hoping Tehran will become the most unsafe place for drug dealers, thugs and troublemakers and also violators of people’s honor,” Mr. Mortazavi said.
“These convicts had long criminal records and after being released from prison they returned to the same criminal activities,” he said.
Murder, adultery, rape, armed robbery, apostasy and drug trafficking are all punishable by death under Iran’s Shariah law, [***]enforced since the country’s Islamic Revolution in 1979.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Sudan Rallies Behind Leader Reviled Abroad

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/africa/28sudan.html
July 28, 2008
Sudan Rallies Behind Leader Reviled Abroad
By LYDIA POLGREEN and JEFFREY GETTLEMAN [Sudan] [Islamic Maghreb] [broader middle east] [proximity to northern Africa, Egypt, Horn, Saudi Peninsula] [fired on UN peacekeepers earlier this year] [janjaweed militia recognized by if not fully supported by Khartoum govt] [suggestion that connections are close to the latter and that Khartoum unleashes janjaweed as necessary has been made repeatedly] [followup] [recurrence of threat of civil war] [recently a piece noted that the rebels too are the problem!] [as IOs threaten war crimes charges against al Bashir, Sudanese rally round the flag] [******]
KHARTOUM, Sudan — President Omar Hassan al-Bashir of Sudan has been accused by the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court of genocide and vilified the world over as an incorrigible mass murderer [****] bent on slaughtering his own people in Darfur.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/africa/28sudan.html
July 28, 2008
Sudan Rallies Behind Leader Reviled Abroad
By LYDIA POLGREEN and JEFFREY GETTLEMAN [Sudan] [Islamic Maghreb] [broader middle east] [proximity to northern Africa, Egypt, Horn, Saudi Peninsula] [fired on UN peacekeepers earlier this year] [janjaweed militia recognized by if not fully supported by Khartoum govt] [suggestion that connections are close to the latter and that Khartoum unleashes janjaweed as necessary has been made repeatedly] [followup] [recurrence of threat of civil war] [recently a piece noted that the rebels too are the problem!] [as IOs threaten war crimes charges against al Bashir, Sudanese rally round the flag] [******]
KHARTOUM, Sudan — President Omar Hassan al-Bashir of Sudan has been accused by the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court of genocide and vilified the world over as an incorrigible mass murderer [****] bent on slaughtering his own people in Darfur.
But inside Sudan, his grip on power seems, for the moment, to be surer than ever. [**]
In the past few weeks, one sworn political enemy after another has closed ranks behind him. A result has been a swift and radical reordering of the fractious political universe in Sudan, driven in part by national pride but also by deep-seated fears that the nation could tumble into Somalia-like chaos if Mr. Bashir were removed as president. [***]
The Sudanese government, joined by many of its onetime foes who see the court’s looming arrest warrant as a mortal threat to the country, is scrambling to determine exactly how much it needs to concede to survive.
One previously unthinkable proposal being discussed is whether the government should arrest two men accused of orchestrating the campaign of rape, murder and pillage in Darfur that has left about 300,000 dead and scattered 2.5 million people [***]from villages reduced to circles of ash.
The two men, Ahmad Harun, the former interior minister, and Ali Kushayb, a militia leader, face arrest warrants issued by the international court for crimes against humanity. [*****]
But the government has refused to turn them over. Sudanese officials say they hope that putting the two men on trial in Sudan might persuade the United Nations Security Council to exercise its power to suspend the case against Mr. Bashir. [similar to western democracies, when the heat’s on, Bashir ready to throw former ministers in his regime under the buss] [nice to see some things are universal] [to wit: expediency and self interest] [*******]
“Everything short of the presidency is on the table,” said Sudan’s foreign minister, Deng Alor. [ditto] [*******]
Although the West has been relentlessly focused on Darfur, here in Sudan, most people view the crisis as simply a continuation of a long chain of internal conflicts between an autocratic government and the deeply impoverished people on the periphery. The deadliest of these conflicts, between the north and south, raged for decades, killing 2.2 million people — many more than the lives lost in Darfur — and threatened to split the country along religious lines.
Sudan has been at war with itself for almost its entire post-colonial history, starting in 1956. Nearly all of the major ethnic and religious groups have fought one another, and politics continue to be dominated by mistrust, outside interference and combustible animosities. There are dozens of armed groups across the country, each with its own political agenda. [*****]
One growing concern is that without Mr. Bashir, a peace treaty signed in 2005 between Sudan’s central government and southern rebels could fall apart. The treaty, which he fought hard-liners in his own party to approve, is widely seen as the glue that is holding this unwieldy and deeply divided country together. It calls for elections next year and outlines ways to share wealth and power. [******]
“The situation in Sudan now is so pregnant with trouble,” said Sadiq al-Mahdi, Sudan’s last elected leader, who was overthrown by Mr. Bashir in 1989 and has remained a bitter opponent ever since. Until now.
After the warrant was announced, Mr. Mahdi threw the support of the party he leads, one of Sudan’s biggest, behind Mr. Bashir, at least for the moment.
Luis Moreno-Ocampo, the prosecutor of the international criminal court, or I.C.C., has described Mr. Bashir as the mastermind of a genocide in Darfur. But here on the sun-blasted streets of Sudan’s capital, Mr. Bashir is widely perceived as a relative moderate. [***]
“He is a pigeon, not a hawk,” said Ghazi Suleiman, a human rights lawyer who has been jailed 18 times by the Bashir government. Half of Mr. Suleiman’s face is paralyzed as a result of torture at the hands of the country’s notorious security forces. Nevertheless, he opposes any attempt to charge Mr. Bashir with war crimes now. [*****]
From the perspective of many Sudanese political leaders, the I.C.C. move could not have come at a worse time. A lightning-fast attack on the capital by a Darfur rebel group in May rattled the ruling National Congress Party. Hundreds of heavily armed rebels from an Islamist Darfur rebel faction thundered into the capital’s outskirts. They were repulsed, but the assault exposed gaps in the government’s aura of military invincibility.
“It just showed how the army is stretched to the limits,” said Ghazi Salah al-Din, a top adviser to Mr. Bashir, in a rare admission of vulnerability by a senior ruling party official. A week later, new fighting between the national army and a former rebel force in the disputed oil-rich area of Abyei forced more than 50,000 to flee and sparked fears of a new round of bloodletting.
“A lot of the political entities looked into the abyss and were scared,” said a senior Western diplomat in Khartoum, speaking anonymously because he is not authorized by his government to speak publicly.
A number of nightmare scenarios — an implosion of the government that might invite Al Qaeda back into Sudan or embolden rebel groups to try to topple the government — forced political elites in Sudan to choose sides. Most have chosen, for now, to stick with Mr. Bashir. [******] [most likely means most in Khartoum where Arab Sudanese dominate versus black African Sudanese]
“These are frail and critical moments in our history,” said James Morgan, a spokesman for the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement, the rebel group that signed the Comprehensive Peace Agreement ending the north-south war. Mr. Bashir, he said, should be given “ample time to implement these agreements.”
The international court’s announcement also came as there were signs that the country was taking its first steps toward democracy after years of autocratic rule. The National Assembly had just passed a new electoral law, which would set up rules for the country’s first free elections in more than 20 years.
“The country was preparing itself for a new phase of government,” said Mr. Salah al-Din.
Mr. Salah al-Din acknowledged that “mistakes had been made in Darfur,” and said that the coming political transformation would, through elections, deal with the roots of the crisis — political marginalization.
The north-south war had always been viewed as the biggest threat to Sudan. But in 2003, as negotiations to end that conflict dragged on, a new rebel group rose up in Darfur to demand a greater share of wealth and power for the long-neglected western region. [***] The government responded with the same ruthless tactics it used in the south, unleashing Arab militias to chase the rebels and their supporters from Darfur’s villages. The terror they caused aroused outrage across the world; the Bush administration called the killings genocide. The crisis came to dominate Western policy toward Sudan, often at the expense of the larger struggle to keep the north-south deal alive.
But diplomats, aid workers and analysts who have traveled to the region recently say things have changed in Darfur. The conflict has become a violent free-for-all in which a bewildering cast of rebels, bandits and militias murder each other and civilians largely unchecked by government authority.
“The government is brutal, untrustworthy and bloodthirsty, but the reality is that most of the violence in Darfur today is not caused by them,” the senior Western diplomat said. “Is there a genocide in Darfur right at this moment? No, there isn’t.” [*******] [confirmation that while al Bashir is despicable character and surrounded by vicous murderers and accomplishes, the rebels in the south have begun committing atrocities on huge scale] [*************]
Mr. Bashir’s tour of Darfur last week was short on proposals to jump start a peace process, but a panel led by Mr. Mahdi and other political leaders has been charged with finding a way to defuse the crisis. The government sent an official to Qatar to ask the government there, which helped negotiate a settlement to Lebanon’s most recent crisis, to contribute $500 million for the compensation of Darfur’s victims.
The government and its new allies are hoping that if they can provide evidence of progress in Darfur and persuade the international community that an arrest warrant would create more problems than it would solve, the Security Council will act to hold back the criminal court.
Not everyone agrees with this approach.
Salih Mahmoud Osman, a Darfur lawyer who has documented thousands of human rights violations in Darfur, said the court represented the only chance for victims to get justice. In a recent interview, he wept as he described the painful process of collecting testimony from rape victims. “They told us, ‘Our suffering must be documented,’ ” he said, hiding his face with his hands to cover his tears. “ ‘Our story is not forgotten. You are putting criminals on the record. If not today, tomorrow we will have justice.’ And now it has happened.”
In any case, Mr. Bashir’s newfound popularity among Sudan’s political elite is likely to be short lived. If the arrest warrant is issued, analysts and diplomats said, all bets are off. “He could end up very weak to challenges from inside and outside the ruling party,” [***] a senior United Nations official in Khartoum said.
The government has responded so far to the court’s action with diplomacy and public relations, not violence. It has agreed to allow the delivery of hundreds of containers of United Nations supplies held up in Sudan’s port, and to make visas and permits for aid workers easier to get.
“We’ve been receiving very strong messages of cooperation” from the government, said Ameerah Haq, the top United Nations aid official in Sudan.
Mr. Alor, the foreign minister, said the threat of an arrest warrant may prove to be a blessing in disguise. [***]“Now we are seriously talking about the resolution of the problem of Darfur,” he said, adding that the government was also considering ways to cooperate with the peacekeeping force in Darfur that it long resisted.
“If we take the I.C.C. from that angle, it can be a blessing for the whole country.”
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

16 Killed, 150 Hurt by Two Bombs in Istanbul

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701027.html
16 Killed, 150 Hurt by Two Bombs in Istanbul
Turkish Police Are Said to Suspect Kurdish Rebels
By C. Onur Ant
Associated Press
Monday, July 28, 2008; A10 [Turkey] [hydra?] [insurgency?] [not clear who’s responsible] [recently, an alleged coup by secular—mostly military—groups who oppose the PM Erdogan’s Islamic Party] [thus far, Erdogan’s policies have been relatively benign] [could be related to secularists attempting to create dissonance] [could easily be the PKK’s insurgency] [could be related to jihadis] [watch in coming days for definitive evidence] [if jihadis, use hydra II] [and use psci469b] [****]
ISTANBUL, July 27 -- Two bombs exploded minutes apart in a packed Istanbul square Sunday night, killing 16 and injuring more than 150 in the deadliest attack against civilians in Turkey in almost five years.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701027.html
16 Killed, 150 Hurt by Two Bombs in Istanbul
Turkish Police Are Said to Suspect Kurdish Rebels
By C. Onur Ant
Associated Press
Monday, July 28, 2008; A10 [Turkey] [hydra?] [insurgency?] [not clear who’s responsible] [recently, an alleged coup by secular—mostly military—groups who oppose the PM Erdogan’s Islamic Party] [thus far, Erdogan’s policies have been relatively benign] [could be related to secularists attempting to create dissonance] [could easily be the PKK’s insurgency] [could be related to jihadis] [watch in coming days for definitive evidence] [if jihadis, use hydra II] [and use psci469b] [****]
ISTANBUL, July 27 -- Two bombs exploded minutes apart in a packed Istanbul square Sunday night, killing 16 and injuring more than 150 in the deadliest attack against civilians in Turkey in almost five years.
The city's governor called it a "terror attack," but officials did not blame any specific group and no one immediately asserted responsibility. CNN-Turk television, citing security sources, said police suspect that Kurdish rebels might have been behind it because intelligence reports had suggested the rebels were planning a bombing campaign in Turkish cities. [******]
Many people were injured in the second blast after rushing to the scene of the first to help victims, witnesses said. The explosions, in the working-class Gungoren neighborhood, took place about 10 minutes apart.
"There is no doubt that this is a terror attack," Istanbul's governor, Muammer Guler, told reporters.
Islamist fighters and members of assorted radical groups are active in Istanbul and have previously carried out bombings in the city. On July 9, gunmen believed to have been inspired by al-Qaeda opened fire on police guarding the U.S. Consulate here, killing three officers. [and in 2003, an al Qaeda franchise hit synagogues] [****] Three attackers also died in a shootout with police.
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and President Abdullah Gul strongly condemned Sunday's bombings.
"No goals can be achieved with violence, killing innocent people and terrorism," Gul said in a written statement. "These attacks show how inhumane and miserable the instigators are." [*********] [see NYTs coverage from comments on this important denoucement]
At least 12 bodies could be seen at the scene shortly after the explosions. Broken glass, clothing, store mannequins and other debris were strewn on the ground. Members of bomb squads in white overalls were inspecting the scene.
Many of the injured waited for medical treatment, their faces and bodies covered with blood.
"The first explosion was in a telephone booth," said Huseyin Senturk, who owns a shoe store in the area. "The second explosion was some 40 meters away."
The first explosion was not very strong, Senturk added. "Several people came to see what was going on," he said. "That's when the second explosion occurred, and it injured many onlookers."
Guler said the bombs were placed in trash cans.
Nurettin Kapucu, a doctor at a nearby hospital, said about 25 people were being treated there; three of them were in serious condition.
Kurdish rebels belonging to the Kurdistan Workers' Party, or PKK, have been fighting for self-rule in southeastern Turkey since 1984. The violence has killed tens of thousands of people since then.
Turkey has conducted frequent air raids on suspected rebel positions in northern Iraq, including one earlier Sunday. Earlier this year, it launched a week-long ground offensive.
Although most of the fighting is concentrated in rural areas of southeastern Turkey, the rebels occasionally launch bombing campaigns in Turkish cities and tourist resorts.
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Istanbul Bombs Kill 16 in Crowded Neighborhood

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/europe/28turkey.html
July 28, 2008
Istanbul Bombs Kill 16 in Crowded Neighborhood
By SEBNEM ARSU [Turkey] [hydra?] [insurgency?] [not clear who’s responsible] [recently, an alleged coup by secular—mostly military—groups who oppose the PM Erdogan’s Islamic Party] [thus far, Erdogan’s policies have been relatively benign] [could be related to secularists attempting to create dissonance] [could easily be the PKK’s insurgency] [could be related to jihadis] [watch in coming days for definitive evidence] [if jihadis, use hydra II] [and use psci469b] [****]
ISTANBUL — Two bombs exploded within minutes of each other late Sunday in a crowded pedestrian area of Istanbul, killing at least 16 people and wounding more than 150 in what the city’s governor called a terrorist attack. [******]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/world/europe/28turkey.html
July 28, 2008
Istanbul Bombs Kill 16 in Crowded Neighborhood
By SEBNEM ARSU [Turkey] [hydra?] [insurgency?] [not clear who’s responsible] [recently, an alleged coup by secular—mostly military—groups who oppose the PM Erdogan’s Islamic Party] [thus far, Erdogan’s policies have been relatively benign] [could be related to secularists attempting to create dissonance] [could easily be the PKK’s insurgency] [could be related to jihadis] [watch in coming days for definitive evidence] [if jihadis, use hydra II] [and use psci469b] [****]
ISTANBUL — Two bombs exploded within minutes of each other late Sunday in a crowded pedestrian area of Istanbul, killing at least 16 people and wounding more than 150 in what the city’s governor called a terrorist attack. [******]
The double bombing appeared to be the worst case of terrorist violence in Turkey in nearly five years and seemed to take the Turkish authorities by surprise. [***] There were no immediate claims of responsibility, although Kurdish separatist militants were initially suspected. [******]
Residents in buildings near the explosion sites hung Turkish flags from their windows and balconies in reaction to rumors that the separatists were responsible.
There was no obvious reason the Istanbul neighborhood that was bombed, which is almost completely residential, had been the object of a terrorism plot.[****]
The first blast, which the police and witnesses said was relatively minor, attracted scores of onlookers curious about the commotion, with at least some of them thinking it was caused by a gas leak explosion. [that’s a signature m.o. of al qaeda franchises] [but if elements related to coup were trying to create chaos, they might well use al qaeda m.o.] [***] Many of the onlookers were then hit by flying shrapnel and debris in the second, more powerful blast about 10 minutes after the first and about 20 yards away, the governor of Istanbul, Muammer Guler, said in a news briefing broadcast by Turkish television.
Witnesses described a scene of panic with victims lying on the street in pools of blood. The bombings seemed timed to exploit the summer pastime of many residents of the pedestrian area of Gungoren, in central Istanbul, to stroll in the cool late evening before going to bed.
“It’s surely a terror attack, there’s no doubt,” Governor Guler said. “Because people were gathered after the first explosion, and because the second explosion happened right after, people sitting right across got severely injured.” [******]
Senol Simsek, a witness who provided first aid to the wounded, told the NTV television network that he had seen at least five people lying and writhing near a telephone booth that was destroyed. The police quickly sealed off the entire area and closed it to all traffic.
Hayati Yazici, deputy prime minister who happened to be visiting Istanbul on Sunday, visited the bombing site and told the Anatolian News Agency: “It is obvious that this is the work of a villain organization, a person or people, however it is not certain as to who this is. Our friends are investigating, it will be discovered for sure.”
The double bombing appeared to be the most serious terrorist attack here since twin truck bombings at two Istanbul synagogues killed 23 people and wounded more than 300 on Nov. 15, 2003. [***] An obscure group linked to Al Qaeda took responsibility for the synagogue blasts, which were the worst in a series of explosions blamed on Islamic extremist groups that year that killed more than 60 people. [************]
President Abdullah Gul, in a written statement, denounced the attack here Sunday and said Turkey remained committed in what he called the struggle against terrorism. “Nothing can be achieved by terror, violently claiming lives of the innocent,” Mr. Gul said. “These attacks show the inhumanity and misery of the assailants.” [President Gul is part of Erdogan’s party] [he’s a Muslim] [thus his denoucement is particularly important] [******]
Officials were continuing investigations and analysis at both explosion sites to determine the precise cause and motives behind the attack, Turkish news organizations reported.
There was initial speculation that the bombings might have been the work of the P.K.K., or Kurdistan Workers’ Party, an insurgent group that has been fighting the Turkish Army for autonomy in the southeast area of the country adjoining Iraq. [****]
Earlier Sunday, the Turkish military announced that its fighter jets had attacked 12 Kurdish separatist targets in Iraq’s Qandil region and that it had inflicted an unspecified number of “terrorist casualties.”
Lynsey Addario contributed reporting.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

Responsibility Asserted For Ahmedabad Blasts

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701804.html
Around the World
Monday, July 28, 2008; A12
INDIA
Responsibility Asserted For Ahmedabad Blasts
[India] [India-Pakistan] [Kashmir] [communal violence within and between that has led to the precipice of regional war multiple times] [followup ] [in 2002, nearly a war on sub continent when jihadis stormed New Delhi parliament and killed lawmakers] [well before and since, Hindu-Muslim progroms as the spark to regional war] [this appears to be jihadis revenge] [India is on edge with the recent spate of terrorist bombings] [[use psci469b] [use hydra II] [followup] [*******]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701804.html
Around the World
Monday, July 28, 2008; A12
INDIA
Responsibility Asserted For Ahmedabad Blasts
[India] [India-Pakistan] [Kashmir] [communal violence within and between that has led to the precipice of regional war multiple times] [followup ] [in 2002, nearly a war on sub continent when jihadis stormed New Delhi parliament and killed lawmakers] [well before and since, Hindu-Muslim progroms as the spark to regional war] [this appears to be jihadis revenge] [India is on edge with the recent spate of terrorist bombings] [[use psci469b] [use hydra II] [followup] [*******]
An obscure extremist group warning of "the terror of Death" asserted responsibility for bombings in the western city of Ahmedabad that killed at least 45 people, [**] and authorities stepped up security Sunday after India's second series of blasts in two days.
The city's police commissioner, O.P. Mathur, said that 30 people had been detained for questioning, but there was scant information about the Indian Mujahideen, the little-known group [***]that said it had carried out the bombings.
"In the name of Allah the Indian Mujahideen strike again! Do whatever you can, within 5 minutes from now, feel the terror of Death!" [***]the group said in an e-mail sent to several Indian television stations minutes before the blasts began.
The e-mail's subject line read "Await 5 minutes for the revenge of Gujarat," an apparent reference to 2002 riots in the western state that left 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, dead. Ahmedabad was the scene of much of the 2002 violence.
PAKISTAN
Missile Kills at Least 6 In South Waziristan
At least six people, including three foreign Islamic militants, were killed in a missile strike on Monday in a Pakistani region known as a safe haven for al-Qaeda, [**] intelligence officials and residents said.
The attack took place near Azam Warsak village in the South Waziristan tribal region, bordering Afghanistan. [*****]
"At least three missiles struck the house at around 4 a.m., killing six people and wounding three," an intelligence official in the region said. Another intelligence official, who declined to be identified, said the dead included three foreigners and three local tribesmen. [****]
Residents said they heard the sound of a drone aircraft engine.
* * *
Probe of Jet's Oxygen Cylinder
Australian investigators are focusing on the possibility that an oxygen cylinder could have exploded mid-flight on a Qantas jumbo jet that made an emergency landing in the Philippines with a giant hole in its fuselage, officials said. Australia's Civil Aviation Safety Authority said Qantas has been ordered to urgently inspect every oxygen bottle aboard its fleet of 30 Boeing 747s.
Karadzic's Attorneys File Appeal
Radovan Karadzic's defense team has filed an appeal to stop Serbia from extraditing the former Bosnian Serb leader to the U.N. war crimes tribunal, said Karadzic's brother, Luka Karadzic.
Typhoon Hits Taiwan
A powerful typhoon struck Taiwan early Monday, closing schools and businesses and grounding air traffic. Typhoon Fung Wong made landfall on the east central coast, packing winds of 105 mph. It is expected to drop as much as 36 inches of rain.
From News Services
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Terrorist Attacks Unsettling India

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/world/asia/29india.html
July 29, 2008
Terrorist Attacks Unsettling India
By SOMINI SENGUPTA [India] [India-Pakistan] [Kashmir] [communal violence within and between that has led to the precipice of regional war multiple times] [followup ] [in 2002, nearly a war on sub continent when jihadis stormed New Delhi parliament and killed lawmakers] [well before and since, Hindu-Muslim progroms as the spark to regional war] [this appears to be jihadis revenge] [India is on edge with the recent spate of terrorist bombings] [[use psci469b] [use hydra II] [followup] [*******]
NEW DELHI — Over the past several years, terrorist attacks in India have become an everyday presence in everyday places. The targets seem to have nothing in common except that they are ordinary and brazenly easy to strike. [****]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/world/asia/29india.html
July 29, 2008
Terrorist Attacks Unsettling India
By SOMINI SENGUPTA [India] [India-Pakistan] [Kashmir] [communal violence within and between that has led to the precipice of regional war multiple times] [followup ] [in 2002, nearly a war on sub continent when jihadis stormed New Delhi parliament and killed lawmakers] [well before and since, Hindu-Muslim progroms as the spark to regional war] [this appears to be jihadis revenge] [India is on edge with the recent spate of terrorist bombings] [[use psci469b] [use hydra II] [followup] [*******]
NEW DELHI — Over the past several years, terrorist attacks in India have become an everyday presence in everyday places. The targets seem to have nothing in common except that they are ordinary and brazenly easy to strike. [****]
In eastern Varanasi, a deadly explosion interrupted Hindu devotees as they lighted oil lamps to Hanuman, [***] the monkey god, one Tuesday at dusk. In southern Hyderabad, a homemade bomb planted inside a historic mosque killed worshipers on a Friday afternoon. In Mumbai, India’s largest city, nearly 200 commuters on packed city trains [***] died in a series of blasts.
And, in the most recent attack, 17 back-to-back explosions struck shoppers and strollers on Saturday evening in Ahmedabad in western India, and then two blasts hit the very hospitals where the wounded and their relatives rushed for help, killing 49 [***] people and wounding more than 200.
In a country long familiar with sharply focused violence — whether sectarian or fueled by insurgencies in Kashmir in the 1990s — the impersonal nature of the latest violence is new and deeply unsettling. [*****]
“This is different, because for the first time it’s everyday, it’s utterly anonymous, it’s excessive,” said Shiv Vishvanathan, a professor of anthropology in Ahmedabad. “The familiar becomes unfamiliar,” he said. “The apple seller you meet might be carrying a bomb. It creates suspicion. It’s a perfect way to destabilize society.” [classic terrorist tactic] [*******]
Officials have said the attacks are attempts to provoke violence between Hindus and Muslims that have not succeeded so far. [***] Virtually none of the attacks have resulted in convictions; a suspect in the Varanasi bombings was shot and killed by the police.
Reminders of the danger are everywhere. There are metal detectors at the gates of multiplex movie theaters and commuter trains, and even at the threshold of prominent temples and mosques. Yet they have had no bearing on the far greater number of easier, more densely crowded targets.
India’s congested cities offer rich opportunities. A small bundle of explosives, hidden as they have been in lunch boxes, pressure cookers and on the backs of bicycles, can cause grievous damage. It is also why the attackers have so successfully eluded punishment.
A report last year by the National Counterterrorism Center in Washington concluded that from January 2004 to March 2007, the death toll from terrorist attacks in India was 3,674, [******]second only to that in Iraq during the same period.
Ahmedabad, [***] home to 3.5 million people and Gujarat’s commercial center, is no stranger to violence. In 2002, a train fire that killed several dozen Hindus led to the killing of 1,000 Muslims over several days, one of the worst outbreaks of religious violence in India’s history. [****]
An obscure group calling itself the Indian Mujahedeen warned Saturday that an attack was about to take place “in revenge of Gujarat,” [***] plainly referring to the 2002 killings. The statement was sent in an e-mail message, written in English, to television stations just before the first blasts.
Police in Mumbai traced the email back to the internet protocol address of an American citizen living in Navi Mumbai, a satellite city across the water from India’s commercial capital. [***] Police identified him as Kenneth Haywood, a general manager of an executive training firm called Campbell White. The firm’s website said it offers “accent neutralization, cultural comprehension and verbal/non verbal communication.”
Mumbai police said he had been questioned but not arrested and that they were still investigating whether he could have been involved or whether his email account had been hacked. “He is a suspect, yes. He may not be a suspect as well,” said a police officer involved in the investigation on Monday. “As of now, the evidence definitely points to him, but his email could have been hacked.” [******]
An unidentified man who answered a Campbell White phone number in Bangalore said he could not comment. The U.S. Embassy in Delhi and Consulate in Mumbai declined to comment as well, citing American privacy laws.
In Ahmedabad, H. P. Singh, the city’s joint police commissioner, said Sunday that some of the explosives had been strapped to bicycles in crowded streets and markets. Later in the evening, a pair of car bombs went off in front of two city hospitals. At one of them, Civil Hospital, the dead included husband-and-wife doctors and two sanitation workers.
The police said two additional bombs had been found and defused, in Ahmedabad and nearby Gandhinagar, [***] Gujarat’s capital. On Sunday afternoon, the police found two abandoned cars in Surat, an industrial city in Gujarat, one stuffed with bomb-making chemicals and detonators, the other with live bombs. The police said they were still tracing the cars’ ownership.
On Friday, there was a series of similar low-intensity blasts in southern Bangalore, one of which killed a woman standing at a bus stop. Two months ago in Jaipur, synchronized blasts on bicycles killed 56 people; the Indian Mujahedeen sent an e-mail message claiming credit for those attacks.
On Sunday, a police official, P. P. Pandey, said “a single mind” was suspected to be behind the three latest attacks. The police said they had detained people for questioning; The Associated Press reported 30 were in custody. [***] Officials offered no further details about who was involved in the group or a possible motivation behind the bombings.
The morning after the Ahmedabad blasts, residents of this sprawling Indian capital pointed out that while it was virtually impossible to take precautions against terrorist attacks, they had grown increasingly vigilant of the strangers around them.
Hari Om Suri, 52, stood outside a popular seafood restaurant at the Defense Colony Market, scanning the parking lot for anything that looked suspicious.
Mohan and Helen Nanjundan ordered a chicken sizzler for lunch at Moet’s, a popular restaurant, and warily eyed the bicycles parked outside. Bicycles, a poor man’s transport here, are common. “Every few months, there is another one in another city,” said Mr. Nanjundan, 52. “Sometimes we tell ourselves to stay away from dangerous places, but it’s hard to say where that is.”
“I’ve never looked at a bicycle before,” said Ms. Nanjundan, 56.
Puneet Gupta, 23, said he was trying to avoid crowded markets, but his girlfriend, Jyotsna Malhotra, 21, said she was determined not to let it get in the way of her fun. “We are not sure what is going to happen tomorrow,” she said. “Better to live today, shop, get him to spend some money on me.”
Last August, after a pair of synchronized bombs tore through an amusement park and a fast-food restaurant in Hyderabad, killing at least 40 people, an Indian newspaper called the violence “a war on the way we live.” [*******]
Hari Kumar contributed reporting.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

July 27, 2008

Goal of the Hamdan Trial: Credibility

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/26/AR2008072601565.html
Goal of the Hamdan Trial: Credibility
Prosecutors Seek Decisive Conviction Of Former Driver
By Jerry Markon
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, July 27, 2008; A02 [bush white house] [NSC principals-deputies levels?] [bureaucracy] [dod] [ongoing repercussion of gitmo, abu Ghraib, Baghram, and black sites] [potential pow abuse] [recall the DOJ’s IG report on same in June?] [though relatively infrequent, it seems nearly indisputable that CIA and some military elements used Geneva III banned procedures] [additional trouble from extraordinary renditions] [followup] [congrerss] [110th congress, 2nd session] [past oversight of congressional oversight] [followup] [federal judiciary] [surpreme court’s ruling affecting process] [traditional internationalist versus neocons (Vulcans)] [******]
GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba -- Salim Ahmed Hamdan did not want to fight.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/26/AR2008072601565.html
Goal of the Hamdan Trial: Credibility
Prosecutors Seek Decisive Conviction Of Former Driver
By Jerry Markon
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, July 27, 2008; A02 [bush white house] [NSC principals-deputies levels?] [bureaucracy] [dod] [ongoing repercussion of gitmo, abu Ghraib, Baghram, and black sites] [potential pow abuse] [recall the DOJ’s IG report on same in June?] [though relatively infrequent, it seems nearly indisputable that CIA and some military elements used Geneva III banned procedures] [additional trouble from extraordinary renditions] [followup] [congrerss] [110th congress, 2nd session] [past oversight of congressional oversight] [followup] [federal judiciary] [surpreme court’s ruling affecting process] [traditional internationalist versus neocons (Vulcans)] [******]
GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba -- Salim Ahmed Hamdan did not want to fight.
The man who wound up chauffeuring the world's most wanted terrorist emerged from an al-Qaeda camp in 1999 unimpressed with the weapons training he had received, according to an FBI agent who testified for the prosecution at Hamdan's military trial last week. [******]
Agent Craig Donnachie said Hamdan told him during an interrogation in 2002 that he "had no interest in fighting after completing his time" at the camp in Afghanistan.
Asked by defense lawyers whether Hamdan had committed "to engage in terrorist acts," Donnachie responded: "He did not." [**********]
But in a number of ways, that is not really the point of this historic proceeding, the first U.S. military commission since World War II. To win a conviction on charges of material support for terrorism and conspiracy, the government need not present evidence to a jury of military officers that Hamdan committed acts of violence.
Perhaps even more important to the administration, observers say, is a smoothly run, credible trial, with few theatrics, that results in an easy conviction -- even if the defendant is one of seven former drivers for Osama bin Laden. [******]
"This is essentially a new legal system, and they are using Hamdan to work out the kinks," said Jonathan Drimmer, a former Justice Department war crimes prosecutor. "It's a guinea pig trial."
Stephen Saltzburg, a law professor at George Washington University and a former Justice Department official, said that whatever the verdict, the administration is "going to claim this is a success. It shows that there can be trials and that the process will go forward."
He said the administration is eager to get the trials underway because President Bush's successor may want to close the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay. "Is the next president going to say, 'I'm going to overturn those commissions, upset the appellate process'? I think the desire to move forward now is to avoid this being dismantled later." [another reason for continuity in USFP: stare decicis and role expectations] [use role theory] [******]
For the first week at least, the government has gotten its wish, with only one minor outburst by Hamdan marring the proceedings. As testimony drew to a close Friday, the government had made progress toward portraying the defendant as a relatively low-level al-Qaeda figure, someone who knew details of terrorist attacks, but only after they occurred and often based on conversations he overheard.
"We never put a rank on him. We never suggested he was in the top 17 or the top any-teen of al-Qaeda," Col. Lawrence Morris, the chief prosecutor for military commissions, said outside the courtroom. "I don't want . . . to have anybody have us appear to be asserting that he's more responsible than he is or that he's higher-ranking than he is."
Yet prosecutors also have presented evidence that Hamdan transported weapons, guarded bin Laden and never left the terrorist leader's service even after learning about terrorist operations. That easily could secure a conviction for material support of terrorism, [****] [he’s not a big fish but he apparently—allegedly—had information that could have prevented the attacks] [in the US persons have been imprisoned for long periods for same conspiracy to commit] [Timothy McVeigh’s friends for instance] [****] legal experts said.
"He is a minor player, but that absolutely does not matter legally," Drimmer said. [****]"The prosecution seems to be effectively establishing that he knew this was a terrorist group and he nonetheless acted to support that activity, and that's what they need to prove material support."
Prosecutors also must prove that Hamdan "knew or intended" that his support was to be used for a terrorist act. Federal agents have testified that he told them he knew about specific attacks, if only after the fact and usually because he overheard conversations. Prosecutors have emphasized Hamdan's admissions that he stayed with bin Laden until November 2001, when he took his wife to Pakistan.
FBI agent George Crouch Jr. testified Friday that Hamdan "said he was coming back" to bin Laden after the trip. Before he could, he was captured in Afghanistan. [****]
The second charge, conspiracy, may be more difficult for prosecutors because it requires proof that Hamdan agreed to support terrorist acts instead of just knowing about them.
"Conspiracy requires a specific intent," Saltzburg said. "Just because he overheard something about bin Laden engaging in a terrorist act doesn't mean that he thought his services were being used to assist."
But with a conviction, Hamdan will have served to smooth the way for trials of the higher-ranking al-Qaeda defendants to come. The government has filed charges against five accused planners of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and intends to charge about 80 of the approximately 265 detainees [only a handful of really high-proflie cases though: KSM, Binalshib, et al.] [******] still held at the controversial U.S. military prison here. Opponents believe that the trials are essentially rigged to secure convictions and that civilian courts should be used instead. But the judge, Navy Capt. Keith J. Allred, threw out statements from Hamdan gleaned from "highly coercive" interrogation methods, and he has implored the jurors to be fair.
Several classified documents have been shown to the jury, prompting defense attorneys to say Friday that the trial has not been open. But classified evidence also is occasionally introduced in civilian terrorism trials. More than 30 journalists have covered parts of the trial, though there are few observers from the general public.
Hamdan, a Yemeni father of two who has mostly sat quietly in court, stroking his chin, faces as much as life in prison if convicted. [****]Defense lawyers, who will probably start their case in a week, are expected to portray him as a minor driver and mechanic who was not involved in terrorism.
They have declined to characterize the strength of the prosecution's case so far but have acknowledged that it may be difficult to win an acquittal. The count of material support of terrorism especially "is a tough charge to defend against," said Michael Berrigan, the deputy chief defense counsel.
Hamdan's attorneys have argued that his statements to interrogators should be thrown out because they were obtained during coercive interrogations. And they have criticized the government for giving them hundreds of pages of documents just before trial that should have been delivered several months ago.
"The bottom line is we are not equipped, under the rules we have to operate under, to present an adequate defense," Berrigan said. "We're simply not."
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

A Long Wait at the Gate to Greatness

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/25/AR2008072502255.html
A Long Wait at the Gate to Greatness
By John Pomfret
Sunday, July 27, 2008; B01 [oped] [China’s rise to superpower of 21st century] [conventional wisdom] [Pomfret disagrees] [for me the important conculusion is Russia’s intense desire to return to its superpower status may be principal benificiary] [China’s ethos] [use psci350] [use ir text] [********]
Nikita Khrushchev said the Soviet Union would bury us, but these days, everybody seems to think that China is the one wielding the shovel. The People's Republic is on the march -- economically, militarily, even ideologically. Economists expect its GDP to surpass America's by 2025; its submarine fleet is reportedly growing five times faster than Washington's; even its capitalist authoritarianism is called a real alternative to the West's liberal democracy. China, the drumbeat goes, is poised to become the 800-pound gorilla of the international system, ready to dominate the 21st century the way the United States dominated the 20th.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/25/AR2008072502255.html
A Long Wait at the Gate to Greatness
By John Pomfret
Sunday, July 27, 2008; B01 [oped] [China’s rise to superpower of 21st century] [conventional wisdom] [Pomfret disagrees] [for me the important conculusion is Russia’s intense desire to return to its superpower status may be principal benificiary] [China’s ethos] [use psci350] [use ir text] [********]
Nikita Khrushchev said the Soviet Union would bury us, but these days, everybody seems to think that China is the one wielding the shovel. The People's Republic is on the march -- economically, militarily, even ideologically. Economists expect its GDP to surpass America's by 2025; its submarine fleet is reportedly growing five times faster than Washington's; even its capitalist authoritarianism is called a real alternative to the West's liberal democracy. China, the drumbeat goes, is poised to become the 800-pound gorilla of the international system, ready to dominate the 21st century the way the United States dominated the 20th.
Except that it's not. [********]
Ever since I returned to the United States in 2004 from my last posting to China, as this newspaper's Beijing bureau chief, I've been struck by the breathless way we talk about that country. [China] [we overestimate its capacity and underestimate Russia’s] [****] So often, our perceptions of the place have more to do with how we look at ourselves than with what's actually happening over there. Worried about the U.S. education system? China's becomes a model. Fretting about our military readiness? China's missiles pose a threat. Concerned about slipping U.S. global influence? China seems ready to take our place.
But is China really going to be another superpower? I doubt it.
It's not that I'm a China-basher, like those who predict its collapse because they despise its system and assume that it will go the way of the Soviet Union. I first went to China in 1980 as a student, and I've followed its remarkable transformation over the past 28 years. I met my wife there and call it a second home. I'm hardly expecting China to implode. But its dream of dominating the century isn't going to become a reality anytime soon.
Too many constraints are built into the country's social, economic and political systems. For four big reasons -- dire demographics, an overrated economy, an environment under siege and an ideology that doesn't travel well -- China is more likely to remain the muscle-bound adolescent [***]of the international system than to become the master of the world. [it’s an interesting observation that many of us forget that China’s greatness was during the jung gwo period] [it has never been great power in modern era] [it may be an important observation] [*****]
In the West, China is known as "the factory to the world," the land of unlimited labor where millions are eager to leave the hardscrabble countryside for a chance to tighten screws in microwaves or assemble Apple's latest gizmo. If the country is going to rise to superpowerdom, says conventional wisdom, it will do so on the back of its massive workforce.
But there's a hitch: China's demographics stink. No country is aging faster than the People's Republic, which is on track to become the first nation in the world to get old before it gets rich. Because of the Communist Party's notorious one-child-per-family policy, the average number of children born to a Chinese woman has dropped from 5.8 in the 1970s to 1.8 today -- below the rate of 2.1 that would keep the population stable. Meanwhile, life expectancy has shot up, from just 35 in 1949 to more than 73 today. Economists worry that as the working-age population shrinks, labor costs will rise, significantly eroding one of China's key competitive advantages.
Worse, Chinese demographers such as Li Jianmin of Nankai University now predict a crisis in dealing with China's elderly, a group that will balloon from 100 million people older than 60 today to 334 million by 2050,[***] including a staggering 100 million age 80 or older. How will China care for them? With pensions? Fewer than 30 percent of China's urban dwellers have them, and none of the country's 700 million farmers do. And China's state-funded pension system makes Social Security look like Fort Knox. Nicholas Eberstadt, a demographer and economist at the American Enterprise Institute, calls China's demographic time bomb "a slow-motion humanitarian tragedy in the making" that will "probably require a rewrite of the narrative of the rising China."
I count myself lucky to have witnessed China's economic rise first-hand and seen its successes etched on the bodies of my Chinese classmates. When I first met them in the early 1980s, my fellow students were hard and thin as rails; when I found them again almost 20 years later, they proudly sported what the Chinese call the "boss belly." They now golfed and lolled around in swanky saunas.
But in our exuberance over these incredible economic changes, we seem to have forgotten that past performance doesn't guarantee future results. Not a month goes by without some Washington think tank crowing that China's economy is overtaking America's. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is the latest, predicting earlier this month that the Chinese economy would be twice the size of ours by the middle of the century.
There are two problems with predictions like these. First, in the universe where these reports are generated, China's graphs